Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:02:13.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Issues in Dance Reconstruction: Karaṇas as Dance Texts in a Cross-cultural Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Alessandra Lopez y Royo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nāṭyaśāstra is a Sanskrit work on drama, dance, and music of uncertain date, which has acquired the status of Ur-text of Indian classical dance. It was in the twentieth century, through the modernization process of bharatanatyam, that the Nāṭyaśāstra and its related texts came to be regarded as setting out the grammar of Indian dance classicism (Coorlawala 1994; Meduri 1996; O'Shea 2001).

Chapter 4 of the Nāṭyaśāstra deals specifically with dance, here distinct from acting, and describes the 108 dance units—Karaṇas—of the tāṇḍava dance of Śiva and their combinations, dance phrases named aṇgahāras (NS 1988–89, 4, w. 1–245). This particular chapter of the Nāṭyaśāstra has attracted attention ever since Naidu, Naidu, and Pantulu published its translation into English, Tānḍavalakṇaṣam, in 1936. Since then there have been other translations of the Nāṭyaśāstra, among which the two volumes by Manmohan Ghosh, in 1951 and 1956 respectively, and different interpretations of the Karaṇas of chapter 4. Readings have drawn on the iconography of the Karaṇas as found at the temples at Thanjavur, Kumbakonam, and Chidambaram in southern India. The karana reliefs on the walls of Kumbakonam and Chidambaram have been identified by inscriptions found on each karaṇa slab, that give the Sanskrit name of the karaṇa as recorded in the Nāṭyaśāstra.

Type
Research Article
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , Winter 2004 , pp. 64 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Benjamin, Walter. 1989. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In The Critical Tradition: Classic Text and Contemporary Trends. Edited by Richter, D., New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Boner, Alice. 1962. Principles of Composition in Hindu Sculpture. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Bose, M. 1970. Classical Indian Dancing: A Glossary. Calcutta: General Printers and Publishers.Google Scholar
Bose, M. 1991. Movement and Mimesis. The Idea of Dance in the Sanskritic Tradition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Bose, M. 2001. Speaking of Dance: The Indian Critique. New Delhi: DK Printworld.Google Scholar
Coorlawala, Uttara Asha. 1994. “Classical and Contemporary Indian Dance: Overview, Criteria and a Choreographic Analysis.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Deheja, Vidya and Yauner Harnisch, Daryl. 1997. “Yoga as the Key to Understanding the Sculpted Body.” In Representing the Body: Gender Issues in Indian Art. Edited by Dehejia, Vidya. New Delhi: Kali for Women in Association with the Book Review Literary Trust.Google Scholar
Erdman, Joan. 2000 “Circling the Square: A Choreographed Approach to the Work of Dr. Kapila Vatsyayan and Western Dance Studies.” Dance Theatre Journals (1): 87–94.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan Leigh. 1995. “Choreographing History.” In Choreographing History. Edited by Foster, Susan Leigh, 3–21. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson Guest, Ann. 1984. Dance Notation: The Process of Recording Movement on Paper. London: Dance Books.Google Scholar
Iyer, Alessandra. 1998. Prambanan, Sculpture and Dance in Ancient Java: A Study in Dance Iconography. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
Kramrisch, Stella. 1946. The Hindu Temple. 2 vols. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
Rota, Ketut. 1991. “Gerak Tari Bali Dilihat Dari Istilah-Istilah Yang Dipergunakan: Studi Eksploratif Pada Legong Kraton Lasern. Laporan Penelitian.” (Movements of Balinese Dance and their technical terminology: an exploration of the Legong Kraton Lasem). Unpublished Research Report, STSI, Den-pasar, Bali.Google Scholar
Lopez y Royo, Alessandra. 2001. “Sculpture, Dance and Heritage: Animating Dance Sequences from Temple Reliefs using Movement Modelling Software.” Internet Archaeology no. 10, University of York, http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issueio/iyer_index.html.Google Scholar
Lopez y Royo, Alessandra. 2003. “Śiwa in Java: the Majestic Great God and the Teacher.” Ars Orientalis 33: 181–196.Google Scholar
Lopez y Royo, Alessandra and Pujawati, Ni Madé. 2003. “Researching Lègong. Somatising Balinese Ideas of Bodily Discipline, Mastery and Virtuosity in a nonBalinese context.” http://www.sfmelrose.u-net.com/virtualvirtuosity/.Google Scholar
Meduri, Avanthi. 1996. “Nation, Woman, Representation: The Sutured History of the Devadasi and her Dance.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Naerebout, F. 1997. Attractive Performances, Ancient Greek Ounce: Three Preliminary Studies. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidu, V. N., Naidu, S., and Pantulu, V. R.. 1936. Tānḍavalakṇaṣam or The Fundamentals of Hindu Dancing. Madras. No publisher mentioned.Google Scholar
Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharatamuni with the commentary by Abhinavabharatī by Abhinavaguptācarya. 1988–1989. 4 vols. 2nd ed. Edited by Nagar, R. S., with Joshi, K. L. and Vedalankar, M. A.. New Delhi: Parimal Publications.Google Scholar
Nor, Mohd Anis Md. 2000. “Kapila Vatsyayan and Dance Scholarship in India and Beyond.” Dance Research Journal 32 (1): 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Conchuir, F. 2001. “Prolegomena to Choreographic Action 2001.” http://www.arcdance.com/pages/choreoprogfreg.html.Google Scholar
O'Shea, Janet. 2000. “Technique and Theory in the Work of Kapila Vatsyayan.” Dance Research Journal 32 (1): 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, Janet. 2001. “At Home in the World: Bharata Natyam's Transnational Traditions.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Riverside.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 1996. ‘The Sanskrit Cosmopolis: Transculturation, Vernacularization and the Question of Ideology.” In Ideology and Status of Sanskrit: Contributions to the History of the Sanskrit Language. Edited by Houben, Jan E. M., 197–247. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, V. 1965. Nṛittaratnāvali of Jayasenapati, critically edited with introduction and notes. Madras: Government Oriental Manuscript Library.Google Scholar
Rocher, Louis. 1981. “The Textual Tradition of the Bharatiyanāṭyaśastra: A Philological Assessment.” Wiener Zeitschrift fur die Kunde Sudasiens 25: 107–130.Google Scholar
Sarabhai, Mallika and Guru, Acharya. 1992. Understanding Kuchipudi. New Delhi: IGNCA and Darpana.Google Scholar
Sedyawati, Edi. 1981. Pertumbuhan Seni Pertunjukan. Jakarta: Penerbit Sinar Harapan.Google Scholar
Sedyawati, Edi. 1982. “The Question of Indian Influence on Ancient Javanese Dance.” RIMA 16 (2): 59–82.Google Scholar
Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher. 1992. Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sircar, Manjushri Chaki. 2003. “Tagore and the Modernization of Dance.” In New Directions in Indian Dance. Edited by Kothari, Sunil, 32–43. Mumbai: Marg Publications.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Padma. 1978. “Karaṇas in Indian Sculpture.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Annamalai University, Chidambaram.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Padma. 1979. Bharata's Art: Now and Then. Bombay and Madras: Bhulabhai Memorial and Nrithyodaya.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Padma. 2003. Karaṇas: Common Dance Codes of India and Indonesia. 3 vols. Chennai: Nrithyodaya.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. 1988. “The Pastness of the Present and the Presence of the Past.” In Authenticity and Early Music: A Symposium. Edited by Kenyon, Nicholas, 137–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Helen. 2004. “Reconstruction and Dance as Embodied Textual Practice.” In Rethinking Dance History. Edited by Carter, Alexandra, 32–45. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1968. Classical Indian Dance in Literature and the Arts. New Delhi: Sangit Natak Akademi.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1977a. “Dance Sculptures of Lara Djonggrang (Prambanan).” Quarterly Journal of the National Centre for the Performing Arts 6 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1977b. “Some Dance Sculptures from Champa.” Quarterly Journal of the National Centre for the Performing Arts 6 (2): 1–17.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1982. Dance in Indian Painting. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1983a. The Square and the Circle of the Indian Arts. New Delhi: Roli Books International.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1983b. Dance Sculptures in Śaraṇgapāṇi Temple. Madras: Society for Archaeological, Historical and Epigraphic Research.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1988. “Dance Scholarship: The Complex Indian Situation.” In Documentation Beyond Performance: Dance Scholarship Today, Essen, June 10—15, 1988. Edited by Au, Susan and Peter, Frank-Manuel, 114–123. Berlin: Centre of the International Theatre Institute.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1996. Bharata: The Nāṭyaśāstra. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.Google Scholar
Winslow's Comprehensive Tamil-English Dictionary 1981. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services.Google Scholar