Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:53:20.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A brief video-coaching intervention buffers young children's vulnerability to the impact of caregivers’ depressive symptoms: Examination of differential susceptibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2021

Sihong Liu Open the ORCID record for Sihong Liu [Opens in a new window] ,
Philip A. Fisher ,
Lisa J. Schlueter ,
Tiffany Phu ,
Megan R. Gunnar  and
Sarah E. Watamura
Sihong Liu*
Affiliation:
Center for Translational Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Philip A. Fisher
Affiliation:
Center for Translational Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Lisa J. Schlueter
Affiliation:
Early Childhood Mental Health, Colorado Department of Human Services, Denver, CO, USA
Tiffany Phu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
Megan R. Gunnar
Affiliation:
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Sarah E. Watamura
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
*
Author for Correspondence: Sihong Liu, Center for Translational Neuroscience, University of Oregon, 1227 University Street, Eugene, OR97403, USA; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Informed by the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and developmental psychopathology frameworks, the current study used cortisol area under the curve with respect to ground (AUCg) as an index of differential sensitivity to context, which was expected to predispose young children with elevated vulnerability to adverse caregiving experiences and adaptive sensitivity to intervention effects. Particularly, the study aimed to determine whether improving caregivers’ responsive parenting through the Filming Interactions to Nurture Development (FIND) intervention would buffer children's biologically embedded vulnerability to caregivers’ depressive symptoms. Data were derived from a randomized controlled trial using pretest–posttest design with low-income families of children aged 4 to 36 months (N = 91). Young children's differential sensitivity was measured using cortisol AUCg during a structured stress paradigm. As hypothesized, children whose cortisol AUCg indicated greater sensitivity to social context exhibited more internalizing and externalizing behaviors in relation to caregivers’ elevated depressive symptoms. Critically, the intervention program was effective in attenuating psychopathology symptoms among the more biologically sensitive children. As proven by rigorous statistical tests, the findings of this study partially supported the differential susceptibility hypotheses, indicating both greater vulnerability to adverse conditions and responsiveness to intervention among children with high levels of cortisol AUCg.

Keywords

differential susceptibilityinternalizing and externalizing problemsResearch Domain Criteriavideo feedback intervention
Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 33 , Special Issue 5: Applying RDoC-Informed Approaches to the Study of Development and Psychopathology , December 2021 , pp. 1685 - 1700
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T., & Rescorla, L. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: An integrated system of multi-informant assessment. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Axberg, U., Hansson, K., Broberg, A. G., & Wirtberg, I. (2006). The development of a systemic school-based intervention: Marte Meo and coordination meetings. Family Process, 45, 375–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balldin, S., Fisher, P. A., & Wirtberg, I. (2018). Video feedback intervention with children: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 28, 682–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsegyan, A., Mackenzie, S. M., Kurose, B. D., McGaugh, J. L., & Roozendaal, B. (2010). Glucocorticoids in the prefrontal cortex enhance memory consolidation and impair working memory by a common neural mechanism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 16655–16660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J. (2005). Differential susceptibility to rearing influence. In Ellis, B. J., & Bjorklund, D. F. (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 139–163). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernard, K., & Dozier, M. (2010). Examining infants’ cortisol responses to laboratory tasks among children varying in attachment disorganization: Stress reactivity or return to baseline? Developmental Psychology, 46, 1771–1778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary–developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggs, R. D., Silver, E. J., Krug, L. M., Mason, Z. S., Schrag, R. D., Chinitz, S., & Racine, A. D. (2014). Healthy steps as a moderator: The impact of maternal trauma on child social-emotional development. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 2, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. M., Schlueter, L. J., Hurwich-Reiss, E., Dmitrieva, J., Miles, E., & Watamura, S. E. (2020). Parental buffering in the context of poverty: Positive parenting behaviors differentiate young children's stress reactivity profiles. Development and Psychopathology, 32, 1778–1787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, J. G., Shaver, P. R., Li, C.-S., & Minzenberg, M. J. (2011). Childhood maltreatment, adult attachment, and depression as predictors of parental self-efficacy in at-risk mothers. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20, 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, K. L., Scaramella, L. V., Laird, R. D., & Sohr-Preston, S. L. (2011). Neighborhood disadvantage as a moderator of the association between harsh parenting and toddler-aged children's internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 68–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, A., & Briggs-Gowan, M. (2005). Infant toddler and brief infant toddler social and emotional assessment (ITSEA)(BITSEA) manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 597–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014). The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 13, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11, 126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2017). Statistical tests of differential susceptibility: Performance, limitations, and improvements. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B. J., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2011). The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1562–1592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dozier, M., Peloso, E., Lewis, E., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Levine, S. (2008). Effects of an attachment-based intervention on the cortisol production of infants and toddlers in foster care. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 845–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dressendörfer, R., Kirschbaum, C., Rohde, W., Stahl, F., & Strasburger, C. (1992). Synthesis of a cortisol-biotin conjugate and evaluation as a tracer in an immunoassay for salivary cortisol measurement. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 43, 683–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckshtain, D., Marchette, L. K., Schleider, J., Evans, S., & Weisz, J. R. (2019). Parental depressive symptoms as a predictor of outcome in the treatment of child internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47, 459–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Essex, M. J., & Boyce, W. T. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: II. Empirical explorations of an evolutionary–developmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fekedulegn, D. B., Andrew, M. E., Burchfiel, C. M., Violanti, J. M., Hartley, T. A., Charles, L. E., & Miller, D. B. (2007). Area under the curve and other summary indicators of repeated waking cortisol measurements. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 651–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, P. A., Frenkel, T. I., Noll, L. K., Berry, M., & Yockelson, M. (2016). Promoting healthy child development via a two-generation translational neuroscience framework: The Filming Interactions to Nurture Development video coaching program. Child Development Perspectives, 10, 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinn, M. V. (2006). Evolution and ontogeny of stress response to social challenges in the human child. Developmental Review, 26, 138–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. C., Jamieson, J. P., Glenn, C. R., & Nock, M. K. (2015). How developmental psychopathology theory and research can inform the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, S. H., Rouse, M. H., Connell, A. M., Broth, M. R., Hall, C. M., & Heyward, D. (2011). Maternal depression and child psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnar, M. R., & Fisher, P. A. (2006). Bringing basic research on early experience and stress neurobiology to bear on preventive interventions for neglected and maltreated children. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 651–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnar, M. R., & Quevedo, K. (2007). The neurobiology of stress and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 145–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnar, M. R., & Vazquez, D. (2006). Stress neurobiology and developmental psychopathology. Developmental Psychopathology, 2, 533–577.Google Scholar
Hammen, C., Brennan, P. A., & Shih, J. H. (2004). Family discord and stress predictors of depression and other disorders in adolescent children of depressed and nondepressed women. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 994–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstra, M. B., & Verhulst, F. C. (2000). Continuity and change of psychopathology from childhood into adulthood: A 14-year follow-up study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 850–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, S. R., Fisher, P. A., Pfeifer, J. H., Allen, N. B., & Berkman, E. T. (2020). Levers and barriers to success in the use of translational neuroscience for the prevention and treatment of mental health and promotion of well-being across the lifespan. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., … Wang, P. (2010). Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Jaccard, J. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, P., & Garber, J. (2009). Parental depression and child externalizing and internalizing symptoms: Unique effects of fathers’ symptoms and perceived conflict as a mediator. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopala-Sibley, D. C., Dougherty, L. R., Dyson, M. W., Laptook, R. S., Olino, T. M., Bufferd, S. J., & Klein, D. N. (2017). Early childhood cortisol reactivity moderates the effects of parent–child relationship quality on the development of children's temperament in early childhood. Developmental Science, 20, e12378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kudielka, B. M., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2007). Ten years of research with the Trier Social Stress Test–Revisited. In Harmon-Jones, E. & Winkielman, P. (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 56–83). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kudielka, B. M., Schommer, N. C., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2004). Acute HPA axis responses, heart rate, and mood changes to psychosocial stress (TSST) in humans at different times of day. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 983–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leahy-Warren, P., McCarthy, G., & Corcoran, P. (2012). First-time mothers: Social support, maternal parental self-efficacy and postnatal depression. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 388–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., Roberts, R. E., & Allen, N. B. (1997). Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S., Phu, T., Dominguez, A., Hurwich-Reiss, E., McGee, D., Watamura, S. E., … Fisher, P. A. (2021). Improving caregiver self-efficacy and children's behavioral outcomes via a brief strength-based video coaching intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s11121-021-01251-6Google Scholar
Love, J. M., Chazan-Cohen, R., Raikes, H., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2013). What makes a difference: Early Head Start evaluation findings in a developmental context. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78, vii–viii., 1.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, M. C., Graczyk, P. A., O'Hare, E., & Neuman, G. (2000). Maternal depression and parenting behavior: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 561–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mäntymaa, M., Puura, K., Luoma, I., Latva, R., Salmelin, R. K., & Tamminen, T. (2012). Predicting internalizing and externalizing problems at five years by child and parental factors in infancy and toddlerhood. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 43, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mckelvey, L., Schiffman, R. F., Brophy-Herb, H. E., Bocknek, E. L., Fitzgerald, H. E., Reischl, T. M., … Cunningham Deluca, M. (2015). Examining long-term effects of an infant mental health home-based Early Head Start program on family strengths and resilience. Infant Mental Health Journal, 36, 353–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McRae, A. L., Saladin, M. E., Brady, K. T., Upadhyaya, H., Back, S. E., & Timmerman, M. A. (2006). Stress reactivity: Biological and subjective responses to the cold pressor and trier social stressors. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 21, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, V. A., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2017). Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) grows up: Strengthening neurodevelopmental investigation within the RDoC framework. Journal of Affective Disorders, 216, 30–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressive disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 406–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Mplus. The comprehensive modelling program for applied researchers: user's guide, 5. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Nezhad, M. A. S., Khodapanahi, M. K., Yekta, M., Mahmoodikahriz, B., & Ostadghafour, S. (2011). Defense styles in internalizing and externalizing disorders. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obradović, J., Bush, N. R., Stamperdahl, J., Adler, N. E., & Boyce, W. T. (2010). Biological sensitivity to context: The interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity on socioemotional behavior and school readiness. Child Development, 81, 270–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortiz, C., & Del Vecchio, T. (2013). Cultural diversity: Do we need a new wake-up call for parent training? Behavior Therapy, 44, 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardini, D., White, H. R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2007). Early adolescent psychopathology as a predictor of alcohol use disorders by young adulthood. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 88, S38–S49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pruessner, J. C., Kirschbaum, C., Meinlschmid, G., & Hellhammer, D. H. (2003). Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 28, 916–931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reising, M. M., Watson, K. H., Hardcastle, E. J., Merchant, M. J., Roberts, L., Forehand, R., & Compas, B. E. (2013). Parental depression and economic disadvantage: The role of parenting in associations with internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 335–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis–stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 389–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, D. L., Ackerman, M. L., Okonkwo, O. C., & Burgio, L. D. (2008). The four-factor model of depressive symptoms in dementia caregivers: A structural equation model of ethnic differences. Psychology and Aging, 23, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M., & Munck, A. U. (2000). How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocrine Reviews, 21, 55–89.Google ScholarPubMed
Schindler, H. S., Fisher, P. A., & Shonkoff, J. P. (2017). From innovation to impact at scale: Lessons learned from a cluster of research–community partnerships. Child Development, 88, 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serbin, L. A., Kingdon, D., Ruttle, P. L., & Stack, D. M. (2015). The impact of children's internalizing and externalizing problems on parenting: Transactional processes and reciprocal change over time. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 969–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shonkoff, J. P., & Bales, S. N. (2011). Science does not speak for itself: Translating child development research for the public and its policymakers. Child Development, 82, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somers, J. A., Luecken, L. J., Spinrad, T. L., & Crnic, K. A. (2019). Biological sensitivity to the effects of maternal postpartum depressive symptoms on children's behavior problems. Child Development, 90, e888–e900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, A. D., Benoit, R., Breslend, N. L., Vreeland, A., Compas, B., & Forehand, R. (2019). Cumulative socioeconomic status risk and observations of parent depression: Are there associations with child outcomes? Journal of Family Psychology, 33(8), 883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vreeland, A., Gruhn, M. A., Watson, K. H., Bettis, A. H., Compas, B. E., Forehand, R., & Sullivan, A. D. (2019). Parenting in context: Associations of parental depression and socioeconomic factors with parenting behaviors. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 1124–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, J. V., Schür, R. R., Boks, M. P., Kahn, R. S., Joëls, M., & Vinkers, C. H. (2017). Cortisol stress reactivity across psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 77, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Liu et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figures S1-S2

Download Liu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 415.6 KB