Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:12:16.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Repression: A mistaken impression?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

ELIZABETH LOFTUS
Affiliation:
University of Washington
SUSAN JOSLYN
Affiliation:
University of Washington
DANIELLE POLAGE
Affiliation:
University of Washington

Abstract

How do clinical observations of repression square with experimental evidence suggesting that emotionally arousing memories are especially enduring? This discrepancy can be understood by examining three kinds of memory distortions that give the impression in a clinical context, of repression. Potentially traumatic events such as childhood sexual abuse (CSA) may be subject to ordinary forgetting. Recent research suggests people who fail to understand the sexual nature of CSA report that they remember it less well. In other words, the event occurred and it was forgotten, but not “repressed.” In addition, people may be wrong about experiencing a period of forgetting, i.e. the event occurred but was never forgotten. Finally, people may believe that a particular traumatic event occurred and was repressed when, in fact, it did not happen in the first place. Under certain circumstances, some combination of these distortions could lead to situations that are mistakenly interpreted as repression.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)