Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:23:05.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dance and Subtraction: Notes on Alain Badiou's Inaesthetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2012

Jonathan Owen Clark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In an essay entirely devoted to the subject of dance in Alain Badiou's Handbook of Inaesthetics [Petit manuel d'inesthétique (Badiou 2005b)], we find the following contentious statement: “Dance is not an art, because it is the sign of the possibility of art as inscribed in the body” (69). At first glance, this statement seems strangely familiar to the reader versed in writing about dance, particularly philosophical writing. “Dance is not an art”: Badiou critiques Mallarmé as not realizing this as the true import of his ideas. It is familiar because it attests to a certain problem in aesthetic thinking, one that relates to the placement and position of dance and the works that comprise its history into what can be seen as certain evaluative hierarchies, particularly vis à vis the relation of dance to other art forms, and in particular, those involving speech and writing. Dance seems to suffer from a certain marginalization, subtraction, or exclusion, and its practice seems to occupy a place of the perennial exception, problem, or special case. The strangeness of the statement, on the other hand, relates to the widespread view outside of academic writing that the status of dance “as art” is actually completely unproblematic. What follows therefore is a critical commentary on this assertion of Badiou, placed both in the context of Badiou's writing, and in the wider one pertaining to the problem of exclusion just outlined.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , Winter 2011 , pp. 50 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Badiou, Alain. 2003. Infinite Thought: Truth and the Return to Philosophy. Translated by Clemens, Justin and Feltham, Oliver. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2005a. Being and Event. Translated by Feltham, Oliver. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2005b. “Dance as a Metaphor for Thought.” In Handbook of Inaesthetics. Translated by Toscano, Alberto, 57–72. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2006a. Loqiques des Mondes. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2006b. Polemics. Translated by Corcoran, Steve. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2007a. “A Musical Variant of the Metaphysics of the Subject.” Translated by Clemens, Justin. Parrhesia 2: 29–36.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. 2007b. The Century. Translated by Alberto, Toscano. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Jonathan Owen. Forthcoming. Movement, Mind, Plasticity.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Translated by Tomlinson, Hugh and Galeta, Robert. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guatarri, Félix. 1994. What Is Philosophy? London: Verso.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1995. Dancing Modernism/Performing Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2010. “Editor's Note: States of the Body.” Dance Research Journal 42(1): v–vii.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallward, Peter. 2003. Badiou: A Subject to Truth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1973. “The Vanishing Mediator: Narrative Structure in Max Weber.” New German Critique 1 (Winter): 52–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1967. Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan, Livre XIV: La logique du fantasme, 1966–1967. Unpublished typescript. Session of June 7, 1967.Google Scholar
Malabou, Catherine. 2008. What Should We Do With Our Brain? Bronx, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane. 2001. “Ballets” and “Another Dance Study.” In Mallarme in Prose. Edited by Caws, Mary Ann, 108–16. New York: New Directions.Google Scholar
Meyer, Leonard. 1961. Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, Alva. 2002. “On the Brain Basis of Visual Consciousness: A Sensorimotor Account.” In Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noland, Carrie. 2010. “The Human Situation on Stage: Merce Cunningham, Theodor Adorno, and the Category of Expression.” Dance Research Journal 42(1): 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2009. Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sedofsky, Lauren. 2006. Interview with Alain Badiou. Translated by Sedofsky, Lauren. Artforum November: 246–254.Google Scholar
Sparshott, Francis. 2004. “The Philosophy of Dance: Bodies in Motion, Bodies at Rest.” In The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, edited by Kivy, Peter, 276–90. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar