Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T05:54:54.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

To what extent can children with autism understand desire?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2009

Wendy Phillips*
Affiliation:
MRC Child Psychiatry Unit and Department of Child Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London
Simon Baron-Cohen
Affiliation:
MRC Child Psychiatry Unit and Department of Child Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London
Michael Rutter
Affiliation:
MRC Child Psychiatry Unit and Department of Child Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London
*
Wendy Phillips, MRC Child Psychiatry Unit, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.

Abstract

Previous studies of theory of mind abilities in young people with autism have found that their understanding of false belief is specifically impaired, but that simple aspects of desire are understood in line with mental age. We explored the possibility that more complex aspects of desire (in which comparison of goals with outcomes is not a sufficient strategy) are not understood by children with autism. In two experiments, we found that these children were specifically impaired in understanding desire satisfaction and desire change, when compared with children with mental handicap and normal 4-6-year-olds. Although there was some evidence that understanding of desires may be easier for individuals with autism than understanding false belief, it would appear that they have difficulties in understanding both epistemic and volitional mental states.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astington, J. W. (1991). Intention in the child's theory of mind. In Frye, D. & Moore, C. (Eds.), Children's theories of mind: Mental states and social understanding (pp. 157172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Astington, J. (1994). The Child's Discovery of the Mind. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Astington, J., & Gopnik, A. (1991). Developing understanding of desire and intention. In Whiten, A. (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 3950). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Astington, J. W., Gopnik, A., & O'Neill, D. (1989) Young children's understanding of unfulfilled desire and false belief. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Astington, J., & Lee, E. (04, 1991). What do children know about intentional causation? Paper presented at the SRCD Conference, Seattle, Washington, 04, 1991.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285298.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1991a). Do people with autism understand what causes emotion? Child Development, 62, 385395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S. (1991b). The development of a theory of mind in autism: Deviance and delay? Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 3351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S. (1993). From attention-goal psychology to belief-desire psychology: The development of a theory of mind and its dysfunction. In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 5982). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1994). How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 13, 513552.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 3746.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1986). Mechanical, behavioural and intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 113125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beeghly, M., Weiss-Perry, B., & Cicchetti, D. (1990). Beyond sensorimotor functioning: early communicative and play development of children with Down syndrome. In Cicchetti, D. & Beeghly, M. (Eds.), Children with Down syndrome: A developmental perspective (pp. 329368). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. (1989). Test for reception of grammar. Medical Research Council, U.K.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Pogge-Hesse, P. (1982). Possible contributions of the study of organically retarded persons to developmental theory. In Zigler, E. & Balla, D. (Eds.), Mental retardation: The developmental-difference controversy. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Collis, G. (1992). Statistical methods for use with categorical data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1978). Brainstorms. Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (1991). Young children's understanding of other people: Evidence from observations within the family. In Frye, D. & Moore, C. (Eds.), Children's theories of mind: Mental states and social understanding (pp. 97114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., Green, F. L., & Moses, L. F. (1990). Young children's understanding of fact beliefs versus value beliefs. Child Development, 61, 915928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind.” Cognition, 50, 115132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, M. V., & Thorpe, J. G. (1983). Personality stereotype of noninstitutionalized Down syndrome children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87, 601605.Google Scholar
Hadwin, J., & Perner, J. (1991). Pleased and surprised: Children's cognitive theory of emotion. In Butterworth, G., Harris, P. L., Leslie, A. M., & Wellman, H. (Eds.), Perspectives on the child's theory of mind (pp. 215234). Oxford: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Current psychological theories of autism: The “Theory of Mind” account and rival theories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 215230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L. (1989). Children and Emotion: The Development of Psychological Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., & Muncer, A. (09, 1988). The autistic child's understanding of beliefs and desires. Paper presented at BPS Developmental Section Annual Conference, Coleg Harlech.Google Scholar
Hobson, R. P., Ouston, J., & Lee, A. (1989). Naming emotion in faces and voices: Abilities and disabilities in autism and mental retardation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 237250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, Y., & Tamhayne, A. C. (1987). Multiple comparison procedures. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Howlin, P. (1984). The acquisition of grammatical morphemes in autistic children: A critique and replication of the findings of Bartolucci, Pierce and Streiner, 1980. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 14, 127136.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. H., & Russell, J. (1993). Autistic children's difficulty with mental disengagement from an object: Its implications for theories of autism. Developmental Psychology, 29, 498510.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. (1994). ToMM, ToBy and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In Hirchfield, L. & Gelman, S. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1988). Autistic children's understanding of seeing, knowing and believing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 315324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, C., Schopler, E., & Revicki, D. (1982). Sex differences in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 12, 317330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loveland, K. A., McEvoy, R. E., Kelley, M. L., & Tunali, B. (1990). Narrative story-telling in autism and Down's syndrome. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. London: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekam, S. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child's theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 60, 689700.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. L. (1993). Understanding desire and intention by children with autism. Unpublished PhD thesis, Institute of Psychiatry, University London.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M. (1995). Lucky breaks and mistaken outcomes: Understanding of intention by children with autism. Unpublished manuscript, Institute of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1990). The infant's theory of selfpropelled objects. Cognition, 36, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1990). Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1978). Diagnosis and definition. In Rutter, M. & Schopler, E. (Eds.), Autism: A reappraisal of concepts and treatment (pp. 125). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M. (1983). Cognitive deficits in the pathogenesis of autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 513531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shultz, T. R., Wells, D., & Sarda, M. (1980). Development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistakes, reflexes, and passive movements. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 301310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sodian, B., & Frith, U. (1992). Deception and sabotage in autistic, retarded, and normal children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 591606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1989). A psycholinguistic perspective on language development in the autistic child. In Dawson, G. (Ed.), Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 92115). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H. (05, 1991). The development of modal verbs in autistic and Down's syndrome children. Paper presented at the Gatlinburg Conference on Research and Theory in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Key Biscayne, Florida.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1993). What language reveals about the understanding of minds in children with autism. In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 138157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H., Calkins, S., Nolin, T., Baumberger, T., Anderson, M., & Chadwick-Dias, A. (1990). A longitudinal study of language acquisition in autistic and Down's syndrome children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 122.Google Scholar
Tan, J., & Harris, P. (1991). Autistic children understand seeing and wanting. Development and Psychopathology, 3, 163174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, S. J., & Hobson, R. P. (1987). The salience of facial expression for autistic children. Journal Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28, 137152.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M., & Woolley, J. D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35, 245275.Google Scholar
Yuill, N. (1984). Young children's coordination of motive and outcome in judgements of satisfaction and morality. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 7381.Google Scholar