Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:49:24.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical validation of the Paediatric Pain Profile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2003

Anne Hunt
Affiliation:
Royal College of Nursing Institute, Oxford; Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Ann Goldman
Affiliation:
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kate Seers
Affiliation:
Royal College of Nursing Institute, Oxford, UK.
Nicola Crichton
Affiliation:
Royal College of Nursing Institute, Oxford, UK.
Kiki Mastroyannopoulou
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Vivien Moffat
Affiliation:
Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Lothian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Edinburgh, UK.
Kate Oulton
Affiliation:
Royal College of Nursing Institute, Oxford, UK.
Michael Brady
Affiliation:
Martin House Hospice for Children, Wetherby, Yorkshire, UK.
Get access

Abstract

The Paediatric Pain Profile (PPP) is a 20-item behaviour rating scale designed to assess pain in children with severe neurological disability. We assessed the validity and reliability of the scale in 140 children (76 females, mean age 9 years 11 months, SD 4 years 7 months; range 1 to 18 years), unable to communicate through speech or augmentative communication. Parents used the PPP to rate retrospectively their child's behaviour when ‘at their best’ and when in pain. To assess interrater reliability, two raters concurrently observed and individually rated each child's behaviour. To assess construct validity and responsiveness of the scale, behaviour of 41 children was rated before and for four hours after administration of an ‘as required’ analgesic. Behaviour of 30 children was rated before surgery and for five days after. Children had significantly higher scores when reported to have pain than ‘at their best’ and scores increased in line with global evaluations of pain. Internal consistency ranged from 0.75 to 0.89 (Cronbach's alpha) and interrater reliability from 0.74 to 0.89 (intraclass correlation). Sensitivity (1.00) and specificity (0.91) were optimized at a cut-off of 14/60. PPP score was significantly greater before administration of the analgesic than after (paired-sample t-tests, p<0.001). Though there was no significant difference in mean pre- and postoperative scores, highest PPP score occurred in the first 24 hours after surgery in 14 (47%) children. Results suggest that the PPP is reliable and valid and has potential for use both clinically and in intervention research.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2004 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)