Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:57:19.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participatory and Presentational Dance as Ethnochoreological Categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Andriy Nahachewsky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Typologies are tools to help us understand the range of observed phenomena. Many typological categories are useful in dance research, contrasting various features in the data. Based on the identity of the recipient of the danced message, four types of dance can be identified: reflexive, participatory, sacred, and presentational. The conceptual axis between participatory and presentational dance is proposed as potentially significant for ethnochoreologists. Differences in the intended recipient of the communicated message affect the other components of the dance event, including the movement “text.”

At least in our example of two Ukrainian dances, participatory dances carry their communicative message over short distances, and utilize microscopic movement elements for this purpose. The message in presentational dances must be carried over a greater span, and macroscopic movement units tend to carry this communicative value. In both types of dance, the movement content is most complex at the structural levels which are most used in communication. Conversely, participatory dances are often simple on the macroscopic level, while presentational dances tend to have uncomplicated microscopic content.

The participatory-presentational axis can clarify important differences in activities often lumped together under the problematic category of “folk” dance. These conceptual categories may be of use for anyone studying dance in its cultural context.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Colleen. “A Study of Selected Ukrainian Staged Folk Dances.” M.A. thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 1985.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Lucile. A Window on Folk Dance. Huddersfield, England: Springfield, 1985.Google Scholar
Avramenko, Vasile. Ukrains'ki natsiona'ni tanky muzyka i strii [Ukrainian national dances, music and costume]. Winnipeg: Author, 1947.Google Scholar
Blacking, John. How Musical is Man? Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Booth, Gregory D. and Kuhn, Terry Lee. “Economic and Transmission Factors as Essential Elements in the Definition of Folk, Art, and Pop Music,” The Musical Quarterly 74–3, (1990): 411–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchenal, Elizabeth. Folk-Dances from Old Homelands. Folk-Dances and Singing Games, vol. 3. New York: G. Schirmer, 1922.Google Scholar
Crum, Richard. “The Ukrainian Dance in North America” in Ukrainian Folk Dance: A Symposium, ed. Robert B., Klymasz, 5–14. Toronto: Ukrainian National Youth Federation of Canada, 1961.Google Scholar
Duggan, Anne Schley, Jeanette, Schlottmann, and Rutledge, Addie. The Teaching of Folk Dance. The Folk Dance Library. New York: A.S. Barnes, 1948.Google Scholar
Dunin, Elsie Ivancich. “Dance Events as a Means to Social Interchange” in The Dance Event: A Complex Cultural Phenomenon, ed. Torp, Lisbet, 30–33. Copenhagen: ICTM Study Group on Ethnochoreology, 1989.Google Scholar
Dúžek, Stanislav. “Tanečný folklór a problematika jeho scénického spracovania” [Dance folklore and the problem of its arrangement for the stage] in Folklór a scéna. Zborník príspevkov k problematike štylizácie folklóru [Folklore and the stage: Collection of articles on the problem of stylization of folklore], eds. Milan, Leščák and švehlák, Svetozár, 53–56. Bratislava1: Osvetový ústav, 1973.Google Scholar
Giurchescu, Anca. “La danse comme objet sémiotique” [Dance as a semiotic object]. Yearbook of the International Folk Music Council 5 (1973): 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Moses. Children's Theatre: A Philosophy and a Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice–Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
Gourdon, A.M. “Participation” in Dictionaire Encyclopédique du Theatre, ed. Juilliard, Olivier, 629–630. Paris: Bordas, 1991.Google Scholar
Hanna, Judith Lynne. To Dance is Human: A Theory of Nonverbal Communication. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1979. Second edition, 1987.Google Scholar
Hanna, Judith Lynne. “Toward Semantic Analysis of Movement Behavior: Concepts and Problems.” Semiotica 25–1/2 (1979a): 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerburger, Felix. “Folk Dance Survey.” International Folk Music Journal 17 (1965): 7–8.Google Scholar
Hoerburger, Felix. “Once Again: On the Concept of ‘Folk Dance.’” Journal of the International Folk Music Council 20 (1968): 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Russell Meriwether [La Meri]. “Ethnologic Dance” in The Dance Encyclopedia, ed. Anatole, Chujoy, 177–178. New York: A.S. Barnes, 1949.Google Scholar
Hughes, Russell Meriwether [La Meri]. Total Education in Ethnic Dance. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1977.Google Scholar
