Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:39:00.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic mediation of longitudinal associations between family environment and childhood behavior problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2009

Julia Braungart-Rieker ,
Richard D. Rende ,
Robert Plomin ,
J. C. DeFries  and
David W. Fulker
Julia Braungart-Rieker*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame
Richard D. Rende
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University
Robert Plomin
Affiliation:
Center for Development and Health Genetics and Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University
J. C. DeFries
Affiliation:
Institute for Behavioral Genetics and Department of Psychology, University of Colorado-Boulder
David W. Fulker
Affiliation:
Institute for Behavioral Genetics and Department of Psychology, University of Colorado-Boulder
*
Julia Braungart-Rieker, Haggar Hall, Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies have reported significant associations between measures of the family environment and behavior problems in children. However, because children in these studies were genetically related to their parents, such links may not be caused solely by environmental influences. The goal of this study was to investigate genetic influence on associations between family environment and problem behavior using an adoption design. Participants in the study included 179 adopted and 176 nonadopted children, as well as their parents and teachers, in the Colorado Adoption Project (CAP; Plomin, DeFries, & Fulker, 1988). Mothers and fathers each completed the Family Environment Scale (FES) when their child was 1, 3, and 5 years of age; the child's problem behavior at age 7 was rated by both mothers and teachers using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Patterns of correlations for nonadopted versus adopted boys indicated that associations between aspects of the family's relationship (conflict, cohesion, expressiveness) and behavior problems in home and school were mediated genetically. For girls, however, these links appeared to be influenced by direct shared environmental effects.

Type
Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Spring 1995 , pp. 233 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist 4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the teacher's report form and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin. 101, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Afifi, A. A., & Clark, V. (1984). Computer-aided multivariate analysis. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Baker, L. A., Ho, H., & Reynolds, C. (1994). Sex differences in genetic and environmental influences for cognitive abilities. In DeFries, J. C., Plomin, R., & Fulker, D. W. (Eds.), Nature and nurture during middle childhood (pp. 181–200). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, L. A., Moffitt, T. E., Mack, W., & Mednick, S. A. (1989). Sex differences in property criminality in a Danish adoption cohort. Behavior Genetics, 19, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Braungart, J. M., Fulker, D. F., & Plomin, R. (1992). Genetic mediation of the home environment during infancy: A sibling adoption study of the HOME. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1048–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, R. H. (1978). Home Observation and Measurement of the Environment. Little Rock: University of Arkansas Press.Google Scholar
Dadds, M. R. (1987). Families and the origins of child behavior problems. Family Process, 26, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behavior Genetics, 15, 467–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeFries, J. C., Plomin, R., & Fulker, D. W. (1994). Nature and nurture during middle childhood. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1990). Separate lives: Why siblings are so different. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Emery, R. E. (1982). Interparental conflict and children of discord and divorce. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 310–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emery, R. E., & O'Leary, K. D. (1984). Marital discord and child behavior problems in a nonclinic sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghodsian-Carpey, J., & Baker, L. A. (1987). Genetic and environmental influences on aggression in 4 and 7-year-old twins. Aggressive behavior, 13, 173–186.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, A. C., Berg, K., Eaves, L. J., Solaas, M. H., Corey, L. A., Sundet, J., Magnus, P., & Nance, W. E. (1985). Educational policy and the heritability of educational attainment. Nature, 314, 734–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In Hetherington, E. M. (Vol. ed.) & Mussen, P. H. (General Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development (Vol. 4). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McGee, R., Silva, P. A., & Williams, S. (1984). Perinatal, neurological, environmental and developmental characteristics of seven-year-old children with stable behavior problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25, 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moos, R. H., Insel, P. M., & Humphrey, B. (1974). Preliminary manual for family environment scale, work environment scale, group environment scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1981). Family Environmental Scale manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1984). Family Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, M., Foch, T. T., Sherry, T., & Plomin, R. (1980). A twin study of specific behavior problems of socialization as viewed by parents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plomin, R. (1994). Genetics and experience. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1991). The nature of nurture: Genetic influences on “environmental” measures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 373–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from each other? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (1985). Origins of individual differences in infancy: The Colorado Adoption Project. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Nature and nurture during infancy and early childhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., Loehlin, J. C., & DeFries, J. C. (1985). Genetic and environmental components of “environmental” influences. Developmental Psychology, 21, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1988). Genetic influence on childhood family environment perceived retrospectively from the last half of the life span. Developmental Psychology, 24, 738–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., Rende, R., & Rutter, M. (1991). Quantitative genetics and developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. & Toth, S. L. (Eds.), Internalizing and externalizing expressions of dysfunction: Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology (Vol. 2, pp. 155–202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reid, W. J., & Crisafulli, A. (1990). Marital discord and child behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodgers, J. L., Rowe, D. C., & Li, C. (1994). Beyond nature versus nurture: DF analysis of nonshared influences on problem behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 30, 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, D. C. (1981). Environmental and genetic influences on dimensions of perceived parenting: A twin study. Developmental Psychology, 17, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, D. C. (1983). A biometrical analysis of perceptions of family environment: A study of twin and singleton sibling kinships. Child Development, 54, 424–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, D. C., & Waldman, I. D. (1993). The question of “how?” reconsidered. In Plomin, R. & McClearn, G. E. (Eds.), Nature, nurture & psychology (pp. 355–373). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M. (1985a). Family and school influences: meanings, mechanisms and implications. In Nicol, A. R. (Ed.), Longitudinal studies in child psychology and psychiatry: practical lessons from research experience (pp. 357–403). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1985b). Family and social influences on behavioural development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searight, H. R., Searight, P. R., & Scott, E. (1987). Family environments of children with school behavior problems. Psychological Reports, 60, 1263–1266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotypeenvironment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.Google ScholarPubMed
Sines, J. O. (1987). Influence of the home and family environment on childhood dysfunction. In Lahey, B. B. & Kazdin, A. E. (Eds.), Advances in Clinical Child Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 1–54). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Wachs, T. D. (1992). The nature of nurture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachs, T. D. (1983). The use and abuse of environment in behavior-genetic research. Child Development, 54, 396–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed