Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:06:16.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic pathways between rejection and antisocial behavior in peer networks: Update and test of confluence model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2019

Olga Kornienko ,
Thao Ha  and
Thomas J. Dishion
Olga Kornienko*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
Thao Ha
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
Thomas J. Dishion
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA REACH Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Olga Kornienko, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, David King Hall, Room 2042, 4400 University Drive, 3F5, Fairfax, VA, 22030. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The confluence model theorizes that dynamic transactions between peer rejection and deviant peer clustering amplify antisocial behavior (AB) within the school context during adolescence. Little is known about the links between peer rejection and AB as embedded in changing networks. Using longitudinal social network analysis, we investigated the interplay between rejection, deviant peer clustering, and AB in an ethnically diverse sample of students attending public middle schools (N = 997; 52.7% boys). Adolescents completed peer nomination reports of rejection and antisocial behavior in Grades 6–8. Results revealed that rejection status was associated with friendship selection, and adolescents became rejected if they were friends with others who were rejected. Youth befriended others with similar levels of AB. Significant patterns of peer influence were documented for AB and rejection. As hypothesized, rejected youth with low AB were more likely to affiliate with others with high AB instead of similarly low AB. In contrast, nonrejected youth preferred to befriend others with similarly high or low AB. Results support an updated confluence model of a joint interplay between rejection and AB as ecological conditions that lead to self-organization into deviant clusters in which peer contagion on problem behaviors operates.

Keywords

antisocial behaviorlongitudinal social network analysispeer networkspeer rejectionstochastic actor-based modeling
Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 175 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This author died before the article was published.

