Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T14:03:45.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arrested development: The effects of incarceration on the development of psychosocial maturity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2012

Julia Dmitrieva ,
Kathryn C. Monahan ,
Elizabeth Cauffman  and
Laurence Steinberg
Julia Dmitrieva*
Affiliation:
University of Denver
Kathryn C. Monahan
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Elizabeth Cauffman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Laurence Steinberg
Affiliation:
Temple University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Julia Dmitrieva, Department of Psychology, Frontier Hall, 2155 South Race Street, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Improvements in temperance, perspective, and responsibility are a part of typical development of psychosocial maturity during adolescence. The existing literature suggests that the developmental course of psychosocial maturity is influenced by normative variations in social context, but little is known about how atypical contexts, such as incarceration, influence its development. The study investigates how the development of psychosocial maturity is affected by incarceration, using data from a 7-year longitudinal study of 1,171 adolescent males. We compared the effects of confinement in juvenile facilities with varying degrees of focus on incarceration versus rehabilitation (i.e., secure vs. residential treatment facilities) and tested whether facility quality and age at incarceration moderate the effect of incarceration on psychosocial maturity. The results indicate that incarceration in a secure setting, but not a residential treatment facility, is associated with a short-term decline in temperance and responsibility. The total amount of time incarcerated in a residential treatment facility, but not a secure setting, had a negative effect on the developmental trajectory of psychosocial maturity. Age at incarceration, but not the facility quality, moderated the effect of recent incarceration: older youths were more susceptible to short-term negative effects of recent incarceration in a secure setting, but they also benefited more than younger participants from short-term positive effects of incarceration in a residential treatment setting. Furthermore, youths who perceived their incarceration setting as unsafe evinced a decline in temperance. Future research and policy implications are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Multilevel Approaches Toward Understanding Antisocial Behavior: Current Research and Future Directions , August 2012 , pp. 1073 - 1090
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory, 6, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, M., Skeem, J., Solekin, R., & Van Rybroek, G. (2006). Treatment response of adolescent offenders with psychopathy features—A 2-year follow-up. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 571–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspi, A., & Amell, J. (1994). The reliability of life history calendar data (DPPP Tech. Report 94–01). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Cauffman, E., & Woolard, J. (1999). The Future Outlook Inventory. Unpublished manuscript, MacArthur Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar
Chung, H., Little, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). The transition to adulthood for adolescents in the juvenile justice system: A developmental perspective. In Osgood, W., Foster, M., Flanagan, C. & Ruth, G. (Eds.), On your own without a net: The transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations (pp. 68–91). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, D., Thornton, A., Camburn, D., Alwin, D., & Young-Demarco, L. (1988). The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology, 18, 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberger, E., Josselson, R., Knerr, C., & Knerr, B. (1975). The measurement and structure of psychosocial maturity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 4, 127–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helsen, M., Vollebergh, W., & Meeus, W. (2000). Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, J., & Owen, B. (2005). Harm and the contemporary prison. In Liebling, A. & Maruna, S. (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 94–117). London: Willan.Google Scholar
Kummerlowe, C. (1995). Coping with imprisonment: A long-termer's view. In Flanagan, T. (Ed.), Long-term imprisonment: Policy science and correctional practice (pp. 41–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, T. A., Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., Fagan, J., Piquero, A. R., & Losoya, S. H. (2009). Estimating a dose–response relationship between length of stay and future recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 47, 699–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. (2009). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology 45, 1654–1668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. (2011). Psychosocial (im)maturity from adolescence to early adulthood: Distinguishing between adolescence-limited and persistent antisocial behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., & Chung, H. L. (2007). Service use after court involvement in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Child and Youth Services Review, 29, 518–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., & Odgers, C. A. (2010). A method for measuring organizational functioning in juvenile justice facilities using resident ratings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1255–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Council on Crime and Delinquency. (2007). And justice for some: Differential treatment of youth of color in the justice system. Oakland, CA: Author.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. M., & McCubbin, H. I. (1987). Adolescent coping style and behaviors—Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescence, 10, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosner, L. (1990). Documenting the destruction of a successful juvenile rehabilitation program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 16, 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectations. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Losoya, S. H., Hecker, T., et al. (2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 237–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, E., & Steinberg, L. (2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shulman, E., & Cauffman, E. (in press). Coping with incarceration: How do juvenile offenders adjust? Journal of Research on Adolescence.Google Scholar
Sickmund, M., Sladky, T. J., Kang, W., & Puzzanchera, C. (2008). Easy access to the census of juveniles in residential placement. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved August 6, 2011, from http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/Google Scholar
Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, L., Chung, H. L., & Little, M. (2004). Reentry of young offenders from the justice system: A developmental perspective. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teen Boot Camps. (2011). What problems do boot camps fix? Retrieved August 18, 2011, from http://www.teenbootcamps.com/index/boot+camps/FAQGoogle Scholar
Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Dulcan, M. K., & Mericle, A. A. (2002). Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 1133–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Weinberger, D. A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: A typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58, 381–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimbardo, P. G. (1990). The Stanford Time Perspective Inventory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar