Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:39:06.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frontolimbic activity in a frustrating task: Covariation between patterns of coping and individual differences in externalizing and internalizing symptoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2010

Ida Moadab ,
Tara Gilbert ,
Thomas J. Dishion  and
Don M. Tucker
Ida Moadab*
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Tara Gilbert
Affiliation:
University of Oregon Electrical Geodesics, Inc.
Thomas J. Dishion
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Don M. Tucker
Affiliation:
University of Oregon Electrical Geodesics, Inc.
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ida Moadab, Department of Psychology, 1227, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many problem behaviors in youth have been attributed to maladaptive self-regulation in response to frustration. Frontolimbic networks that promote flexible as well as over- and undercontrolled regulation could provide evidence linking cortical mechanisms of self-regulation to the development of internalizing or externalizing symptomology. Specifically, ineffective dorsally mediated inhibitory control may be associated with rule-breaking and substance use behaviors, whereas overengagement of ventral limbic systems responsible for self-monitoring of errors may increase risk of developing anxious and depressed symptomology. In this study, a sample of 9- to 13-year-old children were presented with an emotional go/no-go task. Event-related potentials were used to identify differences in cortical mechanisms related to inhibitory control (indexed with the stimulus-locked medial frontal negativity) and self-monitoring (indexed with the error-related negativity). These measurements were then related to externalizing and internalizing behaviors. As predicted, externalizing problems were associated with smaller medial frontal negativity amplitudes, which indicate undercontrolled self-regulation and poor dorsal mediation of actions. Internalizing symptoms were related to larger error-related negativity amplitudes, demonstrating overregulation and overengagement of ventral limbic systems. These findings suggest that the use of event-related potential methodology with paradigms that elicit cognition–emotion can provide insight into the neural mechanisms of regulatory deficits that result in problem behaviors in youth.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 391 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T., & Ruffle, T. (2000). The Child Behavior Checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies. Pediatrics in Review, 21, 265–271.Google Scholar
Bertrand, O., Perrin, F., & Pernier, J. (1985). A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 462–464.Google Scholar
Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 2224–2232.Google Scholar
Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 215–222.Google Scholar
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747–749.Google Scholar
Crockenberg, S. (1986). Are temperamental differences in babies associated with predictable differences in care-giving? In Lerner, J. V. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Temperament and social interaction in infants and children. New directions for child development (Vol. 31, pp. 53–73). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. J., Pizzagalli, D., Nitschke, J. B., & Putnam, K. (2002). Depression: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 545–574.Google Scholar
Davies, P., Segalowitz, S., & Gavin, W. (2004). Development of response-monitoring ERPs in 7- to 25-year-olds. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 355–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 5, 303–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1994). Temperament and attention: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1128–1139.Google Scholar
Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (1997). Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 633–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007). Intervening in children's lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Drevets, W. C., & Raichle, M. E. (1998). Reciprocal suppression of regional cerebral blood flow during emotional versus higher cognitive processes: Implications for interactions between emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 353–385.Google Scholar
Eimer, M. (1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a go/nogo task. Biological Psychiatry, 35, 123–138.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Reiser, M., et al. (2001). The relations of regulation and motionality to children's externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Child Development, 72, 1112–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., & Vaughan, J. (2007). Effortful control and its socioemotional consequences. In Gross, J. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 287–306). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Sadovsky, A., Spinrad, T., Fabes, R., Losoya, S., Valiente, C., et al. (2005). The relations of problem behavior status to children's negative emotionality, effortful control, and impulsivity: Concurrent relations and prediction of change. Developmental Psychology, 41, 193–211.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51, 87–107.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2007). Parent–infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; Physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 329–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (2003). The development of self-control of emotion: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 7–26.Google Scholar
Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., Marshall, P. J., Nichols, K. E., & Ghera, M. M. (2005). Behavioral inhibition: Linking biology and behavior within a developmental framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 235–262.Google Scholar
Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchlin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385–390.Google Scholar
Gehring, W. J., Himle, J., & Nisenson, L. G. (2000). Action-monitoring dysfunction in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychological Science, 11, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilliom, M., Shaw, D. S., Beck, J. E., Schonberg, M. A., & Lukon, J. L. (2002). Anger regulation in disadvantaged preschool boys: Strategies, antecedents, and the development of self-control. Developmental Psychology, 38, 222–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. (2005). Anxiety and error-related brain activity. Biological Psychology, 64, 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawasaki, H., Kaufman, O., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., Granner, M., Bakken, H., et al. (2001). Single-neuron responses to emotional visual stimuli recorded in human ventral prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 15–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiehl, K. A., Laurens, K. R., Duty, T. L., Forster, B. B., & Liddle, P. F. (2001). Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: An event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology, 38, 133–142.Google ScholarPubMed
Ladouceur, C., Dahl, R. E., Birmaher, B., & Axelson, D. (2006). Increased error-related negativity (ERN) in childhood anxiety disorders: ERP and source localization. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 1073–1082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladouceur, C., Dahl, R. E., & Carter, C. (2004). ERP correlates of action monitoring in adolescence. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1021, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladouceur, C., Dahl, R. E., & Carter, C. (2007). Development of action monitoring through adolescence into adulthood: ERP and source localization. Developmental Science, 6, 874–891.Google Scholar
Lamm, C., Zelazo, P. D., & Lewis, M. D. (2006). Neural correlates of cognitive control in childhood and adolescence: Disentangling the contributions of age and executive function. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2139–2148.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., West, S. G., & Sandler, I. N. (1998). Temperament as a predictor of symptomatology in children: Addressing contamination of measures. Child Development, 69, 168–181.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. D., Granic, I., Lamm, C., Zelazo, P. D., Stieben, J., Todd, R. M., et al. (2008). Changes in the neural basis of emotion regulation associated with clinical improvement in children with behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 913–939.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. D., Lamm, C., Segalowitz, S. J., Stieben, J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). Neurophysiological correlates of emotion regulation in children and adolescents. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 430–443.Google Scholar
Luu, P., Collins, P., & Tucker, D. (2000). Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: Negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 43–60.Google Scholar
Luu, P., Flaisch, T., & Tucker, D. M. (2000). Medial frontal cortex in action monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 464–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luu, P., Tucker, D. M., Derryberry, D., Reed, M., & Poulsen, C. (2003). Electrophysiological responses to errors and feedback in the process of action regulation. Psychological Science, 14, 47–53.Google Scholar
Menon, V., Adleman, N. E., White, C. D., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. (2001). Error-related brain activation during a go/nogo response inhibition task. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 131–143.Google Scholar
Nigg, J. (2006). Temperament and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 395–422.Google Scholar
Oldehinkel, A. J., Hartman, C. A., Ferdinand, R. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). Effortful control as modifier of the association between negative emotionality and adolescents' mental health problems. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 523–539.Google Scholar
Oldehinkel, A. J., Hartman, C. A., De Winter, A. F., Veenstra, R., & Ormel, J. (2004). Temperament profiles associated with internalizing and externalizing problems in preadolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 421–440.Google Scholar
Ormel, J., Oldehinkel, A., Ferdinand, R., Hartman, C., De Winter, A., Veenstra, R., et al. (2005). Internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescence: General and dimension-specific effects of familial loadings and preadolescent temperament traits. Psychological Medicine, 35, 1825–1835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paus, T. (2001). Primate anterior cingulate cortex: Where motor control, drive and cognition interface. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 417–424.Google Scholar
Pliszka, S. R., Liotti, M., & Wolderff, M. G. (2000). Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 238–246.Google Scholar
Ray, R. D., Ochsner, K. N., Cooper, J. C., Robertson, E. R., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Gross, J. J. (2005). Individual differences in trait rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 156–168.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In Damon, W., Lerner, R., & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 37–86). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Developing mechanisms of temperamental effortful control. Journal of Personality, 71, 1113–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sourander, A., Helstela, L., & Helenius, H. (1999). Parent–adolescent agreement on emotional and behavioral problems. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 657–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stieben, J., Lewis, M., Granic, I., Zelazo, P., Segalowitz, S., & Pepler, D. (2007). Neurophysiological mechanisms of emotion regulation for subtypes of externalizing children. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 455–480.Google Scholar
Tenke, C. E., & Kayser, J. (2001). A convenient method for detecting electrolyte bridges in multichannel electroencephalogram and event related potential recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 545–550.Google Scholar
Tucker, D. M. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 87, 154–163.Google Scholar
Tucker, D. M., & Luu, P. (2007). Neurophysiology of motivated learning: Adaptive mechanisms underlying cognitive bias in depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 189–209.Google Scholar
Valiente, C., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Reiser, M., Cumberland, A., Losoya, S. H., et al. (2006). Relations among mothers' expressivity, children's effortful control, and their problem behaviors: A four-year longitudinal study. Emotion, 6, 459–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youngstrom, E. A., Findling, R. L., & Calabrese, J. R. (2003). Who are the comorbid adolescents? Agreement between psychiatric diagnosis, youth, parent, and teacher report. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 231–245.Google Scholar