References

Bagwell, C. L., Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1998). Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development, 69, 140–153. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06139.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bierman, K. L. (2004). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166–179. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burk, W. J., Steglich, C. E. G., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397–404. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Ferguson, L. L., & Gariépy, J.-L. (1989). Growth and aggression: I. Childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 320–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.2.320.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1983). A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys’ groups. Child Development, 54, 1400–1416. http://doi.org/10.2307/1129803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. A. (1970). Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Teasing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. American Sociological Review, 35, 843–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLay, D., Ha, T., Van Ryzin, M., Winter, C., & Dishion, T.J. (2016). Changing friend selection in middle school: A social network analysis of a randomized intervention study designed to prevent adolescent problem behavior. Prevention Science, 17, 285–294. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0605-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deptula, D.P., & Cohen, R. (2004). Aggressive, rejected, and delinquent children and adolescents: A comparison of their friendships. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 75–104. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(02)00117-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H., & Borch, C. (2013). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1242–1252. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0030098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J. (1987). A developmental model for peer relations: Middle childhood correlates and one year sequelae (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon).Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J. (1990). The peer context of troublesome child and adolescent behavior. In Leone, P. (Ed.), Understanding troubled and troublesome youth (pp. 128–153). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J. (2016). An evolutionary framework for understanding coercion and aggression. In Dishion, T. J. & Snyder, J. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of coercive relationship dynamics: Basic mechanisms, developmental processes, and intervention applications. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66, 139–151. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00861.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., Bullock, B. M., & Kiesner, J. (2008). Vicissitudes of parenting adolescents: Daily variations in parental monitoring and the early emergence of drug use. In Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (Eds.), What can parents do? New insights into the role of parents in adolescent problem behavior (pp. 113–133). West Sussex, UK: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Ha, T., & Véronneau, M.-H. (2012). An ecological analysis of the effects of deviant peer clustering on sexual promiscuity, problem behavior, and childbearing from early adolescence to adulthood: An enhancement of the life history framework. Developmental Psychology, 703–717. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). Adolescent problem behavior: An intervention and assessment sourcebook for working with families in schools. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., & Yasui, M. (2005). Predicting early adolescent gang involvement from middle school adaptation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 62–73. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (2006). The development and ecology of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 503–541). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Griesler, P. C. (1994) Peer adaptations in the development of antisocial behavior. In Huesmann, L. R. (Ed.), Aggressive behavior. The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. Boston, MA: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_4Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Piehler, T. F., & Myers, M. W. (2008). Dynamics and ecology of adolescent peer influence. In Prinstein, M. J. & Dodge, K. A. (Eds.), Duke series in child development and public policy. Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 72–93). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189–214. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., Véronneau, M. H., & Myers, M. W. (2010). Cascading peer dynamics underlying the progression from problem behavior to violence in early to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 603–619. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents: A peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Pettit, G. S., & Price, J. E. (1990). Peer status and aggression in boys’ groups: Developmental and contextual analyses. Child Development, 61, 1289–1309. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02862.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., & Price, J. M. (2003). Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74, 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, K. A., Greenberg, M. T., Malone, P. S., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2008). Testing an idealized dynamic cascade model of the development of serious violence in adolescence. Child development, 79, 1907–1927. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01233.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., … & Wilson, D. S. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48, 598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erath, S. A., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2009). Who dislikes whom, and for whom does it matter: Predicting aggression in middle childhood. Social Development, 18, 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00497.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franken, A., Prinstein, M. J., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C. E., Harakeh, Z., & Vollebergh, W. A. (2016). Early adolescent friendship selection based on externalizing behavior: The moderating role of pubertal development. The SNARE study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 1647–1657. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0134-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujimoto, K., Snijders, T. A., & Valente, T. W. (2017). Popularity breeds contempt: The evolution of reputational dislike relations and friendships in high school. Social Networks, 48, 100–109. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCNET.2016.07.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2018). Selection and influence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology (Advance online publication). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-018-9384-y.Google Scholar
Gest, S. D., Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Hartup, W. W. (2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23–40. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giletta, M., Burk, W. J., Scholte, R. H. J., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2013). Direct and indirect peer socialization of adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, M.T., & Lippold, M.A. (2013). Promoting healthy outcomes among youth with multiple risks: Innovative approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 34, 253–270. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gremmen, M. C., Berger, C., Ryan, A. M., Steglich, C. E. G., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2018). Adolescents’ friendships, academic achievement, and risk behaviors: Same-behavior and cross-behavior selection and influence processes. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13045Google ScholarPubMed
Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A., Van Duijn, M. A., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 645–659. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jose, R., Hipp, J. R., Butts, C. T., Wang, C., & Lakon, C. M. (2015). Network structure, influence, selection, and adolescent delinquent behavior unpacking a dynamic process. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815605524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesner, J., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2004). “Very important persons” in adolescence: Going beyond in-school, single friendships in the study of peer homophily. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, A., Snijders, T. A., Baerveldt, C., Steglich, C. E., & Raub, W. (2010). Friendship and delinquency: Selection and influence processes in early adolescence. Social Development, 19, 494–514. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00564.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornienko, O., Dishion, T. J., & Ha, T. (2017). Peer network dynamics and the amplification of antisocial to violent behavior among young adolescents in public middle school. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26, 21–30. http://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617742345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansford, J. E., Malone, P. S., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2010). Developmental cascades of peer rejection, social information processing biases, and aggression during middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Light, J. M., & Dishion, T. J. (2007). Early adolescent antisocial behavior and peer rejection: A dynamic test of a developmental process. In Rodkin, P. C. & Hanish, L. D. (Eds.), Social network analysis and children's peer relationships (pp. 77–89). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lodder, G. M., Scholte, R. H., Cillessen, A. H., & Giletta, M. (2016). Bully victimization: Selection and influence within adolescent friendship networks and cliques. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2000). Young children who commit crime: Epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 737–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lomi, A., Snijders, T. A., Steglich, C. E., & Torló, V. J. (2011). Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance. Social Science Research, 40, 1506–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, P. E., Cillessen, A. H., & Crick, N. R. (2012). Popularity contagion among adolescents. Social Development, 21, 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00647.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 491–495. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikami, A. Y., Lerner, M. D., & Lun, J. (2010). Social context influences on children's rejection by their peers. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 123–130. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00130.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller-Johnson, S., Coie, J. D., Maumary-Gremaud, A., Bierman, K., and the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (2002). Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 217–230. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015198612049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pál, J., Stadtfeld, C., Grow, A., & Takács, K. (2016). Status perceptions matter: Understanding disliking among adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 805–818. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Prinstein, M. J., & Giletta, M. (2016). Peer relations and developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method. Vol. 1 (third ed., pp. 1–53). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Prinstein, M. J., Rancourt, D., Adelman, C. B., Ahlich, E., Smith, J., & Guerry, J. D. (2018). Peer status and psychopathology. In Bukowski, W. M., Laursen, B., & Rubin, K. H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 617–637). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Rambaran, J. A., Dijkstra, J. K., Munniksma, A., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). The development of adolescents' friendships and antipathies: A longitudinal multivariate network test of balance theory. Social Networks, 43, 162–176. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A B., Boda, Z., Voros, A., & Preciado, P. (2017). Manual for RSiena. Retrieved December 17, 2018, from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/RSiena_Manual.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14–24. http://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.36.1.14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype→environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435. http://doi.org/10.2307/1129703.Google ScholarPubMed
Sentse, M., Dijkstra, J. K., Salmivalli, C., & Cillessen, A. H. (2013). The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: A longitudinal social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentse, M., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status: Age-related and gender differences. Social Development, 24, 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijtsema, J. J., & Lindenberg, S. M. (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: Advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijtsema, J. J., Lindenberg, S. M., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Do they get what they want or are they stuck with what they can get? Testing homophily against default selection for friendships of highly aggressive boys. The TRAILS study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 803–813. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9402-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, A. J., & Ojanen, T. J. (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: Selection, de-selection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.739097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T.A., van de Bunt, G.G., & Steglich, C.E. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoolmiller, M. (1990). Latent growth model analysis of the relation between antisocial behavior and wandering (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon).Google Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., Connell, A., & Dishion, T. J. (2009). An adaptive approach to family-centered intervention in schools: Linking intervention engagement to academic outcomes in middle and high school. Prevention Science, 10, 221–235. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-009-0131-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svensson, Y., Burk, W. J., Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2012). Peer selection and influence of delinquent behavior of immigrant and nonimmigrant youths: Does context matter? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 178–185. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411434652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, W. L., Banny, A. M., Kawabata, Y., Crick, N. R., & Gau, S. S. F. (2013). A cross-lagged structural equation model of relational aggression, physical aggression, and peer status in a Chinese culture. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turanovic, J. J., & Young, J. T. (2016). Violent offending and victimization in adolescence: Social network mechanisms and homophily. Criminology, 54, 487–519. http://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. H. W. (Eds.). (2013). Network-behavior dynamics [Special Issue]. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399–412. http://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., & Kreager, D. (2018). Pathways, networks, and norms: A sociological perspective on peer research. In Bukowski, W. M., Laursen, B., & Rubin, K.H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd edition, pp. 45–63). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., Kerr, M., Pagani, L., & Bukowski, W. M. (1997). Disruptiveness, friends’ characteristics, and delinquency in early adolescence: A test of two competing models of development. Child Development, 68, 676–689. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb04229.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Kornienko et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Kornienko et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.5 MB