Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:03:18.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Couples’ affect dynamics: Associations with trait hostility and physical intimate partner violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2019

Stacey S. Tiberio  and
Deborah M. Capaldi
Stacey S. Tiberio*
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA
Deborah M. Capaldi
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Stacey S. Tiberio, Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd., Eugene, OR 97401; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whether men's and women's reciprocation of their intimate partners’ negative and positive affect during conflictual topic discussions accounted for the association between their trait hostility and perpetration of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) was examined within a dyadic model, using concurrent measurement. The work builds on that of Dr. Tom Dishion regarding hostile and coercive interactions in key relationships on risk outcomes and the importance of moment-by-moment influences in social interactions. Using dynamic development systems theory and a community sample of at-risk men (N = 156) and their female partners, the hypothesis that quicker negative and slower positive affect reactivity would account for physical IPV perpetration beyond trait hostility was tested. Results suggest that, for women, quicker negative affect reactivity partially explains the hostility IPV association, whereas for men, trait hostility of both partners best explained their perpetration of physical IPV. No support was found for positive affect reactivity as a protective relationship process for IPV involvement. Findings are in line with other studies indicating men were less likely to engage in negative reciprocity relative to women. Furthermore, findings highlight how both partners’ individual characteristics, communication patterns, and emotion regulation processes germane to the romantic relationship impact the likelihood of experiencing physical IPV.

