Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T01:34:40.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperamental exuberance and executive function predict propensity for risk taking in childhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2012

Ayelet Lahat ,
Kathryn A. Degnan ,
Lauren K. White ,
Jennifer Martin McDermott ,
Heather A. Henderson ,
C. W. Lejuez  and
Nathan A. Fox
Ayelet Lahat*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Kathryn A. Degnan
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Lauren K. White
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Jennifer Martin McDermott
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Heather A. Henderson
Affiliation:
University of Miami, Coral Gables
C. W. Lejuez
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Nathan A. Fox
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ayelet Lahat, Department of Human Development, 3304 Benjamin Building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study utilized a multilevel approach to examine developmental trajectories in risk-taking propensity. We examined the moderating role of specific executive function components, attention shifting and inhibitory control, on the link between exuberant temperament in infancy and propensity for risk taking in childhood. Risk taking was assessed using a task previously associated with sensation seeking and antisocial behaviors. Two hundred ninety-one infants were brought into the lab and behaviors reflecting exuberance were observed at 4, 9, 24, and 36 months of age. Executive function was assessed at 48 months of age. Risk-taking propensity was measured when children were 60 months of age. The results indicated that exuberance and attention shifting, but not inhibitory control, significantly interacted to predict propensity for risk taking. Exuberance was positively associated with risk-taking propensity among children who were relatively low in attention shifting but unrelated for children high in attention shifting. These findings illustrated the multifinality of developmental outcomes for temperamentally exuberant young children and pointed to the distinct regulatory influences of different executive functions for children of differing temperaments. Attention shifting likely affords a child the ability to consider both positive and negative consequences and moderates the relation between early exuberance and risk-taking propensity.

Type
Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Multilevel Approaches Toward Understanding Antisocial Behavior: Current Research and Future Directions , August 2012 , pp. 847 - 856
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, G. M. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., & McFarland, C. F. (2006). Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnett, J. J. (2001). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Borawski, E. A., Levers-Landis, C. E., Lovegreen, L. D., & Trapl, E. S. (2003). Parental monitoring, negotiated unsupervised time, and parental trust: The role of perceived parenting practices in adolescent health risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 60–70.Google Scholar
Bornovalova, M. A., Cashman-Rolls, A., O'Donnell, J. M., Ettinger, K., Richards, J. B., deWit, H., et al. (2009). Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, & Behavior, 93, 258–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunge, S. A., & Crone, E. A. (2009). Neural correlates of the development of cognitive control. In Rumsey, J. & Ernst, M. (Eds.), Neuroimaging in developmental clinical neuroscience (pp. 22–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calkins, S. D., Fox, N. A., & Marshall, T. R. (1996). Behavioral and physiological antecedents of inhibited and uninhibited behavior. Child Development, 67, 523–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child Development, 72, 1032–1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, B. J., Epstein, J. N., Buhle, J., Liston, C., Davidson, M. C., Tonev, S. T., et al. (2007). Frontostriatal connectivity and its role in cognitive control in parent–child dyads with ADHD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 1729–1736.Google Scholar
Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brian. Developmental Review, 28, 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Milne, B., Amell, J. W., Theodore, R. F., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Children's behavioral styles at age 3 are linked to their adult personality traits at age 26. Journal of Personality, 71, 495–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Newman, D. L., & Silva, P. A. (1996). Behavioral observations at age 3 years predict adult psychiatric disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 1033–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cauffman, E., Shulman, E. P., Steinberg, L., Claus, E., Banich, M. T., Graham, S. J., et al. (2010). Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa gambling task. Developmental Psychology, 46, 193–207.Google Scholar
Chein, J., Albert, D., O'Brien, L., Uckert, K., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14, F1–F10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and multifinality in developmental outcome. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 597–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (2009). The past achievements and future promises of developmental psychopathology: The coming of age of a discipline. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicchetti, D., & Valentino, K. (2007). Toward the application of a multiple-levels-of-analysis perspective to research in development and psychopathology. In Masten, A. (Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 243–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Degnan, K. A., & Fox, N. A. (2007). Behavioral inhibition and anxiety disorders: Multiple levels of a resilience process. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 729–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degnan, K. A., Hane, A. A., Henderson, H. A., Moas, O. L., Reeb-Sutherland, B. C., & Fox, N. A. (2011). Longitudinal stability of temperamental exuberance and social–emotional outcomes in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 47, 765–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–517.Google Scholar
DiClemente, R. J., Hansen, W. B., & Ponton, L. E. (1995). Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Dowsett, S., & Livesey, D. J. (2000). The development of inhibitory control in pre-school children: Effects of “executive skills” training. Developmental Psychobiology, 36, 161–174.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Poulin, R., & Shepard, S. (1996). The relations of regulation and emotionality to problem behavior in elementary school children. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Sadovsky, A., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Losoya, S. H., Valiente, C., et al. (2005). The relations of problem behavior status to children's negative emotionality, effortful control, and impulsivity: Concurrent relations and prediction of change. Developmental Psychology, 41, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia card task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 35, 709–730.Google Scholar
Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., Marshall, P. J., Nichols, K. E., & Ghera, M. M. (2005). Behavioral inhibition: Linking biology and behavior within a developmental framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 235–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., Rubin, K. H., Calkins, S. D., & Schmidt, L. A. (2001). Continuity and discontinuity of behavioral inhibition and exuberance: Psychophysiological and behavioral influences across the first four years of life. Child Development, 72, 1–21.Google Scholar
Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 3 1/2–7 years old on a Stroop-like Day–Night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. (1959). Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis and latent profile analysis. Psychometrika, 24, 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, H. H., & Rothbart, M. K. (1999). The Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (Lab-TAB): Pre-locomotor version 3.1. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the function of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hane, A. A., Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., & Marshall, P. J. (2008). Behavioral reactivity and approach–withdrawal bias in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1491–1496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, J., Reznick, J. S., & Snidman, N. (1988). Biological bases of childhood shyness. Science, 240, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, J., & Snidman, N. (1991). Temperamental factors in human development. American Psychologist, 46, 856–862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, J. J., Reznick, S., & Snidman, N. (1987). The physiology and psychology of behavioral inhibition in children. Child Development, 58, 1459–1473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kieras, J. E., Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). You can't always get what you want: Effortful control and children's responses to undesirable gifts. Psychological Science, 16, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J., Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., & Manly, J. T. (2009). Child maltreatment and trajectories of personality and behavioral functioning: Implications for the development of personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 889–912.Google Scholar
Kloo, D., & Perner, J. (2003). Training transfer between card sorting and false belief understanding: Helping children apply conflicting descriptions. Child Development, 74, 1823–1839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G. (1995). Children's temperament, mother's discipline, and security of attachment: Multiple pathways to emerging internalization. Child Development, 66, 597–615.Google Scholar
Kreek, M. J., Nielsen, D. A., Butelman, E. R., & LaForge, K. S. (2005). Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk-taking, stress, responsivity, and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1450–1457.Google Scholar
Lahat, A., Hong, M., & Fox, N. A. (2011). Behavioral inhibition: Is it a risk factor for anxiety? International Review of Psychiatry, 23, 248–257.Google Scholar
Leigh, B. C. (1999). Peril, chance, and adventure: Concepts of risk, alcohol use and risky behavior in young adults. Addiction, 94, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Bornovalova, M. A., & Moolchan, E. T. (2005). Differences in risk-taking propensity across inner city adolescent ever and never-smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Daughters, S., Zvolensky, M. J., Kahler, C., & Gwadz, M. (2007). Reliability and validity of the youth version of the balloon analogue risk task (BART-Y) in the assessment of risk-taking behavior among inner city adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 106–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Jones, H. A., Strong, D. R., Richards, J. B., Kahler, C. W., et al. (2003). The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 26–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Pedulla, C. M. (2003). Evaluation of the balloon analogue risk task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviors. Journal of adolescence, 26, 475–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., et al. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk-taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Liston, C., Watts, R., Tottenham, N., Davidson, M. C., Niogi, S., Ulug, A. M., et al. (2006). Frontostriatal microstructure modulates efficient recruitment of cognitive control. Cerebal Cortex, 16, 553–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonigan, C. J., & Vasey, M. W. (2009). Negative affectivity, effortful control, and attention to threat-relevant stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 387–399.Google Scholar
