Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Roux, Sylvie
Malvy, Joëlle
Bruneau, Nicole
Garreau, Bernard
Guérin, Pascaline
Sauvage, Dominique
and
Barthélémy, Catherine
1995.
Identification of behaviour profiles within a population of autistic children using multivariate statistical methods.
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 4,
p.
249.
Rast, Mechthild
and
Meltzoff, Andrew N.
1995.
Memory and representation in young children with Down syndrome: Exploring deferred imitation and object permanence.
Development and Psychopathology,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
393.
Oosterwegel, Annerieke
1996.
Social relations and understanding the intentional self.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
136.
Gordon, Robert M.
1996.
First person representations need a methodology based on simulation or theory.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
130.
Hobson, R. Peter
1996.
Understanding minds and selves.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
132.
Rogers, Sally J.
Bennetto, Loisa
McEvoy, Robin
and
Pennington, Bruce F.
1996.
Imitation and Pantomime in High-Functioning Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Child Development,
Vol. 67,
Issue. 5,
p.
2060.
Barresi, John
and
Moore, Chris
1996.
Intentional relations and social understanding.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
107.
Premack, David
and
Premack, Ann James
1996.
Intentional schema will not do the work of a theory of mind.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
138.
Csibra, Gergely
and
Gergely, György
1996.
On the dangers of oversimulation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
127.
Dwyer, Susan
1996.
Moral competence is cognitive but (perhaps) nonmodular.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
128.
Nelson, Katherine
1996.
Four-year-old humans are different: Why?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
134.
Gomez, Juan Carlos
1996.
Second person intentional relations and the evolution of social understanding.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
129.
Reddy, Vasudevi
1996.
Omitting the second person in social understanding.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Allen, Colin
1996.
Comparative cognitive studies, not folk phylogeny, please.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
122.
Povinelli, Daniel J.
Zebouni, Mia C.
and
Prince, Christopher G.
1996.
Ontogeny, evolution, and folk psychology.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Barresi, John
and
Moore, Chris
1996.
Understanding self and other.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
142.
Baron-Cohen, Simon
1996.
Can children with autism integrate first and third person representations?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
123.
Olson, David R.
and
Homer, Bruce
1996.
Understanding that looking causes knowing.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Slater, Carol
1996.
Are blind babies delayed in achieving social understanding?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
141.
Budwig, Nancy
and
Bamberg, Michael
1996.
Language and its role in understanding intentional relations: Research tool or mechanism of development?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
125.