Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:43:00.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agreement of aspiration tests using barium videofluoroscopy, salivagram, and milk scan in children with cerebral palsy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2005

G Baikie
Affiliation:
Department of Child Development and Rehabilitation, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
MJ South
Affiliation:
Department of General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
DS Reddihough
Affiliation:
Department of Child Development and Rehabilitation, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
DJ Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
DJS Cameron
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
A Olinsky
Affiliation:
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
E Ferguson
Affiliation:
Department of Speech Pathology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

To study the agreement between three tests for aspiration, barium videofluoroscopy, salivagram, and milk scan we studied 63 children with severe non-ambulant spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (CP) aged 14 months to 16 years (32 males, 31 females). The salivagram was most frequently positive (56%, 95% confidence interval 43 to 68%); the next most frequently positive was barium videofluoroscopy when aspiration was defined as the presence of either laryngeal penetration of material or frank aspiration (39%, 95% confidence interval 26 to 53%). The milk scan was rarely positive (6%, 95% confidence interval 2 to 16%). Agreement between the tests of aspiration was poor. The maximum agreement (kappa=0.20) was between aspiration as diagnosed with the salivagram and by barium videofluoroscopy. Positive tests for aspiration are frequent in children with severe CP. Frequency varies widely depending on the investigation used. There is poor agreement between tests used for the diagnosis of aspiration. This information is of importance in assessing the significance of test results.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2005 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)