Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T08:06:17.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonshared experiences within the family: Correlates of behavioral problems in middle childhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

Judy Dunn ,
Clare Stocker  and
Robert Plomin
Judy Dunn*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Clare Stocker
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Robert Plomin
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
*
Address correspondence to: Judy Dunn, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most dramatic findings from quantitative genetic research is that environmental influences shared by siblings in a family do not make the siblings similar in terms of psychopathology. Sibling resemblance for psychopathology appears to be genetic rather than environmental in origin; environmental influences that affect the development of psychopathology must be nonshared and make children in the same family different rather than similar. This study sets out to identify environmental factors that differ for young siblings and to assess associations between such nonshared factors and differences in the older siblings' outcome in two domains: internalizing and externalizing behavior problems. Maternal interview and observations of differential maternal and sibling behavior were compared within 67 sibling dyads (younger and older siblings aged 4 and 7 years, respectively, on average), and differential experiences were related to the adjustment of the older sibling, as assessed by mother and teacher. Differential maternal behavior appeared to be particularly important as a predictor of adjustment problems. Older siblings showed internalizing problems in families in which mothers were less affectionate to the older than to the younger sibling. Greater maternal control toward the older than the younger sibling predicted both internalizing and externalizing problems. Differential maternal behavior explained 34% of the variance of internalizing behavior and 27% of the variance of externalizing behavior problems, independent of variance explained by family structure variables. Although the sample was unselected for psychopathology and was too small to permit analyses of the diagnosable extremes of internalizing and externalizing dimensions, these results are encouraging in relation to the goal of identifying systematic sources of nonshared environment that affect the development of psychopathology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 113 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughey, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral/emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. L. (1989). Differential within-family experiences as predictors of adolescent personality and attachment style differences. Unpublished honors thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Baker, L. A., & Daniels, D. (in press). Nonshared environmental influences and personality differences in adult twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Halstead.Google Scholar
Daniels, D. (1986). Differential experiences of siblings in the same family as predictors of adolescent sibling personality differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 339–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, D., Dunn, J., Furstenburg, F., & Plomin, R. (1985). Environmental differences within the family and adjustment differences within pairs of adolescent siblings. Child Development, 56, 764–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J. (1988). The beginnings of social understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. (1982). Siblings: Love, envy and understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J., & Munn, P. (1985). Becoming a family member: Family conflict and the development of social understanding in the second year. Child Development, 56, 480–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1990). Separate lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dunn, J., & Shatz, M. (1989). Becoming a conversationalist despite (or because of) having an older sibling. Child Development, 60, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J., Stocker, C., & Plomin, R. (in press). Assessing the sibling relationship. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on revised Conners parent and Teacher Rating Scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, R. M., & Featherman, D. L. (1977). The process of stratification: Trends and analysis. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L. D. (in press). The obvious method of analysis of data is sometimes inadequate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
Kendrick, C., & Dunn, J. (1982). Protest or pleasure? The reaction of firstborn children to interaction between their mothers and siblings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, H. L. (1960). The relation of certain formal attributes of siblings to attitudes held toward each other and toward their parents Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 25 (Serial No. 4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Volume IV: Socialization, personality and social development (pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McGee, R., Williams, S., & Silva, P. A. (1985). Factor structure and correlates of ratings of inattention, hyperactivity and antisocial behavior in a large sample of 9-year-old children from the general population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 480–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R. (in press). Why are children in the same family so different? Response to commentary by Humphreys. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children within the family so different from one another? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (1985). Origins of individual differences in infancy. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Nature and nurture in infancy and early childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, D. C., & Plomin, R. (1981). The importance of nonshared (E1) environmental influences in behavioral development. Developmental Psychology, 17, 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M., Tizard, J., & Whitmore, K. (1970). Education, health and behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Scarr, S., & Grajek, S. (1982). Similarities and differences among siblings. In Lamb, M. E. & Sutton-Smith, B. (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 357–381). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slomkowski, C. L., Rende, R. D., Stocker, C., Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1990). Nonshared environmental influences and siblings: A multiple regression model. Submitted.Google Scholar
Stevenson-Hinde, J., & Hinde, R. A. (1986). Changes in associations between characteristics and interactions. In Plomin, R. & Dunn, J. (Eds.), The study of temperament: Changes, continuities and challenges (pp. 115–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stocker, C., Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1989). Sibling relationships: Links with child temperament, maternal behavior, and family structure. Child Development, 60, 715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhulst, F. C., & Akkerhuis, G. W. (1989). Agreement between parents' and teachers' ratings of behavioral/emotional problems of children aged 4–12. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed