Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:11:11.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Trends in Contemporary Choreography: A Political Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2014

Alexandra Kolb
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can contemporary choreography claim to challenge the societal status quo by producing liberatory or transgressive work, or has it rather become enshrined in the logic of capitalism and establishment culture? This paper looks critically at twenty-first-century participatory, collaborative modes of performance to investigate how their corresponding aesthetic choices and working methods reflect (often implicit) political stances, such as manifestations of democracy. Using examples from several Western countries, current trends will be assessed against the backdrop of 1960s and 1970s performance theory and practice by assessing the ramifications of the shifting fault lines between dance/performance, the market economy, and political ideologies.

Keywords

capitalismchoreographycollaborationdemocracyexperience economyimmaterial labourimmersive workparticipationpolitics
Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 31 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adorno, Theodor. 1997 [1970]. Aesthetic Theory. Translated by Hullot-Kentor, Robert. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Banes, Sally. 1977. Terpsichore in Sneakers: Post-Modern Dance. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Banes, Sally. 1993. Democracy's Body: Judson Dance Theater, 1962–64. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bannerman, Chris, and Cahal, McLaughlin. 2009. “Collaborative Ethics in Practice-as-Research.” In Practice-as-Research in Performance and Screen, edited by Allegue, Ludivine, Jones, Simon, Kershaw, Baz, Piccini, Angela, 64–80. Basingstoke/Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Barbour, Karen. 2008. “Sustaining Dance Making. Dancer and Choreographers in Collaboration.” Brolga 28: 41–51.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 2006. “The Death of the Author.” In Participation: Documents of Contemporary Art, edited by Bishop, Claire, 41–45. London: Whitechapel.Google Scholar
Beavis, Lynn. 2003. “Performance Art, Censorship and Psychoanalysis.” Unpublished Master's Thesis, Concordia University, Montréal.Google Scholar
Bishop, Claire. 2006. Participation: Documents of Contemporary Art. London: Whitechapel.Google Scholar
Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blair, Tony. 2007. “Blair's speech on the arts in full.” The Guardian Online, March 6, http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/mar/06/politicsandthearts.uk1 (accessed February 10, 2013).Google Scholar
Boal, Augusto. 2008. Theatre of the Oppressed. Translated from Spanish by Charles A. and McBride, Maria-Odilia Leal and Fryer, Emily. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Translated by Pleasance, Simon and Woods, Fronza. Paris: Les presses du reel.Google Scholar
Boyle, Frankie. 2011. Work! Consume! Die! London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Brown, Norman. 1966. Love's Body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Rupert. 2008. “The Arts Column: Why Mrs. Hodge is so wrong about the Proms.” Daily Telegraph Online. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3671615/The-arts-column-Why-Mrs-Hodge-is-so-wrong-about-the-Proms.html (accessed February 10, 2013).Google Scholar
Copeland, Roger. 2011. “The Death of the Choreographer.” In Dance and Politics, edited by Kolb, Alexandra, 39–65. Oxford: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
Counsell, Colin. 1996. Signs of Performance: An Introduction to Twentieth Century Theatre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cumming, Laura. 2012. “Tino Sehgal: These Associations—Review. Turbine Hall, Tate Modern, London.” The Guardian/The Observer, July 29. http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2012/jul/29/tino-sehgal-these-associations-review (accessed September 8, 2013).Google Scholar
Cvejic, Bojana. 2010. “Xavier Le Roy: The Dissenting Choreography of One Frenchman Less.” http://www.xavierleroy.com/page.php?id=4b530eff077090c4cdd558852f04f24fb0840bae&lg=en (accessed July 28, 2013).Google Scholar
Debord, Guy. 1994 [1967]. The Society of the Spectacle. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Dickson, Andrew. 2011. “Immersive Theatre: It Was a Ghost in the Library with a Violin…” The Guardian Online, July 4. http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2011/jul/04/immersive-theatre (accessed January 2, 2012).Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1989 [1962]. The Open Work. Translated by Cancogni, Anna. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Forsythe Company. 1997. “White Bouncy Castle.” http://www.williamforsythe.de/installations.html (accessed February 10, 2013).Google Scholar
Foster, Susan. 2008. “Choreographies and Choreographers: Four Definitions of the Terms.” In Modern Dance: Multifaceted Dimension, edited by Bandopadhay, Scruti, 5–26. Kolkata, India: Rabindra Bharati University.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2011. “Archaeological Choreographic Practices: Foucault and Forsythe.” History of the Human Sciences 24(4): 97–112.Google Scholar
Gill, Rosalind, and Andy, Pratt. 2008. “In the Social Factory? Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work.” Theory, Culture & Society 25(7–8): 1–30.Google Scholar
Gladstone, Valerie. 2011. “Choreographer Jérôme Bel explains his philosophy of dance.” The Boston Globe, November 3. http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2011/11/03/choreographer-jerome-bel-explains-his-philosophy-dance/lqzb1mBpg3b75eKS2L9xGL/story.html (accessed June 24, 2013).Google Scholar
Gormley, Antony. 1997. “Review.” The Guardian, April 15, http://www.artangel.org.uk//projects/1997/tight_roaring_circle/press_coverage/press_coverage (accessed August 24, 2013).Google Scholar
Groys, Boris. 2008a. Art Power. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Groys, Boris. 2008b. “A Genealogy of Participatory Art.” In The Art of Participation: 1950 to Now, edited by Frieling, Rudolf, 19–31. San Francisco Museum of Modern art in association with London and New York: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Hammergren, Lena. 2011. “Dance and Democracy in Norden.” In Dance and the Formation of Norden: Emergences and Struggles, edited by Vedel, Karen, 175–196. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Antonio, Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Headlong Dance Theater. N.d. Home Page. http://headlong.org (accessed February 20, 2013).Google Scholar
Heaton, Roger. 1995. “Music for Dance.” Dance Theatre Journal 11(4): 12–15.Google Scholar
Java Dance Company. 2011. Home Page. http://www.javadancecompany.co.nz (accessed January 3, 2013).Google Scholar
Klein, Gabriele. 2012. “Labour, Life, Art: On the Social Anthropology of Labour.” Performance Research 17(6): 4–13.Google Scholar
Kunst, Bojana. 2012. “Art and Labour: On Consumption, Laziness and Less Work.” Performance Research 17(6): 116–125.Google Scholar
Laermans, Rudi. 2012. “‘Being in Common’: Theorizing Artistic Collaboration.” Performance Research 17(6): 94–102.Google Scholar
Lavender, Larry. 2011. “Sociography.” Brolga 35: 17–26.Google Scholar
Lazzarato, Maurizio. 1996. Immaterial Labour. Translated by Colilli, Paul and Emery, Ed. http://generation-online.org/c/fcimmateriallabour3.htm (accessed July 23, 2013).Google Scholar
Levitas, Ruth. 1998. The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. Houndsmill/Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Machon, Josephine. 2013. Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance. Houndsmill/Basingstoke, UK: PalgraveMacmillan.Google Scholar
Mackrell, Judith. 1991. “Post-Modern Dance in Britain: An Historical Essay.” Dance Research 9(1): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matarasso, François. 1997. Use or Ornament? The Use of Participation in the Arts. Stroud, UK: Comedia.Google Scholar
McKinnie, Michael. 2004. “A Sympathy for Art: The Sentimental Economies of New Labour Arts Policy.” In Blairism and the War of Persuasion: Labour's Passive Revolution, edited by Steinberg, Deobrah and Johnson, Richard, 186–203. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Milder, Patricia. 2011. “Teaching as Art: The Contemporary Lecture Performance.” PAJ 97: 13–27.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1859. On Liberty. London: Parker & Son.Google Scholar
Mitropoulous, Angela. 2005. “Precari-us.” Mute: Culture and Politics after the Net 1(29): 88–96.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal, and Ernesto, Laclau. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Pine, Joseph, and James, Gilmore. 1999. The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre and Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Punchdrunk. 2013. The Drowned Man: A Hollywood Fable. Programme notes from a performance at Temple Studios, London.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. “The Emancipated Spectator.” http://digital.mica.edu/departmental/gradphoto/public/Upload/200811/Ranciere%20%20spectator.pdf (accessed December 3, 2012).Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2011. “Does Democracy Mean Something?” In Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics, edited by Corcoran, Steven, 45–60. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Reardon, Christopher. 1999. “Hey, Rudy! Look Over Here! Felix Ruckert's Proposition.” The Village Voice, October 19. http://www.villagevoice.com/1999-10-19/dance/hey-rudy-look-over-here/full/ (accessed February 24, 2013).Google Scholar
Rebentisch, Juliane. 2013. “The Question of the Aesthetic.” In Dance [and] Theory, edited by Brandstetter, Gabriele and Klein, Gabriele, 89–96. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1988. Performance Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Searle, Adrian. 1997. “Review.” The Guardian, March 29. http://www.artangel.org.uk//projects/1997/tight_roaring_circle/press_coverage/press_coverage (accessed August 24, 2013).Google Scholar
Smith, Rupert. 2002. “Join the Club.” The Guardian, May 14. http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2002/may/14/artsfeatures (accessed February 25, 2013).Google Scholar
Thatcher, Margaret. 1987. “Epitaph for the Eighties? ‘There is no such thing as society’: Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Talking to Women's Own Magazine.” Briandeer.com, October 31. http://briandeer.com/social/thatcher-society.htm (accessed September 2013).Google Scholar
Tomlin, Liz. 2013. “Arts Council Policy and Unintended Consequences: One Possible Route to the Growth of Interactive Performance in the UK.” Unpublished paper presentation, delivered at the Institut del Teatre in Barcelona, July 24.Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard. 1993. The Art-Work of the Future. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
White, Gareth. 2012. “On Immersive Theatre.” Theatre Research International 37(3): 221–235.Google Scholar
Zero Degrees (DVD). 2008. Akram Khan, Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui, Antony Gormley, Nitin Sawhney. Sadler's Wells on Screen. Axiom Films International Limited, London.Google Scholar