Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:11:53.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gene–environment interactions reexamined: Does mother's marital stability interact with the dopamine receptor D2 gene in the etiology of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2007

Irwin D. Waldman
Irwin D. Waldman*
Affiliation:
Emory University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Irwin D. Waldman, Department of Psychology, Emory University, 532 North Kilgo Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Potential candidate Gene × Environment interactions in the etiology of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are examined between the dopamine receptor D2 gene (DRD2) and putative family environmental risk factors that reflect mothers' marital stability. Specifically, interactions were tested between DRD2 and mothers' marital status, number of marriages or cohabiting relationships, and age at first marriage. Moderate relations were found among the marital stability measures, and mother's marital status and number of marriages or cohabiting relationships (but not age at first marriage) were risk factors for their children's ADHD. All three mother's marital stability variables were associated with either the child's or mother's DRD2 genotypes. Gene × Environment interactions were found for children's ADHD diagnoses between children's DRD2 genotypes and mother's marital status and number of marriages or cohabiting relationships. It is of interest that these interactions were strengthened with the progressive addition of sets of covariates intended to control for alternative causal pathways that represent background genetic and environmental context confounds. The present findings highlight the importance of considering both the nexus of putative environmental risk factors and whether their etiology and effects are truly environmental in future Gene × Environment interaction research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Fall 2007 , pp. 1117 - 1128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, P. R. (2001). Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 355–370.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Barr, C. L., & Kidd, K. K. (1993). Population frequencies of the A1 allele at the dopamine D2 receptor locus. Biological Psychiatry, 34, 204–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookes, K.-J., Mill, J., Guindalini, C., Curran, S., Xu, X., Knight, J., et al. (2006). A common haplotype of the dopamine transporter gene associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and interacting with maternal use of alcohol during pregnancy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 74–81.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–854.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Cannon, M., McClay, J., Murray, R., Harrington, H., et al. (2005). Moderation of the effect of adolescent-onset cannabis use on adult psychosis by a functional polymorphism in the COMT gene: Longitudinal evidence of a gene–environment interaction. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1117–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington, H., et al. (2003). Influence of life stress on depression: Moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301, 386–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 597–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1999). Conceptual and methodological issues in developmental psychopathology research. In Kendall, P. C., Butcher, J. N., & Holmbeck, G. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 433–465). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Comings, D. E., Comings, B. G., Muhleman, D., Deitz, G., Shahbahrami, B., Tast, D., et al. (1991). The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) locus as a modifying gene in neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 1793–1800.Google Scholar
D'Onofrio, B. M., Turkheimer, E. N., Emery, R. E., Slutske, W., Heath, A., Madden, P. A. F., et al. (2005). A genetically informed study of marital instability and its association with offspring psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 570–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J., Deater-Deckard, K., Pickering, K., O'Connor, T. G., Goodman, R., & Golding, J. (1998). Children's adjustment and prosocial behavior in step-, single-parent, and nonstep family settings: Findings from a community study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 1083–1095.Google Scholar
Eaves, L. (2006). Genotype × Environment interaction in psychopathology: Fact or artifact. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 1–8.Google Scholar
Eley, T. C., Sugden, K., Corsico, A., Gregory, A. M., Sham, P., McGuffin, P., et al. (2004). Gene–environment interaction analysis of serotonin system markers with adolescent depression. Molecular Psychiatry, 9, 915–922.Google Scholar
Foley, D. L., Eaves, L. J., Wormley, B., Silberg, J. L., Maes, H. H., Kuhn, J., et al. (2004). Childhood adversity, monoamine oxidase A genotype, and risk for conduct disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 738–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, N. A., Whitfield, J. B., Williams, B., Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. (2005). The relationship between stressful life events, the serotonin transporter (5-HHTLPR) genotype, and major depression. Psychological Medicine, 35, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberstick, B. C., Lessem, M., Hopfer, C. J., Smolen, A., Ehringer, M. A., Timberlake, D., et al. (2005). Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) and antisocial behaviors in the presence of childhood and adolescent maltreatment. American Journal of Medical Genetics: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 135B, 59–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. G. (1994). Genetic influences on alcohol consumption patterns and problem drinking: Results from the Australian NH&MRC twin panel follow-up survey. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 708, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffee, S. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Taylor, A. (2004). Physical maltreatment victim to antisocial child: Evidence of an environmentally mediated process. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 44–55.Google Scholar
Jockin, V., McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1996) Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 288–299.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F., Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2004). Marriage and personality: A genetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 285–294.Google Scholar
Kahn, R., Khoury, J., Nichols, W. C., & Lanphear, B. (2003). Role of dopamine transporter genotype and maternal prenatal smoking in childhood hyperactive–impulsive, inattentive, and oppositional behaviors. Journal of Pediatrics, 143, 104–110.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. B., & Emery, R. E. (2003). Children's adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives. Family Relations, 52, 352–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Karkowski, L. M., & Prescott, C. A. (1999). The assessment of dependence in the study of stressful life events: Validation using a twin design. Psychological Medicine, 29, 1455–1460.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Kuhn, J. W., Vittum, J., Prescott, C. A., & Riley, B. (2005). Stressful life events, genetic liability and onset of an episode of major depression in women. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1133–1145.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. & Prescott, C. A. (1998). Cannabis use, abuse, and dependence in a population-based sample of female twins. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1016–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Williams, B., Newcombe, R., Craig, I. W., et al. (2006). MAOA, maltreatment, and gene–environment interaction predicting children's mental health: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 903–913.Google Scholar
Lange, C., & Laird, N. M. (2002). On a general class of conditional tests for family-based association studies in genetics: The asymptotic distribution, the conditional power, and optimality considerations. Genetic Epidemiology, 23, 1–16.Google Scholar
Magnus, P., Berg, K., Bjerkedal, T., & Nance, W. E. (1985). The heritability of smoking behaviour in pregnancy, and the birth weights of offspring of smoking-discordant twins. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 13, 29–34.Google Scholar
McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1992). Genetic influence on risk of divorce. Psychological Science, 6, 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Rutter, M. (2005). Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 473–481.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T., Caspi, A., & Rutter, M. (2006). Measured gene–environment interactions in psychopathology: Concepts, research strategies, and implications for research, intervention, and public understanding of genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsson, K. W., Sjöberg, R. L., Damberg, M., Leppert, J., Öhrvik, J., Alm, P. O., et al. (2005). Role of monoamine oxidase A genotype and psychosocial factors in male adolescent criminal activity. Biological Psychiatry, 59, 121–127.Google Scholar
Noble, E. P., Blum, K., Ritchie, T., Montgomery, A., & Sheridan, P. J. (1991). Allelic association of the D2 dopamine receptor gene in alcoholism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 648–654.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Lichtenstein, P., Pedersen, N. L., McClearn, G. E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1990). Genetic influence on life events during the last half of the life span. Psychological Aging, 5, 25–30.Google Scholar
Ram, B., & Hou, F. (2003). Changes in family structure and child outcomes: Roles of economic and familial resources. The Policy Studies Journal, 31, 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, N., Burchard, E., Ziv, E., & Tang, H. (2002). Categorization of humans in biomedical research: Genes, race and disease. Genome Biology, 3, 1–12.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. C., Van den Oord, E. J. C. G., Stever, C., Giedinghagen, L. N., Gard, J. M. C., Cleveland, H. H., et al. (1999). The DRD2 TaqI–A2 allele and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Molecular Psychiatry, 4, 580–586.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Moffitt, T., & Caspi, A. (2006). Gene–environment interplay and psychopathology: Multiple varieties but real effects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 226–261.Google Scholar
Self, S. G., & Liang, K.-Y. (1987). Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 605–610.Google Scholar
Shanahan, M. J., & Hofer, S. M. (2005). Social context in gene–environment interactions: Retrospect and prospect. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60B, 65–76.Google Scholar
Spielman, R. S., McGinnis, R. E., & Ewens, W. J. (1993). Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: The insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). American Journal of Human Genetics, 52, 506–516.Google Scholar
Stroschein, L. (2005). Parental divorce and child mental health trajectories. Journal of Marriage and Family. 67, 1286–1300.Google Scholar
Tang, H., Quertermous, T., Rodriguez, B., Kardia, S. L. R., Zhu, X., Brown, A., et al. (2005). Genetic structure, self-identified race/ethnicity, and confounding in case–control association studies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 76, 268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A., & Kim-Cohen, J. (2007). Meta-analysis of gene–environment interactions in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 1029–1037.Google Scholar
Thapar, A., Langley, K., Fowler, T., Rice, F., Turic, D., Whittinger, N., et al. (2005). Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene variant and birth weight predict early-onset antisocial behavior in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 1275–1278.Google Scholar
Waldman, I. D., Robinson, B. F., & Rowe, D. C. (1999). A logistic regression based extension of the TDT for continuous and categorical traits. Annals of Human Genetics, 63, 329–340.Google Scholar
Waldman, I. D., Rowe, D. C., Abramowitz, A., Kozel, S. T., Mohr, J. H., Sherman, S. L., et al. (1998). Association and linkage of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. American Journal of Human Genetics, 63, 1767–1776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, S. E., Smolen, A., Hewitt, J. K., Haberstick, B. C., Stallings, M. C., Corley, R. P., et al. (2006). Interaction between MAO-A genotype and maltreatment in the risk for conduct disorder: Failure to confirm in adolescent patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1019–1025.Google Scholar