Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:51:19.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benefits and pitfalls in the merging of disciplines: The example of developmental psychopathology and the study of persons with autism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2002

JACOB A. BURACK
Affiliation:
McGill University Hôpital Rivière des Prairies, Montréal
GRACE IAROCCI
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
DERMOT BOWLER
Affiliation:
City University, London
LAURENT MOTTRON
Affiliation:
Hôpital Rivière des Prairies, Montréal Université de Montréal

Extract

Recent advances in the discipline of developmental psychopathology highlight the contributions of developmental thought to the study of persons with autism. This article briefly outlines primary developmental innovations in theory, methodology, and the interpretation of findings. Specifically, we discuss two sets of issues that arise from the general notion of developmental level. One set is relevant to the choice of persons that comprise the comparison group and the other to the various implications of the subjects' levels of functioning. In sum, we contend that researchers need to frame their empirical work within the context of developmental theory and methodology and interpret their findings accordingly. This will lead to scientifically compelling work and an increasingly heuristic approach to the study of persons with autism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)