Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:13:49.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Displacing Vision: Contact Improvisation, Anarchy, and Empathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2018

Hannah Yohalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I specify and historicize the modes of communication that were at play among practitioners of contact improvisation+ and between the dancers and their audiences throughout the 1970s and into the early 1980s. I argue that contact improvisation's turn away from dance as a performed visual medium and toward the tactile experience of the participants exceeds a phenomenological reading and instead needs to be considered in light of anarchist theories of mutual assistance in which group behavior supports individual development. At the same time, however, Steve Paxton, the founder of the form, became concerned precisely with its opacity for an audience. I locate this ambivalent engagement with the performance of a participatory action in the edited video recordings that Paxton made together with Lisa Nelson, Nancy Stark Smith, and Steve Christiansen. These mediated videos, aligned with the rise of video art, paradoxically aim to spark a stronger connection than Paxton thought was possible during the live demonstrations of the form.

Keywords

AnarchycommunicationContact Improvisationempathyintersubjectivitymutual aidSteve Paxtonvideo artYvonne Rainer
Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , August 2018 , pp. 45 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Dance Studies Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank DRJ editor Helen Thomas for the time she spent improving this text with her insightful feedback and editorial assistant Francesca Miles for her invaluable and detailed corrections. Thank you to my anonymous peer readers who saw potential in this piece and made suggestions that let me see how to transform it from an essay into an article and to Hal Foster for his probing comments on its earliest iteration. To Nancy Stark Smith and Lisa Nelson—thank you for helping me make these questions of visibility visible with the photographs and video stills of contact improvisation. I was able to dedicate time to developing this article thanks to the generosity of a fellowship at the Smithsonian American Art Museum. And finally, my thanks are always due to Jane, my most patient of readers, and to Emma, for reading this first and last and for everything in between.