Humeniuk, Andrii. Narodne khoreohrafichne mystetstvo Ukrainy [Folk choreographic art of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Akademiia Nauk, 1963.Google Scholar
Humeniuk, Andrii. Ukrains'kinarodni tantsi [Ukrainian folk dances], 2nd ed. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1969.Google Scholar
ICTM Study Group for Folk Dance Terminology. “Foundations for the Analysis of the Structure and Form of Folk Dance: A Syllabus,” trans. William C., Reynolds. Yearbook of the International Folk Music Council 6 (1974): 115–135.Google Scholar
Ivančan, Ivan. Folklor i scena. Priručnik za rukovodioce folklornih skupina [Folklore and the stage: A handbook for leaders of folkloric groups]. Muzicka Biblioteka. Zagreb: Prosvjetni Sabor Hrvatske, 1971.Google Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne L. “Dance and the Interpretation of Pacific Traditional Literature” in Directions in Pacific Traditional Literature: Essays in Honour of Katharine Luomala, eds. Kaeppler, Adrienne L. and Nimmo, H. Ario, 195–216. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne L. “Dance” in International Encyclopedia of Communications 1, ed. Barnouw, Erik, 450–454. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne L.Poetry in Motion: Studies of Tongan Dance. Tonga: Vava'u Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kaposi, Edit and Pesovár, Ernö, eds. The Art of Dance in Hungary, trans. Gaster, Bertha et al. Budapest: Corvina Kiadó, 1985.Google Scholar
Kealiinohomoku, Joann Wheeler. “An Anthropologist Looks at Ballet as a Form of Ethnic Dance.” Impulse, 1969–1970: 24–33.Google Scholar
Kealiinohomoku, Joann Wheeler. “Folk Dance” in Folklore and Folklife: An Introduction, ed. Richard M., Dorson, 381–404. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Klimov, Andrei. Osnovy russkogo narodnogo tantsa [The foundations of Russian folk dance]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1981.Google Scholar
Kürti, László.“The Performing Arts (Review),” Journal for the Anthropological Study of Human Movement 1–2 (1980a): 123–128.Google Scholar
Kürti, László. “The Structure of Hungarian Dance,” Journal for the Anthropological Study of Human Movement 1–1 (1980b): 45–62.Google Scholar
Lange, Roderyk. “On Differences between the Rural and the Urban: Traditional Polish Peasant Dancing,” Yearbook of the International Folk Music Council 6 (1974): 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Roderyk. “The Social and Cultural Significance of Dance as Seen in Peasant and Urban Societies,” Dance Studies 3 (1978/1979): 45–64.Google Scholar
Lange, Roderyk. “The Development of Anthropological Dance Research,” Dance Studies 4 (1980): 1–36.Google Scholar
Lawson, Joan. European Folk Dance: Its National and Musical Characteristics. London: Pitman, 1953. 7th reprint, 1970.Google Scholar
Martin, John. Introduction to the Dance. New York: W.W. Norton, 1939. Republished New York: Dance Horizons, 1965.Google Scholar
Nahachewsky, Andriy. “The Kolomyika: Change and Diversity in Canadian Ukrainian Folk Dance.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, 1991.Google Scholar
Nattiez, Jean-Jacques. Music and Discourse: Toward a Semiology of Music, trans. Abbate, Carolyn. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Nosál', Stefan. Choreografia i'udového tanca [Choreography of folk dance]. Bratislava: Slovenské Pedagogické nakladate'stvo, 1984.Google Scholar
Pihuliak, Ivan. Vasyl' Avramenko a vidrodzhennia ukrains'koho tanku [Vasile Avramenko and the rebirth of Ukrainian dance]. Syracuse, New York: Author, 1979.Google Scholar
Pionyry [Pioneers] (film). National Film Board of Canada, [1950].Google Scholar
Pritz, Alexandra. “Ukrainian Dance in Canada: The First Fifty Years, 1924–1974” in New Soil–Old Roots: The Ukrainian Experience in Canada, ed. Rozumnyj, Jaroslav, 124–154. Winnipeg: Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1983.Google Scholar
Raftis, Alkis. The World of Greek Dance, trans. Doumas, Alexandra. Athens: Finedawn, 1987.Google Scholar
Rath, Emil. The Folk Dance in Education. Minneapolis: Burgess, 1939.Google Scholar
Sheremetyevskaya, Natalia. Rediscovery of the Dance: The State Academic Folk Dance Ensemble of the USSR under the Direction of Igor Moiseyev, trans. Guralsky, J.. [Moscow]: Novosti, [1964?].Google Scholar
Smirnov, Igor Valentinovich. Iskusstvo baletmeistera [The art of the balletmaster]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1986.Google Scholar
Sorell, Walter. The Dance Through the Ages. New York: Grosset and Dunlap, 1967.Google Scholar
Vasylenko, Kim. Kompozytsiia ukrains'koho narodno–stsenichnoho tantsiu [The composition of Ukrainian folk-staged dance]. Raiduha. Bibliotechka khudozhn'oi samodiial'nosti, vol. 13. Kyiv: Mystetstvo, 1983.Google Scholar
Williams, Drid. Ten Lectures on Theories of the Dance. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Yourlo, Youry and Yourlo, Elizabeth. “The Folk Forms: Question and Answer” in The Dance Experience: Readings in Dance Appreciation, eds. Nadel, Myron Howard and Miller, Constance Nadel, 102–104. New York: Universe Books, 1978.Google Scholar