Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:55:13.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early unpredictability predicts increased adolescent externalizing behaviors and substance use: A life history perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2015

Jenalee R. Doom ,
Adrienne A. Vanzomeren-Dohm  and
Jeffry A. Simpson
Jenalee R. Doom*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Institute of Child Development
Adrienne A. Vanzomeren-Dohm
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Institute of Child Development
Jeffry A. Simpson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Institute of Child Development
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jenalee R. Doom, 51 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to evolutionary life history models, environmental harshness and unpredictability can both promote a fast life history strategy characterized by increased risk taking and enacting short-term, opportunistic behaviors. The current longitudinal study tests whether environmental unpredictability during childhood has stronger effects on risky behavior during adolescence than harshness, and whether there may be an early “sensitive period” during which unpredictability has particularly strong and unique effects on these outcomes. Using data from the Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation, prospective assessments of environmental unpredictability (changes in residence, cohabitation, and parental occupation) and harshness (mean socioeconomic status) from birth into adolescence were used to predict self-reported externalizing behaviors and substance use at age 16 (N = 220). Exposure to greater early unpredictability (between ages 0 and 5) predicted more externalizing behaviors as well as more alcohol and marijuana use at age 16, controlling for harshness and later unpredictability (between ages 6 and 16). Harshness predicted adolescent substance use, and later unpredictability predicted adolescent externalizing behaviors at the trend level. Early unpredictability and harshness also interacted, such that the highest levels of risk taking occurred in individuals who experienced more early unpredictability and lived in harsher environments. Age 16 externalizing behaviors, but not substance use, mediated the association between early unpredictability and externalizing/criminal behaviors at age 23. We discuss how exposure to early environmental unpredictability may alter biological and social–cognitive functioning from a life history perspective.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 28 , Special Issue 4pt2: Epigenetics: Development, Psychopathology, Resilience, and Preventive Intervention , November 2016 , pp. 1505 - 1516
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M. (1997). Manual for the Young Adult Self-Report and Young Adult Behavior Checklist. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B., Kogos, J., Youngstrom, E., Schoff, K., & Izard, C. (1999). Family instability and the problem behaviors of children from economically disadvantaged families. Developmental Psychology, 35, 258–268.Google Scholar
Bada, H. S. (2008). Importance of stability of early living arrangements on behavior outcomes of children with and without prenatal drug exposure. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 29, 173–182.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Schlomer, G. L., & Ellis, B. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48, 662–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., Houts, R. M., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2010). The development of reproductive strategy in females: Early maternal harshness → early menarche → increased sexual risk taking. Developmental Psychology, 46, 120–128.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Vandell, D., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., McCartney, K., & Owen, M. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78, 681–701.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.Google Scholar
Bereczkei, T., & Csanaky, A. (1996). Evolutionary pathways of child development: Lifestyles of adolescents and adults from father-absent families. Human Nature, 7, 257–280.Google Scholar
Block, J., Block, J. H., & Keyes, S. (1988). Longitudinally foretelling drug usage in adolescence: Early childhood personality and environmental precursors. Child Development, 59, 336–355.Google Scholar
Blum, R. W., Resnick, M. D., & Bergeisen, L. G. (1989). The state of adolescent health in Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Adolescent Health Program.Google Scholar
Boyer, T. W. (2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26, 291–345.Google Scholar
Braun, K. (2011). The prefrontal-limbic system: Development, neuroanatomy, function, and implications for socioemotional development. Clinics in Perinatology, 38, 685–702.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dawson, G., Ashman, S., & Carver, L. (2000). The role of early experience in shaping behavioral and brain development and its implications for social policy. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 695–712.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In Reiss, A. J. Jr. (Ed.), Occupations and social status. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Egeland, B., Breitenbucher, M., & Rosenberg, D. (1980). Prospective study of the significance of life stress in the etiology of child abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 195–205.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Fergusson, D., Horwood, J., Pettit, G. S., et al. (2003). Does early father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy? Child Development, 74, 801–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2012). Beyond mental health: An evolutionary analysis of development under risky and supportive environmental conditions: An introduction to the Special Section. Developmental Psychology, 48, 591–597.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., & Del Giudice, M. (2014). Beyond allostatic load: Rethinking the role of stress in regulating human development. Developmental and Psychopathology, 26, 1–20.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., et al. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48, 598–623.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268.Google Scholar
Evans, G. W., & English, K. (2002). The environment of poverty: Multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Development, 73, 1238–1248.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1989). Early predictors of adolescent aggression and adult violence. Violence and Victims, 4, 79–100.Google Scholar
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14, 245–258.Google Scholar
Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 381–390.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., et al. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243–275.Google Scholar
Frankenhuis, W. E., & Karremans, J. C. (2012). Uncommitted men match their risk taking to female preferences, while committed men do the opposite. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 428–431.Google Scholar
Gibbons, F. X., Roberts, M. E., Gerrard, M., Li, Z., Beach, S. R., Simons, R. L., et al. (2012). The impact of stress on the life history strategies of African American adolescents: Cognitions, genetic moderation, and the role of discrimination. Developmental Psychology, 48, 722–739.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1015–1026.Google Scholar
Guerri, C., & Pascual, M. (2010). Mechanisms involved in the neurotoxic, cognitive, and neurobehavioral effects of alcohol consumption during adolescence. Alcohol, 44, 15–26.Google Scholar
Gutman, L. M., Sameroff, A. S., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The academic achievement of African American students during early adolescence: An examination of risk, promotive, and protective factors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 376–399.Google Scholar
Hanson, M. D., & Chen, E. (2007). Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: A review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 263–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.Google Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (2007). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. In Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Rodkin, P. (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 1–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hill, E., Ross, M. L. T., & Low, B. S. (1997). The role of future unpredictability in human risk-taking. Human Nature, 8, 287–325.Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H. S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68–95). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kliewer, W., & Kung, E. (1998). Family moderators of the relation between hassles and behavior problems in inner city youth. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 278–292.Google Scholar
Koblinsky, S. A., Morgan, K. M., & Anderson, E. A. (1997). African-American homeless and low-income housed mothers: Comparison of parenting practices. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67, 37–47.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum and Taylor Francis Group.Google Scholar
McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840, 33–44.Google Scholar
Miczek, K. A., Nikulina, E. M., Shimamoto, A., & Covington, H. E. (2011). Escalated or suppressed cocaine reward, tegmental BDNF, and accumbal dopamine caused by episodic versus continuous social stress in rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9848–9857.Google Scholar
Mittal, C., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Sense of control under uncertainty depends on people's childhood environment: A life history approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 621–637.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.Google Scholar
Monti, P. M., Miranda, R. Jr, Nixon, K., Sher, K. J., Swartzwelder, H. S., Tapert, S. F., et al. (2005). Adolescence: Booze, brains, and behavior. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 207–220.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2010). Dying young and living fast: Variation in life history across English neighborhoods. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 387–395.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 47, 142–163.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.Google Scholar
Quinlan, R. J. (2003). Father absence, parental care and female reproductive development. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 376–390.Google Scholar
Quinlan, R. J. (2007). Human parental effort and environmental risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 121–125.Google Scholar
Repetti, R. L., Taylor, S. E., & Seeman, T. E. (2002). Risky families, family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 330–366.Google Scholar
Rodkin, P., Farmer, T., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2006). They're cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15, 175–204.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, L. A., & Andrews, M. W. (1994). Influences of environmental demand on maternal behavior and infant development. Acta Pediatica, 397, 57–63.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, L. A., & Paully, G. S., (1984). The effects of varying environmental demands on maternal and infant behavior. Child Development, 55, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, E. A., Aseltine, R. H., & Gore, S. (2007). Adverse childhood experiences and mental health in young adults: A longitudinal survey. BMC Public Health, 7, 30.Google Scholar
Shonkoff, J. P., Boyce, W. T., & McEwen, B. S. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 2252–2259.Google Scholar
Shonkoff, J. P., & Garner, A. S. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129, e232–e246.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2008). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 131–157). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2016). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., Kuo, S. I.-C., Sung, S., & Collins, W. A. (2012). Evolution, stress, and sensitive periods: The influence of unpredictability in early versus late childhood on sex and risky behavior. Developmental Psychology, 48, 674–686.Google Scholar
Sroufe, A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E., & Collins, W. (2005). Placing early attachment experiences in developmental context: The Minnesota Longitudinal Study. In Grossman, K., Grossmann, K., & Waters, E. (Eds.), Attachment from infancy to adulthood (pp. 48–70). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. (1992). The evolution of life histories. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, G., & Featherman, D. L. (1981). A revised socioeconomic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 10, 365–395.Google Scholar
Susman, E. J. (2006). Psychobiology of persistent antisocial behavior: Stress, early vulnerabilities and the attenuation hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 376–389.Google Scholar
Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Smith, C. A., & Porter, P. K. (2003). Causes and consequences of delinquency: Findings from the Rochester Youth Development Study. In Thornberry, T. P. & Krohn, M. D. (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies (pp. 11–46). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wills, T. A., Vaccaro, D., & McNamara, G. (1994). Novelty seeking, risk taking, and related constructs as predictors of adolescent substance use: An application of Cloninger's theory. Journal of Substance Abuse, 6, 1–20.Google Scholar