Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T12:28:39.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential of Movement Analysis as a Research Tool: A Preliminary Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Irmgard Bartenieff ,
Peggy Hackney ,
Betty True Jones ,
Judy Van Zile  and
Carl Wolz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Scholarly studies explore dance from many points of view. They may focus on the historical development of a dance form, examine the context in which a particular dance event occurs, explore the background of those who dance and how this relates to social structure, or explore the movement process itself—the dancing. While all approaches to the study of dance provide potentially meaningful data and insights relating to the role of dance in its socio-cultural context, the heart of dance is the movement. Dance research that ignores the dancing (except for very broad descriptive statements) ignores a major component that has potential for revealing a great deal about those who create and use dance.

American researchers who have explored the movement process have, on the whole, worked independently (of each other or of other research projects), without working toward developing a widely understood methodology for examining dance movement and exploring its potential uses in other dance research. While such studies contribute to the knowledge of specific dances or dance forms, they overlook the need for common tools necessary for cross-cultural and comparative studies. To allow for the most meaningful research to be carried out, a discipline must develop tools and methodologies that have a certain consensus of validity and broad applicability. Only through use of such research procedures will it be possible to interrelate apparently diverse studies and evolve broad concepts relating to dance as human activity.

Type
Movement Analysis
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , Spring 1984 , pp. 3 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1984

References

REFERENCES CITED

Aiyar, S. Paramesvara, ed. 1925 Vyavahāramāla. Trivandrum: Government Press, No. IX of the Śrī Mūlam Malayālam Series.Google Scholar
Bartenieff, Irmgard 1980 Body Movement: Coping with the Environment. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Dell, Cecily 1970 A Primer for Movement Description Using Effort-Shape and Supplementary Concepts. New York: Dance Notation Bureau.Google Scholar
Gellerman, Jill 1978 “The Mayim Pattern as an Indicator of Cultural Attitudes in Three American Hasidic Communities; A Comparative Approach Based on Labananalysis.” CORD Dance Research Annual IX: 111–144.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Manomohan, ed. and tr. 1957 Nandikeśvara's Abhinayadarpaṃam. Calcutta: Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Ann 1977 Labanotation or Kinetography Laban: The System of Analyzing and Recording Movement. Third edition, revised from original 1954 publication. New York: Theatre Arts Books.Google Scholar
Ingalls, Daniel H.H.,tr. 1965 An Anthology of Sanskrit Court Poetry: Vidyṃkara's “Subhāṣitaratnakośa.” Harvard Oriental Series Vol. 44. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Betty True 1973 “Mōhiniyāṭṭam: A Dance tradition of Kerala, South India.” CORD Dance Research Monograph 1 (1971–1972): 9–47.Google Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne L. 1972 “Method and Theory in Analyzing Dance Structure with an Analysis of Tongan Dance.” Ethnomusicology 16 (2): 173–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kürti, Laszlo 1980 “Hungarian Dance Structures: A Linguistic Approach.” Journal for the Anthropological Study of Human Movement I(1):45–62.Google Scholar
Monier-Williams, , SirMonier, 1899 A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press (reprinted 1959, 1960): 824–5.Google Scholar
Ohio State University, Dance Notation Bureau Extension 1976 A Summary Report of the 1976 Labananalysis Workshop. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Panikkar, T.K. Gopal n.d. Malabar and Its Folk. 2nd edition. Madras: G.A. Natesan and Co.Google Scholar
Pelto, Pertti J. and Gretel, H. 1970 Anthropological Research: The Structure of Inquiry. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pforsich, Janis 1978 “Labananalysis and Dance Style Research: An Historical Survey and Report of the 1976 Ohio State University Research Workshop.” CORD Dance Research Annual IX: 59–74.Google Scholar
Sanyal, J.M., tr. n.d. The Srimad-Bhagabatam of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa. 2nd edition, Vol. III. Calcutta: Oriental Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Seegar, Charles 1958 “Prescriptive and Descriptive Music Writing.” Musical Quarterly, 44:2(April), pp. 283–303.Google Scholar
Van Zile, Judy 1983 “Balasaraswati's Tisram Alarippu: A Choreographic Analysis.” In Wade, Bonnie C., ed., Performing Arts in India. Essays on Music, Dance, and Drama. Monograph Series No. 21 (Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California, Berkeley). Maryland: University Press of America, pp. 45–102.Google Scholar