Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:28:12.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finnish Dancers' Attitudes Toward Folk, Competitive Ballroom, Ballet, and Modern Dance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Pipsa Nieminen  and
Väinö Varstala
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One would like to think that dancers hold positive attitudes toward many forms of dance, not just their own. Maybe this is a reason why researchers have not been interested in studying the attitudes of dancers toward dance. However, there have always been conflicts (e.g., which teachers, dancers, dance schools, dance genres should be supported by grants and awards) among dancers in Finland, thus Finnish dance-policy groups have held discussions about improving cooperation both among dancers representing different dance forms and between dancers and artists in other fields. As a result the Dance Council of Finland was founded in 1980 as an organization with board members from various art dance organizations, folk dance organizations and the Finnish Dance Sport Association. The aims of the Dance Council were, among others, to increase cohesion among dancers and to improve the public perception, appreciation and funding of dance. The Dance Council initiated a dance magazine, Tanssi (Dance). However, according to Laine (1991), who was chair of the Dance Council and director of the Finnish National Ballet, the process was problematic and slow.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , Fall 1999 , pp. 63 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. 1977. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84: 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. 1970. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Human Movement. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. 1979. Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin 86: 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D. 1969. Attitudes and attraction. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Berkowitz, L., vol. 4, 35–89. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Devine, P. G. 1989. Automatic and controlled processes in prejudice: The role of stereotypes and personal beliefs. In Attitude Structure and Function, eds. Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J. and Greenwald, A. G., 181–212. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, H. J. 1973. The Social Psychology of Prejudice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ellfeldt, L. 1980. Dance: From Magic to Art. 3rd ed. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H. 1989. On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In Attitude Structure and Function, eds. Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J. and Greenwald, A. G., 153–179. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1972. Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology 23:487–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halstead, C. E. D. 1980. An analysis of attitudes and definitions by selected teachers and pupils toward dance in general and dance in the classroom. Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University. Dissertation Abstracts International 41, 4330A.Google Scholar
Harding, J., Proshansky, H., Kutner, B., and Chein, I. 1969. Prejudice and ethnic relations. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, eds. Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E., 1–76. 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Horwitz, M. and Rabbie, J. M. 1982. Individuality and membership in the intergroup system. In Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, ed. Tajfel, H., 241–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laine, D. 1991. Advancing dance through cooperation. Tanssi 2: 5.Google Scholar
Lange, R. 1990. Dance folklore and the non-professional dance. Dance Studies 14: 11–35.Google Scholar
McSwain, L. 1994. An investigation of attitudes toward dance among Sydney high school students. In Kindle the Fire, 253–260. DaCi Conference Proceedings. Sydney, Australia: Macquarian University, Dance and the Child International.Google Scholar
Morrison, L. and Krohn, J. 1997. Dance perceptions and attitudes of education and physical education students enrolled in a beginning dance class at the University of Saskatchewan. In The Call of Forests and Lakes, 252–260. Proceedings of the 7th International Dance and the Child Conference. Kuopio, Finland: Dance and the Child International.Google Scholar
Neal, N. D. 1983. The effects of a modern dance workshop on the attitude of fourth grade boys and girls. Final Report, 83–209. Richmond, VA: Commission for the Arts.Google Scholar
Neal, N. D. 1985. Assessment of attitude change and position shift in fourth grades after participation in modern dance. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Virginia. Dissertation Abstracts International 47, 2962A.Google Scholar
Neal, N. D. 1991. The effects of participation in dance on the attitudes of French children as measured by domain discrimination. Dance Research Journal 23/2: 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettler, G. 1946. The relation between attitude and information concerning the Japanese in America. American Social Review 11: 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, P. 1997. Participation profiles and socialisation into dance among non-professional dancers. Sport, Education and Society 2: 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, P. 1998b. Participation motives in relation to background and involvement variables among Finnish non-professional dancers. Dance Research Journal 30/2: 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, P. 1998a. Motives for Dancing Among Finnish Folk Dancers, Competitive Ballroom Dancers, Ballet Dancers and Modern Dancers. European Journal of Physical Education 3/1: 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oskamp, S. 1991. Attitudes and Opinions. 2nd. ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Park, B., Ryan, C. S., and Judd, C. M. 1992. Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63:553–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratkanis, A. R. 1989. The cognitive representation of attitudes. In Attitude Structure and Function, eds. Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J. and Greenwald, A. G., 71–98. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reckless, W. C. and Bringen, H. L. 1933. Racial attitudes and information about the Negro. Journal of Negro Education 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokeach, M. 1960. The Open and Closed Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ryan, C. S. 1996. Accuracy of black and white college students' in-group and out-group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11:1114–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, P. 1989. Secondary school pupils' attitudes to dance. In Young People Dancing: An International Perspective, vol. 1, 244–251. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Dance and the Child. London: Dance and the Child International.Google Scholar
Siegel, M. 1977. Watching the Dance Go By. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., and Turner, J.C. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds. Worchel, S. and Austin, W. G., 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tilton, C. L. C. 1983. A comparison of the attitudes of fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students toward the arts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California. Dissertation Abstracts International 44, 1395 A.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. 1982. Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, ed. Tajfel, H., 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D. and Wetherell, M.S. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. 1992. Modern Dance in a Postmodern World: An Analysis of Federal Arts Funding and its Impact on the Field of Modern Dance. Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance.Google Scholar