Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T14:03:29.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personal Style as a Mediator of Engagement in Dance: Watching Terpsichore Rise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Karen Bond
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a world where symbolic discourse may be the hallmark of a dominant species, certain human beings stand out for their social isolation. Six nonverbal children, ages six to nine, with dual impairments of vision and hearing, formed one such cluster of humanity within a residential educational setting. This article reports on some features of a study that analyzes the influence of an intensive dance program (Dance) on social and task engagement in these children (Bond 1991). A multi-faceted inquiry was undertaken that combined a two-group experimental design with participant observation and cumulative theorizing. In this “art-science duet” (Bond 1987), qualitative procedures were adopted to interpret patterns of engagement uncovered through quantitative analysis. Results clearly show that Dance was an effective mode of expression, communication and learning for the six children.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Spring 1994 , pp. 15 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Consulted

Alter, J. 1991. Dance-based dance theory. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bartenieff, I. 1967. Research in anthropology: A study of dance styles in primitive cultures. Research in dance: Problems and possibilities. New York: CORD Publications.Google Scholar
Bartenieff, I. and Davis, M.. 1972. Effort-shape analysis of movement. Research approaches to movement and personality. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Bartenieff, I. with Lewis, S.. 1980. Body movement: Coping with the environment. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Bartenieff, I., Hackney, P., Jones, B. T., Van Zile, J., and Wolz, C.. 1984. The potential of movement analysis as a research tool: A preliminary analysis. Dance Research Journal 16(1): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrol, C. 1984. The effects of two movement therapy approaches on selected academic, physical and socio-behavioral measures of first grade children with learning and perceptualmotor problems. American Journal of Dance Therapy 7:32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, D. and Peat, F. D.. 1987. Science, order and creativity. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Bond, K. 1987. Dance research: An art-science duet. Paper delivered at the First Australian Dance Therapy Conference/Workshops. Melbourne College of Advanced Education, July.Google Scholar
Bond, K. 1991. Dance for children with dual sensory impairments. Ph.D. thesis, La Trobe University, Bundoora, 1991.Google Scholar
Bond, K. 1992. Why humans dance: A bio-cultural perspective. Paper delievered at the Sixth Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Human Biology. Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Canner, N. 1968. And a time to dance. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Canner, N. 1980. Movement therapy with multi-handicapped children. In Movement and growth: Dance therapy for the special child., ed. Leventhal, M.. New York: New York University Center for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Cobb, E. 1977. The ecology of imagination in childhood. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, R. and Cohen, M.. 1983. What is dance? Readings in theory and criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. 1970. Movement characteristics of hospitalized psychiatric patients. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the American Dance Therapy Association 25-45.Google Scholar
Davis, M. 1983. An introduction to the Davis Nonverbal Communication Analysis System (DaNCAS). American Journal of Dance Therapy 6: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillard, A. 1974. Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. 1992. Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1988. The biological foundations of aesthetics. In Beauty and the brain: Biological aspects of aesthetics., eds. Rentschler, I., Herzberger, B. and Epstein, D.. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. 1985. Aesthetic modes of knowing. In Learning and teaching the ways of knowing, Part 2, ed. Eisner, E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fraleigh, S. 1987. Dance and the lived body. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Francis, S. 1991. The origins of dance: The perspective of primate evolution. Dance Chronicle 14: 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, R. 1982. Beginnings in ritual studies. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hanna, J. 1979. To dance is human: A theory of nonverbal communication. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, J. 1988. Dance and stress: Resistance, reduction, and euphoria. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Hanstein, P. 1989. On speaking to the audience without words: Is dance a language? In Dance: Current selected research, eds. Overby, L. and Humphrey, J.. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Hast, D. 1993. Performance, transformation and community: Contra dance in New England. Dance Research Journal 17(1):21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 1984. Cultural attitudes in psychological perspective. Toronto: Inner City Books.Google Scholar
Kealiinohomoku, J. 1976. Theory and methods for an anthropological study of dance. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Kestenberg, J. 1976. The role of movement patterns in development. Vol. 1. New York: Dance Notation Bureau.Google Scholar
Kestenberg, J. and Sossin, M.. 1979. The role of movement patterns in development. Vol. 2. New York: Dance Notation Bureau.Google Scholar
Laban, R. 1960. Mastery of movement. London: Macdonald and Evans.Google Scholar
Laban, R. 1974. The language of movement. Boston: Plays, Inc.Google Scholar
Lamb, W. and Watson, E.. 1979. Body code: The meaning in movement. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Leventhal, M. 1973. Research in movement therapy. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the American Dance Therapy Association 126–141.Google Scholar
Leventhal, M. 1979. Structure in dance therapy: A model for personality integration. Dance Research Annual 10: 173–182.Google Scholar
Leventhal, M. 1980. Dance therapy as treatment of choice for the emotionally disturbed and learning disabled child. Journal of Physical Education and Recreation (September): 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomax, A. 1968. Folksong style and culture. Washington, D. C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, Publ. No. 88.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1987. Ecology of the body: Styles of behavior in human life. Durham: Duke University.Google Scholar
Maletic, V. 1982. On the aisthetic and aesthetic dimensions of the dance: A methodology for researching dance style. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
Maquet, J. 1986. The aesthetic experience. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, M. and Huberman, M.. 1984. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Moore, C. and Yamamoto, K.. 1988. Beyond Words: Movement Observation and Analysis. NY: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Moroney, M. 1953. Facts from figures. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
North, M. 1975. Personality assessment through movement. Boston: Plays, Inc.Google Scholar
Pforsich, J. 1978. Labananalysis and dance style research: An historical survey and report of the 1976 Ohio State University research workshop. Dance Research Annual 9: 59–74.Google Scholar
Puretz, S. 1989. The psychology of dance: A research review. In Dance: Current selected research, eds. Overby, L. and Humphrey, J.. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Sparshott, F. 1988. Off the ground: First steps to a philosophical consideration of dance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stamatelos, T. 1984. Peaks and plateaus of the mentally retarded. The Arts in Psychotherapy 11: 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillman, R. and Battle, C.. 1986. Developmental assessment of communicative abilities in the deaf-blind. In Sensory impairments in mentally handicapped people, ed. Ellis, D.. Beckenham: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Stinson, S. 1985. Piaget for dance educators: Atheoretical study. Dance Research Journal 17(1): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, V. 1969. The ritual process: Structure and antistructure. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1982. From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.Google Scholar
Youngerman, S. 1984. Movement notation systems as conceptual frameworks: The Laban system. In Illuminating dance: Philosophical explorations, ed. Sheets-Johnstone, M.. London: Associated Press.Google Scholar