Keywords

affect/emotiondomestic violencedyadic/couple dataevent history analysisobservational data
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 31 , Special Issue 5: Honoring the Contributions and Legacy of Thomas Dishion , December 2019 , pp. 1715 - 1727
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, R. A., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., Neppl, T., Lorenz, F. O., & Conger, R. D. (2013). The interpersonal legacy of a positive family climate in adolescence. Psychological Science, 24, 243–250. doi:10.1177/0956797612447818Google Scholar
Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berns, S. B., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Demand–withdraw interaction in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 666–674. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.666Google Scholar
Buonaccorsi, J. (2010). Measurement error: Models, methods and applications. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Burman, B., John, R. S., & Margolin, G. (1992). Observed patterns of conflict in violent, nonviolent, and nondistressed couples. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 15–37.Google Scholar
Burman, B., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (1993). America's angriest home videos: Behavioral contingencies observed in home reenactments of marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 28–39. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.28Google Scholar
Capaldi, D. M. (1991). Partner Interaction Questionnaire. Unpublished instrument, Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Shortt, J. W. (2004). Women's involvement in aggression in young adult romantic relationships: A developmental systems model. In Putallaz, M. & Bierman, K. L. (Eds.), Aggression, antisocial behavior, and violence among girls: A developmental perspective (pp. 223–241). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Shortt, J. W. (2007). Observed initiation and reciprocity of physical aggression in young, at-risk couples. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 101–111. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9067-1Google Scholar
Capaldi, D. M., Knoble, N. B., Shortt, J. W., & Kim, H. K. (2012). A systematic review of risk factors for intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 3, 231–280. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.231Google Scholar
Capaldi, D. M., Low, S., Tiberio, S. S., & Shortt, J. W. (in press). Risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence. In Geffner, R., Vrith, V., Vaughan-Eden, V., Rosenbaum, A., Hamberger, L. K., & White, J. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal violence across the lifespan. Switzerland: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Capaldi, D. M., Shortt, J. W., & Kim, H. K. (2005). A life span developmental systems perspective on aggression toward a partner. In Pinsof, W. M. & Lebow, J. L. (Eds.), Family psychology: The art of the science (pp. 141–167). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, A., Eldridge, K., Catta-Preta, A. B., Lim, V. R., & Santagata, R. (2006). Cross-cultural consistency of the demand/withdraw interaction pattern in couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1029–1044. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00311.xGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73Google Scholar
Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). Sampling, experimental control, and generalizability in the study of marital process models. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 73–80.Google Scholar
Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2009). The specific affect (SPAFF) coding system. In Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 106–123). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, T. L., Shorey, R. C., & Beebe, S. M. (2010). Self-reported communication variables and dating violence: Using Gottman's marital communication conceptualization. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 439–448. doi:10.1007/s10896-010-9305-9Google Scholar
Corvo, K., & Johnson, P. (2013). Sharpening Ockham's razor: The role of psychopathology and neuropsychopathology in the perpetration of domestic violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 175–182. doi:1016/j.avb.2012.11.017Google Scholar
Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M., & Larson, C. L. (2000). Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation—A possible prelude to violence. Science, 289, 591–594.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L. R., & Spencer, P. M. (1982). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Crosby, L., Rusby, J. C., Shane, D., Patterson, G. R., & Baker, J. (1989). Peer Process Code: Multidimensional system for observing adolescent peer interaction. Eugene, OR: Oregon Social Learning Center.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Kavanagh, K. (1992). An experimental test of the coercion model: Linking theory, measurement, and intervention. In McCord, J. & Tremblay, R. (Eds.), The interaction of theory and practice: Experimental studies of intervention (pp. 253–282). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80023-2Google Scholar
Eldridge, K. A., Sevier, M., Jones, J., Atkins, D. C., & Christensen, A. (2007). Demand–withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: Rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 218–226. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.218Google Scholar
Fosco, G. M., Caruthers, A. S., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). A six-year predictive test of adolescent family relationship quality and effortful control pathways to emerging adult social and emotional health. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 565–575. doi:10.1037/a0028873Google Scholar
Gardner, W., & Griffin, W. A. (1989). Methods of the analysis of parallel streams of continuously recorded social behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 446–455.Google Scholar
Gordis, E. B., Margolin, G., & Vickerman, K. (2005). Communication and frightening behavior among couples with past and recent histories of physical marital aggression. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 177–191. doi:10.1007/s10464-005-6241-6Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrère, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5–22.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., McCoy, K., Coan, J., & Collier, H. (1995). Specific Affect Coding System manual. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Murray, J. (1999). The mathematics of marital conflict: Dynamic mathematical nonlinear modeling of newlywed marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 3–19. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.1.3Google Scholar
Ha, T., Dishion, T. J., Overbeek, G., Burk, W. J., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2014). The blues of adolescent romance: Observed affective interactions in adolescent romantic relationships associated with depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 551–562. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9808-yGoogle Scholar
Ha, T., Otten, R., McGill, S., & Dishion, T. J. (2019). The family and peer origins of coercion within adult romantic relationships: A longitudinal multimethod study across relationships contexts. Developmental Psychology, 55, 207–215. doi:10.1037/dev0000630Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D., Cohan, C. L., Davila, J., Lawrence, E., Rogge, R. D., Karney, B. R., … Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 15–27. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.15Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kim, H. K., Capaldi, D. M., & Crosby, L. (2007). Generalizability of Gottman and colleagues' affective process models of couples' relationship outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 55–72. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00343.xGoogle Scholar
Krakowski, M. (2003). Violence and serotonin: Influence of impulse control, affect regulation, and social functioning. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 15, 294–305. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15.3.294Google Scholar
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Misra, T. A., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. L. (2012). Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3, 199–230. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.199Google Scholar
Laurent, H., & Powers, S. (2007). Emotion regulation in emerging adult couples: Temperament, attachment, and HPA response to conflict. Biological Psychology, 76, 61–71. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.002Google Scholar
Madhyastha, T. M., Hamaker, E. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Investigating spousal influence using moment-to-moment affect data from marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 292–300. doi:10.1037/a0023028Google Scholar
Margolin, G., Burman, B., & John, R. S. (1989). Home observations of married couples reenacting naturalistic conflicts. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 101–118.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., & Hellmuth, J. C. (2008). Emotion regulation and intimate partner violence in newlyweds. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 794–797. doi:10.1037/a0013516Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E., Krueger, R. F., Caspi, A., & Fagan, J. (2000). Partner abuse and general crime: How are they the same? How are they different? Criminology, 38, 199–232. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00888.xGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
Norlander, B., & Eckhardt, C. (2005). Anger, hostility, and male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 119–152. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2004.10.001Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). A social learning approach: Antisocial boys (Vol. 4). Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Shorey, R. C., Brasfield, H., Febres, J., & Stuart, G. L. (2011). An examination of the association between difficulties with emotion regulation and dating violence perpetration. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 20, 870–885. doi:10.1080/10926771.2011.629342Google Scholar
Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L., & Idema, C. (2011). Trait anger as a mediator of difficulties with emotion regulation and female-perpetrated psychological aggression. Violence and Victims, 26, 271–282. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.26.3.271Google Scholar
Shortt, J. W., Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., Kerr, D. C. R., Owen, L. D., & Feingold, A. (2012). Stability of intimate partner violence by men across 12 years in young adulthood: Effects of relationship transitions. Prevention Science, 13, 360–369. doi:10.1007/s11121-011-0202-0Google Scholar
Shortt, J. W., Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Laurent, H. K. (2010). The effects of intimate partner violence on relationship satisfaction over time for young at-risk couples: The moderating role of observed negative and positive affect. Partner Abuse, 1, 131–151. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.1.2.131Google Scholar
Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.09.001Google Scholar
Stoolmiller, M., & Snyder, J. (2006). Modeling heterogeneity in social interaction processes using multilevel survival analysis. Psychological Methods, 11, 164–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.164Google Scholar
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.Google Scholar
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.Google Scholar
Tharp, A. T., Schumacher, J. A., Samper, R. E., McLeish, A. C., & Coffey, S. F. (2013). Relative importance of emotional dysregulation, hostility, and impulsiveness in predicting intimate partner violence perpetrated by men in alcohol treatment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 51–60. doi:10.1177/0361684312461138Google Scholar
White, H. R., & Widom, C. S. (2003). Intimate partner violence among abused and neglected children in young adulthood: The mediating effects of early aggression, antisocial personality, hostility and alcohol problems. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 332–345. doi:10.1002/ab.10074Google Scholar