Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:55:27.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fedor Lopukhov: A Soviet Choreographer in the 1920s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Elizabeth Souritz ,
Lynn Visson  and
Sally Banes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Elizabeth Souritz's book Soviet Choreographers in the 1920s (first published in the U.S.S.R. as Khoreograficheskoe iskusstvo dvadtsatykh godov [Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1979) is presently in preparation for publication by Dance Horizons. The book focuses on one particular aspect of Soviet choreography in the 1920s – the changes within the ballet institution, that is, the state lyric theaters. Although her main purpose is to excavate the choreography itself, and especially the work of three key artists (Alexander Gorsky, Kasian Goleizovsky, and Fedor Lopukhov), in the course of reading about the ballets, we also learn a great deal about the dance and theater life on the periphery, about who was included and who excluded from the mainstream and why, about the aesthetic and political debates that brought some of the projects to fruition and buried others, and about the ways in which the period served as a kind of linchpin in the history of ballet. We see in Souritz's account a microcosm both of the larger Soviet dance world of the 1920s and of the larger picture of state cultural institutions.

The book sheds a welcome light on an era, a group of choreographers, and a series of ballets that have previously been little known in the West. We have been tantalized by brief references in the available literature to the revolutionary ballets celebrating the October Revolution of 1917, to the revisions of the classics that remain in the Soviet repertory, to the remarkable innovations inspired by modernist experiments in all the arts of the period, and to the “model ballet” The Red Poppy. These topics fascinate us not only for their own sake, for they have been a missing chapter in our knowledge of dance history, but also because they illuminate the history of American ballet, and in particular the early roots of George Balanchine's oeuvre.

Type
Research Article
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , Fall 1985 , pp. 3 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Lopukhov's biographer, Galina Dobrovolskaya, dates them 1918.

2. Lopukhov, F., Shestdesiat let v balete (Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1966), p. 213Google Scholar.

3. Lopukhov, F., Puti baletmeistera (Berlin: Petropolis, 1925), pp. 50–51Google Scholar.

4. See Dobrovolskaya, G., Fedor Lopukhov (Moscow-Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1976), pp. 103–104Google Scholar.

5. Lopukhov, F., Puti baletmeistera, p. 50Google Scholar.

6. See Twysden, A., Alexandra Danilova (London: C.W. Beaumont, 1945), p. 45Google Scholar.

7. Soliannikov, N., “Vospominaniia,” manuscript, Central Research Library of The Ail-Union Theatrical Society, p. 309Google Scholar.

8. Copy of minutes of the meeting. Archives of Yuri Slonimsky. State Central Theatrical Library.

9. Volynsky, A., “Tantssimfoniia,” Zhizn iskusstva, 13 March 1923, no. 10. p. 3Google Scholar.

10. Velichie mirozdaniia, tantssimfoniia Fedora Lopukhova, muz. L. Betkhovena (4-ia simfonila) s avtosiluetom Pavla Goncharova (Petersburg: G.P. Lubarsky, 1922), p. 4Google Scholar.

11. See Piotrovsky, A., “My eto peresmotrim,” Zhizn iskusstva, 29 September 1929, no. 39, p. 4Google Scholar.

12. Lopukhov, F., “Moi otvet,” Zhizn iskusstva, 21 February 1922, no. 8, p. 3Google Scholar.

13. Lopukhov, , Puti baletmeistera, pp. 93, 97, 99, 100Google Scholar.

14. See Lopukhov, , Shestdesiat let v balete, p. 245Google Scholar.

15. Gvozdev, A., “Nakanune novogo baleta,” Krasnaia gazeta, evening edition, 30 September 1924, no. 222Google Scholar.

16. (Nasilov), N.N., “Revoliutsionnyi balet,” Zhizn iskusstva, 26 August 1924, no. 35, p. 18Google Scholar.

17. See ‘Shcheloch ili kislota?“ Ezhenedelnik akademicheskikh teatrov v Leningrade, 13 May 1924, no. 13, p. 8Google Scholar.

18. “Programma baleta Krasnyi vikhr,” Rabochii i teatr, 3 November 1924, no. 7, p. 22Google Scholar.

19. Brodersen, Y., “Obnovlenie li?” Robochii i teatr, 10 November 1924, no. 8, p. 8Google Scholar.

20. Andreyev, B., (Bashinsky, B.), “Ak.-instsenirovka,” Rabochii i teatr, 10 November 1924, no. 8, p. 7Google Scholar.

21. Lavrovsky, L., “O putiakh razvitiia sovetskogo baleta,” in Muzykalnyi teatr i sovremennost (Moscow: All-Union Theatrical Society, 1962), p. 10Google Scholar.

22. Lopukhov, , Shestdesiat let v balete, p. 255Google Scholar.

23. Gvozdev, A., “Probuzhdenie Spiasshchei krasavitsy,” Zhizn iskusstva, 11 March 1924, no. 11, p. 7Google Scholar.

24. “Khronika. Ak.-teatry,” Rabochii i teatr, 24 November 1924, no. 10, p. 17Google Scholar.

25. “Pervomaiskie zrelishcha,” Zhizn iskusstva, 4 May 1920, no. 442Google Scholar.

26. Peterburgskii balet v Moskve,” Zhizn iskusstva, 9 September 1920, no. 552.

27. Lopukhov, F., “Staro-russkii glum. K postanovke Baiki v Ak.-balete,” Rabochii i teatr, 7 December 1926, no. 49, p. 11Google Scholar.

28. Glebov, Igor (Asafiev, B.), “Snegurochka. (Akademicheskii teatr opery i baleta),” Zhizn iskusstva, 12-13 February 1921, no. 675-676Google Scholar.

29. “Khronika. Balet i opera,” Zhizn iskusstva, 18 October 1921, no. 813Google Scholar.

30. Lopukhov, , Shestdesiat let v balete, p. 247Google Scholar.

31. Gvozdev, A., “Dve novye postanovki,” Zhizn iskusstva, 15 April 1924, no. 16, p. 10Google Scholar.

32. Soliannikov N. “Vospominaniia,” p. 311.

33. Stravinsky, , Igor, , Khronika moei zhizni (Leningrad: Muzgiz, 1963), p. 159Google Scholar.

34. Glebov, Igor (Asafiev, B.), Kniga o Stravinskom (Leningrad: Triton, 1929), p. 155Google Scholar.

35. Gvozdev, A., “Bakia Stravinskogo,” Zhizn iskusstva, 11 January 1927, no. 2, p. 12Google Scholar.

36. Glebov, (Asafiev, ), Kniga o Stravinskom, p. 155Google Scholar.

37. Soliannikov, , “Vospominaniia,” p. 322Google Scholar.

38. Gvozdev, A.. “Nerazberikha pro lisu, petukha i prochuiu tvar.” Krasnaia gazeta, evening edition, 4 January 1927, no. 3Google Scholar.

39. Rimsky-Korsakov, A., “Nerazberikha pro lisu, petukha i prochuiutvar,” Krasnaia gazeta, evening edition, 4 January 1927, no. 3Google Scholar.

40. Petushkov, Evstafy, “Svistuny na Baike,” Zhizn iskusstva, 25 January 1927, no. 4, p. 20Google Scholar.

41. Glebov, (Asafiev, ), Kniga o Stravinskom, p. 151Google Scholar.

42. Gvozdev, , “Baika Stravinskogo,” p. 13Google Scholar.

43. Mungalova, O., “Vospominaniia,” manuscript, All-Union Theatrical Society Archive, pp. 11–12Google Scholar.

44. Lopukhov, , Shestdesiat let v balete, p. 250Google Scholar.

45. Mungalova, , “Vospominaniia,” p. 15Google Scholar.

46. Lopukhov, A., “Dvadtsat let kharakternogo tantsovshchika,” manuscript, All-Union Theatrical Society Archive, p. 22Google Scholar.

47. Mungalova, , “Vospominaniia,” p. 15Google Scholar.

48. Brodersen, Y., “Ledianaia deva v Ak.-balete,” Rabochii i teatr, 1 May 1927, no. 18, p. 9Google Scholar.

49. “Ledianaia deva. Solveig,” Rabochii i teatr, 19 April 1927, no. 16, p. 12Google Scholar.

50. Sollertinsky, I., “Ledianaia deva. (Iubileinyi spektakl baletmeistera F. Lopukhova),” Leningradskaia pravda, 29 April 1927, no. 96Google Scholar.

51. Gvozdev, A., “O reforme baleta,” Zhizn iskusstva, 3 January 1928, no. 1, p. 5Google Scholar.

52. Gvozdev, A., “Reforma baleta. Klassicheskii tanets,” Zhizn iskusstva, 10 January 1928, no. 2, p. 4Google Scholar.