Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:26:42.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic origin of the relationship between parental negativity and behavior problems from early childhood to adolescence: A longitudinal genetically sensitive study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2013

Silvia Alemany ,
Frühling V. Rijsdijk ,
Claire Margaret Alison Haworth ,
Lourdes Fañanás  and
Robert Plomin
Silvia Alemany*
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Frühling V. Rijsdijk
Affiliation:
King's College London
Claire Margaret Alison Haworth
Affiliation:
King's College London
Lourdes Fañanás
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Robert Plomin
Affiliation:
King's College London
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Silvia Alemany, Unitat d'Antropologia, Departament Biologia Animal, Facultat Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avenue Diagonal 645, Barcelona 08028, Spain; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Little is known about how genetic and environmental factors contribute to the association between parental negativity and behavior problems from early childhood to adolescence. The current study fitted a cross-lagged model in a sample consisting of 4,075 twin pairs to explore (a) the role of genetic and environmental factors in the relationship between parental negativity and behavior problems from age 4 to age 12, (b) whether parent-driven and child-driven processes independently explain the association, and (c) whether there are sex differences in this relationship. Both phenotypes showed substantial genetic influence at both ages. The concurrent overlap between them was mainly accounted for by genetic factors. Causal pathways representing stability of the phenotypes and parent-driven and child-driven effects significantly and independently account for the association. Significant but slight differences were found between males and females for parent-driven effects. These results were highly similar when general cognitive ability was added as a covariate. In summary, the longitudinal association between parental negativity and behavior problems seems to be bidirectional and mainly accounted for by genetic factors. Furthermore, child-driven effects were mainly genetically mediated, and parent-driven effects were a function of both genetic and shared-environmental factors.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 487 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Erkanli, A. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 57–87.Google Scholar
Bagner, D. M., Sheinkopf, S. J., Vohr, B. R., & Lester, B. M. (2010). Parenting intervention for externalizing behavior problems in children born premature: An initial examination. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 31, 209–216.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Hsieh, K. H., & Crnic, K. (1998). Mothering, fathering, and infant negativity as antecedents of boys' externalizing problems and inhibition at age 3 years: Differential susceptibility to rearing experience? Development and Psychopathology, 10, 301–319.Google Scholar
Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75, 81–95.Google Scholar
Blatt-Eisengart, I., Drabick, D. A., Monahan, K. C., & Steinberg, L. (2009). Sex differences in the longitudinal relations among family risk factors and childhood externalizing symptoms. Developmental Psychology, 45, 491–502.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C. S., & Haynes, O. M. (2010). Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavioral adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence: Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 717–735.Google Scholar
Burt, S. A., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). How are parent–child conflict and childhood externalizing symptoms related over time? Results from a genetically informative cross-lagged study. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calkins, S. D., & Keane, S. P. (2009). Developmental origins of early antisocial behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 1095–1109.Google Scholar
Clark, K. E., & Ladd, G. W. (2000). Connectedness and autonomy support in parent–child relationships: Links to children's socioemotional orientation and peer relationships. Developmental Psychology, 36, 485–498.Google Scholar
Collins, A., & Laursen, B. (1999). Relationships as developmental contexts: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Davidov, M., & Grusec, J. E. (2006). Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Development, 77, 44–58.Google Scholar
Davis, O. S., Haworth, C. M., & Plomin, R. (2009). Dramatic increase in heritability of cognitive development from early to middle childhood: An 8-year longitudinal study of 8,700 pairs of twins. Psychological Science, 20, 1301–1308.Google Scholar
Deater-Deckard, K. (1996). The Parent Feelings Questionnaire. London: Institute of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Deater-Deckard, K., Fulker, D. W., & Plomin, R. (1999). A genetic study of the family environment in the transition to early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 769–775.Google Scholar
Deutch, A. Y., & Bubser, M. (2007). The orexins/hypocretins and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33, 1277–1283.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2000). A multilevel approach to family-centered prevention in schools: Process and outcome. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 899–911.Google Scholar
Eley, T. C., Lichtenstein, P., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). A longitudinal behavioral genetic analysis of the etiology of aggressive and nonaggressive antisocial behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 383–402.Google Scholar
Fanti, K. A., & Henrich, C. C. (2010). Trajectories of pure and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems from age 2 to age 12: Findings from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1159–1175.Google Scholar
Freeman, B., Smith, N., Curtis, C., Huckett, L., Mill, J., & Craig, I. W. (2003). DNA from buccal swabs recruited by mail: Evaluation of storage effects on long-term stability and suitability for multiplex polymerase chain reaction genotyping. Behavior Genetics, 33, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, F. E., Sonuga-Barke, E. J., & Sayal, K. (1999). Parents anticipating misbehaviour: An observational study of strategies parents use to prevent conflict with behaviour problem children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 1185–1196.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586.Google Scholar
Haberstick, B. C., Schmitz, S., Young, S. E., & Hewitt, J. K. (2005). Contributions of genes and environments to stability and change in externalizing and internalizing problems during elementary and middle school. Behavior Genetics, 35, 381–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2004). Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 644–651.Google Scholar
Haworth, C. M., Harlaar, N., Kovas, Y., Davis, O. S., Oliver, B. R., Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., et al. (2007). Internet cognitive testing of large samples needed in genetic research. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 554–563.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2002). Biological, psychological and social processes in the conduct disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 133–164.Google Scholar
Hiramura, H., Uji, M., Shikai, N., Chen, Z., Matsuoka, N., & Kitamura, T. (2010). Understanding externalizing behavior from children's personality and parenting characteristics. Psychiatry Research, 175, 142–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffee, S. R., & Price, T. S. (2007). Gene–environment correlations: A review of the evidence and implications for prevention of mental illness. Molecular Psychiatry, 12, 432–442.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. M., McBurnett, K., & Pfiffner, L. J. (2010). Child ADHD severity and positive and negative parenting as predictors of child social functioning: Evaluation of three theoretical models. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1087054709356171Google Scholar
Kilgore, K., Snyder, J., & Lentz, C. (2000). The contribution of parental discipline, parental monitoring, and school risk to early-onset conduct problems in African American boys and girls. Developmental Psychology, 36, 835–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knafo, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Parental discipline and affection and children's prosocial behavior: Genetic and environmental links. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovas, Y., Haworth, C. M., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2007). The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72, vii, 1–144.Google Scholar
Larsson, H., Viding, E., Rijsdijk, F. V., & Plomin, R. (2008). Relationships between parental negativity and childhood antisocial behavior over time: A bidirectional effects model in a longitudinal genetically informative design. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 633–645.Google Scholar
Leve, L. D., Harold, G. T., Ge, X., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D., Scaramella, L. V., et al. (2009). Structured parenting of toddlers at high versus low genetic risk: Two pathways to child problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 1102–1109.Google Scholar
Lifford, K. J., Harold, G. T., & Thapar, A. (2009). Parent–child hostility and child ADHD symptoms: A genetically sensitive and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 50, 1468–1476.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. L., Haworth, C. M., & Plomin, R. (2010). A novel approach to genetic and environmental analysis of cross-lagged associations over time: The cross-lagged relationship between self-perceived abilities and school achievement is mediated by genes as well as the environment. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13, 426–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maher, B. (2008). Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature, 456, 18–21.Google Scholar
Manolio, T. A., Collins, F. S., Cox, N. J., Goldstein, D. B., Hindorff, L. A., Hunter, D. J., et al. (2009). Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature, 461, 747–753.Google Scholar
Masten, A. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.Google Scholar
Masten, A., Burt, K., & Coatsworth, J. (2006). Competence and psychopathology in development. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (Vol. 3, pp. 696–738). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mesman, J., Bongers, I. L., & Koot, H. M. (2001). Preschool developmental pathways to preadolescent internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 679–689.Google Scholar
Moberg, T., Lichtenstein, P., Forsman, M., & Larsson, H. (2011). Internalizing behavior in adolescent girls affects parental emotional overinvolvement: A cross-lagged twin study. Behavior Genetics, 41, 223–233.Google Scholar
Mrug, S., Elliott, M., Gilliland, M. J., Grunbaum, J. A., Tortolero, S. R., Cuccaro, P., et al. (2008). Positive parenting and early puberty in girls: Protective effects against aggressive behavior. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 162, 781–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muris, P., Meesters, C., & van den Berg, F. (2003). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)—Further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 1–8.Google Scholar
Neale, M. X., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.Google Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., & Plomin, R. (1999). Relationships between parenting and adolescent adjustment over time: Genetic and environmental contributions. Developmental Psychology, 35, 680–692.Google Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Pedersen, N. L., Lichtenstein, P., Spotts, E. L., Hansson, K., et al. (2004). Genetic and environmental influences on mothering of adolescents: A comparison of two samples. Developmental Psychology, 40, 335–351.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. A., Hart, C. H., Yang, C., Olsen, J. A., & Jin, S. (2006). Aversive parenting in China: Associations with child physical and relational aggression. Child Development, 77, 554–572.Google Scholar