Lusher, J. M., Chandler, C., & Ball, D. (2001). Dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) is associated with novelty seeking (NS) and substance abuse: The saga continues. Molecular Psychiatry, 6, 497–499.Google Scholar
Lynam, D., Moffitt, T., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1993). Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacPherson, L., Magidson, J. M., Reynolds, E. K., Kahler, C. W., & Lejuez, C. W. (2010). Changes in sensation seeking and risk-taking propensity predict increases in alcohol use among early adolescents. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34, 1400–1408.Google Scholar
Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., et al. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58, 449–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noble, K. G., Norman, M. F., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Neurocognitive correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Developmental Science, 8, 74–87.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Park, S., Belsky, J., Putnam, S., & Crnic, K. (1997). Infant emotionality, parenting, and 3-year inhibition: Exploring stability and lawful discontinuity in a male sample. Developmental Psychology, 33, 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Edgar, K., & Fox, N. A. (2005a). Temperament and anxiety disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 681–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Edgar, K., & Fox, N. A. (2005b). A behavioral and electrophysiological study of children's selective attention under neutral and affective conditions. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 89–118.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, M., Goldsmith, H. H., Davidson, R. J., & Rickman, M. (2002). Continuity and change in inhibited and uninhibited children. Child Development, 73, 1474–1485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polak-Toste, C. P., & Gunnar, M. R. (2006). Temperamental exuberance: Correlates and consequences. In Marshall, P. J. & Fox, N. A. (Eds.), The development of social engagement (pp. 19–45). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, S. P., & Stifter, C. A. (2005). Behavioral approach-inhibition in toddlers: Prediction from infancy, positive and negative affective components, and relations with behavior problems. Child Development, 76, 212–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Hershey, K. L. (1994). Temperament and social behavior in childhood. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 40, 21–39.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In Damon, W. & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 99–166). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Developing mechanisms of temperamental effortful control. Journal of Personality, 71, 1113–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schinka, J. A., Letsch, E. A., & Crawford, F. C. (2002). DRD4 and novelty seeking: Results of meta-analyses. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 114, 643–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somerville, L. H., & Casey, B. J. (2010). Developmental neurobiology of cognitive control and motivational systems. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20, 236–241.Google Scholar
Stifter, C. A., Putnam, S., & Jahromi, L. (2008). Exuberant and inhibited toddlers: Stability of temperament and risk for problem behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 401–421.Google Scholar
Wallsten, T. S., Pleskac, T. J., & Lejuez, C. W. (2005). Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psychological Review, 112, 862–880.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2002). WPPSI-III administration and scoring manual. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
White, L. K., McDermott, J. M., Degnan, K. A., Henderson, H. A., & Fox, N. A. (2011). Behavioral inhibition and anxiety: The moderating roles of inhibitory control and attention shifting. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 735–747.Google Scholar
White, T. L., Lejuez, C. W., & de Wit, H. (2007). Personality and gender differences in effects of d-amphetamine on risk taking. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15, 599–609.Google Scholar
White, T. L., Lejuez, C. W., & de Wit, H. (2008). Test–retest characteristics of the ballon analogue risk task (BART). Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16, 565–570.Google Scholar
Williams, L. R., Fox, N. A., Lejuez, C. W., Reynolds, E. K., Henderson, H. A., Pérez-Edgar, K. E., et al. (2010). Early temperament, propensity for risk-taking and adolescent substance-related problems: A prospective multi-method investigation. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 1148–1151.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D. (2006). The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocols, 1, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelazo, P. D., Carlson, S. M., & Kesek, A. (2008). Development of executive function in childhood. In Nelson, C. A. & Luciana, M. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 553–574). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Ball, S., & Black, J. (1990). Influences of sensation seeking, gender, risk appraisal, and situational motivation on smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 209–220.Google Scholar