References

Works Cited

Agnew, Spiro. 1972. “Transcript of Nixon's Acceptance Address and Excerpts From Agnew's Speech.” New York Times, August 24. Accessed May 8, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/1972/08/24/archives/transcript-of-nixons-acceptance-address-and-excerpts-from-agnews.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
Albright, Ann Cooper. 2011. “Situated Dancing: Notes from Three Decades in Contact with Phenomenology.” Dance Research Journal 43 (2): 7–18.Google Scholar
Albright, Ann Cooper. 2013. “Feeling In and Out: Contact Improvisation and the Politics of Empathy.” In Touching and Being Touched: Kinesthesia and Empathy in Dance and Movement, edited by Brandstetter, Gabriele, Egert, Gerko, and Zubarik, Sabine, 263–73. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Banes, Sally. 1977. Terpsichore in Sneakers: Post-Modern Dance. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, Robert. (1969) 1985. “Man's Fulfillment in Order and Strife.” In Fictive Certainties: Essays, 111–41. New York: New Directions Books.Google Scholar
Felber, Christian. 2014. “Contact vs. Capitalism.” At the Contactfestival Freiburg, curated by Daniela Schwartz with responses by Adrian Russi, Eckhard Müller, Sara Shelton Mann, Steve Paxton, Daniel Lepkoff, Nita Little, and Nancy Stark Smith. In Contact Quarterly Unbound. Accessed on October 15, 2017. https://contactquarterly.com/cq/unbound/view/contact-vs-capitalism#$.Google Scholar
Foster, Hal. 2014. “To Support.” In Richard Serra: Early Work, edited by Frankel, David, 7–17. New York: Steidl, David Zwirner.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan Leigh. 2011. Choreographing Empathy: Kinesthesia in Performance. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2011. “Editor's Note: What Is Dead and What Is Alive in Dance Phenomenology?” Dance Research Journal 43 (2): 1–4.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. (1967) 1968. “Art and Objecthood.” In Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology, edited by Battcock, Gregory, 116–47. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1966. Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goldman, Danielle. 2010. I Want to Be Ready: Improvised Dance as a Practice of Freedom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Jill. (1968) 1971. “Paxton's People.” In Marmalade Me, 153–155. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Judd, Donald. (1965) 1975. “Specific Objects.” In Complete Writings, 1959–1975, 181–89. Nova Scotia: Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.Google Scholar
Keenaghan, Eric. 2008. “Life, War, and Love: The Queer Anarchism of Robert Duncan's Poetic Action during the Vietnam War.” Contemporary Literature 49 (4): 634–59.Google Scholar
Krauss, Rosalind. 1973. “Sense and Sensibility: Reflection on Post ’60s Sculpture.” ArtForum 12 (3): 43–52.Google Scholar
Krauss, Rosalind. 1976. “Video: The Aesthetics of Narcissism.” October 1 (Spring): 50–64.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Peter Alexeyevich. 1902. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. New York: McClure Phillips.Google Scholar
Lambert-Beatty, Carrie. 2006. “Lives of Performers and the Trouble with Empathy.” In Masterpieces of Modern Cinema, edited by Perry, Ted, 297–322. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert-Beatty, Carrie. 2008. Being Watched: Yvonne Rainer and the 1960s. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lippard, Lucy. (1966) 1971. “Eccentric Abstraction.” In Changing: Essays in Art Criticism, edited by Lippard, Lucy, 98–111. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Mallgrave, Francis, and Ikonomou, Eleftherios, eds. and trans. 1994. Empathy, Form, and Space: Problems in German Aesthetics, 1873–1893. Santa Monica: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1933. The Modern Dance. New York: A. S. Barnes.Google Scholar
Martin, John. (1939) 1965. Introduction to the Dance. New York: Dance Horizons.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (1962) 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Landes, Donald A.. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2013. “Forword.” In Anarchy, State, and Utopia [1974] by Nozick, Robert, xi–xviii. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ness, Sally Ann. 2011. “Foucault's Turn From Phenomenology: Implications for Dance Studies” Dance Research Journal 43 (2): 19–32.Google Scholar
Newman, Barnett. (1968) 1990. “‘The True Revolution is Anarchist!’: Forword to Memoirs of a Revolutionist by Peter Kropotkin.” In Barnett Newman: Selected Writings and Interviews, edited by O'Neill, John P., 44–52. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard. 1969. “Address to the Nation on the War in Vietnam.” November 3. Accessed on October 30, 2017. http://watergate.info/1969/11/03/nixons-silent-majority-speech.html.Google Scholar
Novack, Cynthia. 1990. Sharing the Dance: Contact Improvisation and American Culture. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Overlie, Mary. 1984. “The Studies Project.” In conversation with Jones, Bill T. and Paxton, Steve. Contact Quarterly 9 (3): 30–37.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve. 1972. “The Grand Union.” Drama Review 16 (3): 128–34.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve. (1972) 2006. Magnesium (video recording of a dance). Recorded by Steve Christiansen. On Contact Improvisation Archive: DVD 2. East Charleston, VT: Videoda; Contact Collaborations.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve, Christiansen, Steve, and Smith, Nancy Stark, eds. (1975) 2006. Peripheral Vision (video). Recorded by Steve Christiansen. On Contact Improvisation Archive: DVD 2. East Charleston, VT: Videoda; Contact Collaborations.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve. 1975. Interviewed by Liza Bear “Steve Paxton: Like, a Dialogue with Liza Bear.” Avalanche (Summer): 26–30.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve, Nelson, Lisa, and Christiansen, Steve, eds. (1979) 2006. Chute (video). Recorded by Steve Christiansen. On Contact Improvisation Archive: DVD 1. East Charleston, VT: Videoda; Contact Collaborations.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve, and Nelson, Lisa, eds. (1979) 2006. Soft Pallet (video). Recorded by Steve Christiansen. On Contact Improvisation Archive: DVD 2. East Charleston, VT: Videoda; Contact Collaborations.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve. 1981–82. Interviewed by Folkert Bents. “Contact Improvisation.” Theatre Papers Fourth Series (5): 3–27.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve, and Smith, Nancy Stark. (1987) 2006. Fall After Newton (video). On Contact Improvisation Archive: DVD 1, edited by Steve Paxton, Nancy Stark Smith, Lisa Nelson, and Steve Christiansen. East Charleston, VT: Videoda; Contact Collaborations.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve, and Smith, Nancy Stark. 1988. “Fall After Newton Transcript.” Contact Quarterly 13 (3): 38–39.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve, and Smith, Nancy Stark. 1992. “Chute Transcript.” Contact Quarterly 7 (3/4): 16–17.Google Scholar
Paxton, Steve, and Smith, Nancy Stark. 1997. “Conversation with Steve Paxton.” In On the Edge: Dialogues on Dance Improvisation in Performance, edited by Benoit, Agnes, 45–64. Brussels: Contredanse.Google Scholar
Rainer, Yvonne. 1974. Work 1961–73. Halifax: The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design; New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Rainer, Yvonne, and Paxton, Steve. 1997. “Conversation Between Yvonne Rainer and Steve Paxton.” In On the Edge: Dialogues on Dance Improvisation in Performance, edited by Benoit, Agnes, 15–42. Brussels: Contredanse.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Dee, and Reason, Matthew. 2010. “Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experiences of Watching Dance.” Dance Research Journal 42 (2): 49–75.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Dee, and Reason, Matthew., eds. 2012. Kinesthetic Empathy in Creative and Cultural Practices. Chicago: Intellect Books, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Serra, Richard. 2014. Early Work: Richard Serra, Hal Foster. An Art Book Series Event. Interview by Foster, Hal. New York Public Library. April 30.Google Scholar
Vischer, Robert. (1873) 1994. “On the Optical Sense of Form: A Contribution to Aesthetics.” In Empathy, Form, and Space: Problems in German Aesthetics, 1873–1893, edited and translated by Francis Mallgrave and Eleftherios Ikonomou, 89–124. Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center for the History of Art and the HumanitiesdmGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Anne. 2000. “Performance, Video, and the Rhetoric of Presence.” October 91 (Winter): 59–80.Google Scholar
Weaver, Andy. 2008. “Promoting ‘a community of thoughtful men and women’: Anarchism in Robert Duncan's Ground Work Volumes.” ESC: English Studies in Canada 34 (4): 71–95.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, Heinrich. (1886) 1994. “Prolegomena to a Psychology of Architecture.” In Empathy, Form, and Space: Problems in German Aesthetics, 1873–1893, edited and translated by Mallgrave, Francis and Ikonomou, Eleftherios, 149–90. Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.Google Scholar
Worringer, Wilhelm. (1908) 1997. Abstraction and Empathy: A Contribution to the Psychology of Style. Translated by Bullock, Michael. Chicago: Elephant Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2001. “Beyond Empathy: Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (5–7): 151–67.Google Scholar