O'Connor, T. G., Deater-Deckard, K., Fulker, D. W., Rutter, M., & Plomin, R. (1998). Genotype–environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: Antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. Developmental Psychology, 34, 970–981.Google Scholar
Oliver, B. R., & Plomin, R. (2007). Twins' Early Development Study (TEDS): A multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems from childhood through adolescence. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 96–105.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Pettit, G. S., & Arsiwalla, D. D. (2008). Commentary on special section on “bidirectional parent–child relationships”: The continuing evolution of dynamic, transactional models of parenting and youth behavior problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 711–718.Google Scholar
Pike, A., & Plomin, R. (1996). Importance of nonshared environmental factors for childhood and adolescent psychopathology. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 560–570.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2013). Behavioral genetics (6th ed.). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2009). Toward a physical basis of attention and self regulation. Physics of Life Reviews, 6, 103–120.Google Scholar
Price, T. S., Freeman, B., Craig, I., Petrill, S. A., Ebersole, L., & Plomin, R. (2000). Infant zygosity can be assigned by parental report questionnaire data. Twin Research, 3, 129–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. C., & Raven, J. (1996). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., & Raven, J. (1998). Manual for Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Reiss, D. (1995). Genetic influence on family systems: Implications for development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 543–560.Google Scholar
Rijsdijk, F. V., & Sham, P. C. (2002). Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models. Brief Bioinformatics, 3, 119–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothenberger, A., Becker, A., Erhart, M., Wille, N., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2008). Psychometric properties of the parent Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: Results of the BELLA study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17 Suppl 1, 99–105.Google Scholar
Russell, A. H., Robinson, C. C., & Olsen, S. F. (2003). Children's sociable and aggressive behavior with peers: A comparison of the U.S. and Australia, and contributions or temperament and parenting style. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 74–86.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Using sex differences in psychopathology to study causal mechanisms: Unifying issues and research strategies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 44, 1092–1115.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Pickles, A., Murray, R., & Eaves, L. (2001). Testing hypotheses on specific environmental causal effects on behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 291–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saudino, K. D., Oliver, B., Petrill, S. A., Richardson, V., & Rutter, M. (1998). The validity of parent-based assessment of the cognitive abilities of two-year-olds. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 349–363.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. S., Gilliom, M., Ingoldsby, E. M., & Nagin, D. S. (2003). Trajectories leading to school-age conduct problems. Developmental Psychology, 39, 189–200.Google Scholar
Simonoff, E. (2001). Genetic influences on conduct disorder. In Hill, J. M. (Ed.), Conduct disorder in childhood and adolescence (pp. 202–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spear, L. P. (2003). Neurodevelopment during adolescence. In Cicchetti, D. & Walker, E. F. (Eds.), Neurodevelopmental mechanisms in psychopathology (pp. 62–83). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmermans, M., van Lier, P. A., & Koot, H. M. (2010). The role of stressful events in the development of behavioural and emotional problems from early childhood to late adolescence. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1659–1668.Google Scholar
Tong, L., Shinohara, R., Sugisawa, Y., Tanaka, E., Watanabe, T., Onda, Y., et al. (2010). Relationship between children's intelligence and their emotional/behavioral problems and social competence: Gender differences in first graders. Journal of Epidemiology, 20 Suppl 2, S466–S471.Google Scholar
Trentacosta, C. J., & Shaw, D. S. (2009). Emotional self-regulation, peer rejection, and antisocial behavior: Developmental associations from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 356–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trouton, A., Spinath, F. M., & Plomin, R. (2002). Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): A multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems in childhood. Twin Research, 5, 444–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Hulle, C. A., Waldman, I. D., D'Onofrio, B. M., Rodgers, J. L., Rathouz, P. J., & Lahey, B. B. (2009). Developmental structure of genetic influences on antisocial behavior across childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychoologyl, 118, 711–721.Google Scholar
Viding, E., Fontaine, N. M., Oliver, B. R., & Plomin, R. (2009). Negative parental discipline, conduct problems and callous–unemotional traits: Monozygotic twin differences study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 414–419.Google Scholar
Vieno, A., Nation, M., Pastore, M., & Santinello, M. (2009). Parenting and antisocial behavior: A model of the relationship between adolescent self-disclosure, parental closeness, parental control, and adolescent antisocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1509–1519.Google Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, A. A., van der Sluis, S., de Geus, E. J., Boomsma, D. I., & Posthuma, D. (2010). Genetic influences on ‘environmental’ factors. Genes Brain and Behavior, 9, 276–287.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition UK (WISC-III-UK) manual. London: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar