Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:17:25.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Work and Reconstructed Work in the Context of Dance Repertory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Amy Ginsburg  and
James Penrod
Amy Ginsburg
Affiliation:
Dickinson College
James Penrod
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Dialogue
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Smith, A. William discusses the terms “reconstruction,” “recreation,” “resetting,” and “revival” in his paper, “Flickers: A Fifty-Year Old Flicker of the Weidman Tradition,” in Dance ReConstructed: Conference Proceedings, A Conference on Modern Dance Art Past, Present, Future—October 16–17, 1992 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Society of Dance History Scholars, 1993). See especially pp. 248–51.Google Scholar

2. See, for example, Siegel's, Marcia article, “Loss and Recall” in Dance Research Journal 28/2: 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar