Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:24:56.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Childhood abuse and neglect and insecure attachment states of mind in adulthood: Prospective, longitudinal evidence from a high-risk sample—CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

K. Lee Raby ,
Madelyn H. Labella ,
Jodi Martin ,
Elizabeth A. Carlson  and
Glenn I. Roisman
K. Lee Raby*
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Madelyn H. Labella
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Jodi Martin
Affiliation:
York University
Elizabeth A. Carlson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Glenn I. Roisman
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: K. Lee Raby, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 South 1530 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; E-mail: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 367 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

We recently identified five cases with minor errors regarding the chronicity of childhood abuse/neglect experiences (no other abuse/neglect parameters were affected by these errors) in our original article (Raby, Labella, Martin, Carlson, & Roisman, Reference Raby, Labella, Martin, Carlson and Roisman2017). The correlation between the original and the corrected measure of abuse/neglect chronicity was r = .99, and regression analyses involving the corrected measure indicated no changes regarding the statistical significance of the associations between abuse/neglect chronicity and the Adult Attachment Interview or Current Relationship Interview dimensions. Updated versions are presented of the three affected tables containing the results related to abuse/neglect chronicity.

In addition, the descriptive information for the abuse and neglect codes originally included on page 351 should be amended as follows:

For the entire Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation sample, 47 individuals were classified as being abused and/or neglected in infancy and 66 were classified in early childhood. For the subsample of 164 participants included in the analyses we reported originally (Raby et al., Reference Raby, Labella, Martin, Carlson and Roisman2017), of those who experienced abuse and/or neglect, 36% experienced abuse and/or neglect in infancy, 65% during early childhood, 72% during middle childhood, and 23% during adolescence (not mutually exclusive). Regarding chronicity, 34% of this group experienced abuse and/or neglect during one developmental period, 33% during two periods, 23% during three periods, 3% during all four developmental periods, and 8% of participants had insufficient data to determine the number of developmental periods (numbers sum to more than 100% because of rounding).

We regret this error and any problems it may have caused.

References

Raby, K. L., Labella, M. H., Martin, J., Carlson, E. A., & Roisman, G. I. (2017). Childhood abuse and neglect and insecure attachment states of mind in adulthood: Prospective, longitudinal evidence from a high-risk sample. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 347–363. doi:10.1017/S0954579417000037 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed