Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:48:10.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dialogue in Dance Studies Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Ann Dils  and
Jill Flanders Crosby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In writing this paper, we—Jill Crosby and Ann Dils—render into text six years of sporadic dialogues. Through our explanation and examination of the 1994 movement analysis and description project that began our exchanges and discussion of subsequent readings, we hope to explore important aspects of dance studies research. Our use and understanding of Laban-based movement analysis as a tool for understanding movement as it is felt and observed, awareness of concepts of dialogue and the dialogical process as potential frameworks, critical lenses, and theoretical bases for dance studies research, and adaptation of the interpretive paradigm to suit dance research are especially important to this exploration. Little of our text is written in dialogue form (Crosby:, Dils:); rather, we hope, by drawing examples from our project, Crosby's dissertation, and the works of other researchers, to capture the bubbling-up of understanding that stems from the cooperative and confrontational exchanges of dance studies research.

Over a three-month period in 1994, we conducted a movement analysis and description project as part of Crosby's work for her doctoral dissertation, “Will the Real Jazz Dance Please Stand Up? A Critical Examination of the Roots and Essence of Jazz Dance with Implications for Education.” Crosby investigated the aesthetic shapings of jazz expression inclusive of its West African roots from a cross-disciplinary perspective, using ethnographic methods as tools for understanding artistic form (Crosby 1995). An arts educator and dancer, Crosby wanted to establish a pool of descriptive and potentially inherent characteristics for music-based jazz dance. These characteristics would comprise a personal definition for the form and provide Crosby with a point of departure for a discussion of jazz as a movement tradition.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , Summer 2001 , pp. 62 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Asante, M. K. and Asante, K. W. eds. 1990. African Culture: The Rhythms of Unity. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Banes, S. 1994. “Power and the Dancing Body.” In Writing Dancing in the Age of Postmodernism. Edited by Banes, Sally. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Bull [Novack], C. J. Cohen. 1988a. “Contact Improvisation: A Photo Essay and Summary Movement Analysis.” The Drama Review 32 (4): 120–134.Google Scholar
Bull [Novack], C. J. Cohen. 1988b. “Looking at Movement as Culture: Contact Improvisation to Disco.” The Drama Review 32(4): 102–119.Google Scholar
Bull [Novack], C. J. Cohen. 1990. Sharing the Dance: Contact Improvisation and American Culture. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Chernoff, J. M. 1979. African Rhythm and Sensibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crosby, J. 1995. “Will the Real Jazz Dance Please Stand Up? A Critical Examination of the Roots and Essence of Jazz Dance with Implications for Education.” Ed.D. dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Daly, A. 1988. “Movement Analysis: Piecing Together the Puzzle.” The Drama Review 32(4): 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Y. 1995. Rumba: Dance and Social Change in Contemporary Cuba. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dehn, M. 1950. The Spirit Moves. (Vols. 1–3.) New York: Dance Division, New York Public Library for the Performing Arts. Videocassette.Google Scholar
Dell, C. 1970. A Primer for Movement Description. New York: Dance Notation Bureau.Google Scholar
Desmond, J. C. 1997. “Embodying Difference: Issues in Dance and Cultural Studies.” In Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, J. C. 2000. “Terra Incognita: Mapping New Territory in Dance and Cultural Studies.” Dance Research Journal 32(1): 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon-Gottschild, B. 1996. Digging the Africanist Presence in American Performance: Dance and Other Contexts. Westport, CT.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Emery, L. F. 1988. Black Dance From 1619 to Today. 2nd ed., rev. Pennington, NJ: Princeton Book Company.Google Scholar
Feld, S. 1982. Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Graumann, C. F. 1995. “Commonality, Mutuality, Reciprocity: A Conceptual Introduction.” In Mutualities in Dialogue. Edited by Markova, Ivana, Graumann, Carl F. and Foppa, Klaus. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, P., and Speed, F. (Producers); Doma, O. (Co-producer, Reel 3). n.d. Studies in Nigerian Dance 1966–1970. Made in association with the Universities of Ibadan and Ife, Nigeria. Film.Google Scholar
Hazzard-Gordon, K. 1990. Jookin': The Rise of Social Dance Formations in African American Culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Jablonko, A., and Kagan, E. 1988. “An Experiment in Looking: Reexamining the Process of Observation.” The Drama Review 32 (4): 148–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne. 2000. “Dance Ethnography and the Anthropology of Dance.” Dance Research Journal 32(1): 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepczyk, B. F. 1981. “A Contrastive Study of Movement Style in Dance Through the Laban Perspective.” Ed.D. dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University. Cited p. 109 in Bull [Novack] 1988b.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., and Fischer, M. J. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ness, S. A. 1992. Body, Movement and Culture: Kinesthetic and Visual Symbolism in a Philippine Community. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ness, S. A. 1996. “Dancing in the Field: Notes from Memory.” In Corporealities. Edited by Foster, Susan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pforsich, J. 1978. “Labananalysis and Dance Style Research: An Historical Survey and Report of the 1976 Ohio State University Research Workshop.” Essays in Dance Research, Congress on Research in Dance Annual 9: 59–74.Google Scholar
Ringshout. n.d. Gift of Elaine Nichols, curator at the Soum Carolina State Museum, to the Dance Division, New York Public Library for the Performing Arts. Videocassette.Google Scholar
Sklar, D. 1991a. “On Dance Ethnography.” Dance Research Journal 23 (1): 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, D. 1991b. “Five Premises for a Culturally Sensitive Approach to Dance.” DCA News, (summer): 4, 9.Google Scholar
Sklar, D. 2000. “Reprise: On Dance Ethnography.” Dance Research Journal 32(1): 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedlock, D. and Mannheim, B., eds. 1995. The Dialogic Emergence of Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. F. 1974. African Art in Motion: Icon and Act. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. F. 1983. Flash of the Spirit: African and Afro-American Art and Philosophy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar