Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:59:26.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ghostcatching: An Intersection of Technology, Labor, and Race

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Extract

For the past few years, critics, fans, and even Bill T. Jones himself have been talking about the artist's move from explicitly political, identity-based works to an investigation of aesthetics and pure movement. They talk about the more conventional makeup of Jones's current ensemble—the fact that Lawrence Goldhuber and Alexandra Beller are no longer in the company, dancers described in the New York Times as “imperfect” because “chubbier than the norm” (Dunning 2002). They discuss the fact that Jones rarely uses text these days and is no longer confrontational. He dances to Beethover and performs at Lincoln Center with the Chamber Music Society. In a 1997 mterview with Richard Covington, Jones explains this shift in his work by stating, “It's not quite as sexy to talk about. What was being said in those earlier works was as important as how it was being danced. Here, I'm trying to think about how it's danced first, trusting that the political, social, all those things are in our bodies literally, and in the eyes of the beholder” (Covington 1997).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Baker, Houston. 2001. Turning South Again: Re-Thinking Modernism/Re-Reading Booker T. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Francis. 1995. The Tremulous Private Body: Essays on Subjection. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Covington, Richard. 1997. “Is a Beautiful Dance in Itself Enough?” Salon, March 28. http://www.salon.com/march97/jones2970328.html.Google Scholar
Croce, Arlene. 2000. “Discussing the Undiscussable.” In Writing in the Dark, Dancing in the New Yorker, 708719. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Daly, Ann. 1998. “Bill T. Jones in Conversation with Ann Daly.” In Art Performs Life: Merce Cunningham/Meredith Monk/Bill T.Jones, 118125. Minneapolis: Walker Art Center.Google Scholar
De Spain, Kent. 2000a. “Dance and Technology: A Pas de Deux for Post-Humans.” Dance Research Journal 32 (1): 217.Google Scholar
De Spain, Kent. 2000b. “Digital Dance: The Computer Artistry of Paul Kaiser.” Dance Research Journal 32 (1): 1823.Google Scholar
Dunning, Jennifer. 2002. “Dance; Bodies, Imperfect But Still Moving.” The New York Times (March 10): Section 2, pg. 8, col. 1.Google Scholar
Feldman, Allen. 2000. “The Human Touch: Towards a Historical Anthropology and Dream Analysis of Self-Acting Instruments.” In ReMembering the Body. Edited by Brandstetter, Gabriele and Volckers, Höortensia, 224259. Ostfildern, Ger.: Hatje Cantz Verlag.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. 2000. Against Race: Imagining Political Culture Beyond the Color Line. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bill T. 2002. Interview by Michelle Dent and MJ Thompson; New York University; March 20.Google Scholar
Jones, Bill T. and Gillespie, Peggy. 1995. Last Night on Earth. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André. 2000. “The Body in Difference.” RAMA 1 (1): 613.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1976. Capital: Volume I. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew. 1989. No Respect: Intellectuals and Popular Culture. New York: Rout-ledge.Google Scholar