Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:06:39.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dancer as Masochist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Jock Abra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

What various experiences does dance elicit? And why do people involve themselves in it? Aestheticians have often debated such questions from an audience standpoint, but much less frequently from that of the dancer. Yet many theories, representing mainstream psychology's various subdisciplines, as well as related traditions such as psychoanalysis and existentialism, do suggest, either openly or by implication, reasons for indulging in creative work. Of these, a particularly promising avenue to the dancer's psychology has come from an author who is seldom thought of as a “psychologist” at all. We speak of Jean-Paul Sartre, and his analysis of interpersonal interaction known as the gaze, or the look (le regard).

Sheets has used other Sartrian notions to describe the phenomenology of dance from an audience perspective, and the gaze figures prominently in Sartre's own analyses of such creative persons as Baudelaire, Jean Genet, and even himself, but to our knowledge it has not previously been applied to the dancer. So that will be our purpose here. However, an initial clarification, and disclaimer, seems appropriate. We shall describe the gaze more fully later, but essentially it portrays all human interactions, without exceptions, as struggles for power and dominance. Therefore such interactions allow only two reactions: the sadistic, that seeks such power over others, and the masochistic, that submits to others, voluntarily or otherwise. We will argue that dancers almost inevitably must choose the second reaction, which may help us understand some of their typical psychological characteristics. But we must emphasize that in Sartre's usage, and therefore ours, the term “masochism” is not pejorative, nor necessarily suggestive of pathology. Everyone, the psychologically afflicted and all others, must choose one of these two reactions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , Winter 1988 , pp. 33 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Abra, J.C.Assaulting Parnassus: Theoretical Views of Creativity. University Press of America (in press)Google Scholar.

2. Sartre, J.P.Being and Nothingness. New York: The Citadel Press, 1969Google Scholar.

3. Sheets, M.The Phenomenology of Dance. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1966Google Scholar.

4. Sartre, J.P.Baudelaire. Norfolk, Conn.: New Directions, 1950Google Scholar.

5. Sartre, J.P.Saint Genet: Actor and Martyr. New York: New American Library, 1971Google Scholar.

6. Sartre, J.P.The Words. New York: Vintage Books, 1981Google Scholar.

7. Siegel, M.The Shapes of Change: Images of American Dance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1979Google Scholar.

8. de Mille, A.Dance to the Piper. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1952Google Scholar.

9. de Mille, A.Speak to Me, Dance with Me. New York: Popular Library, 1973Google Scholar.

10. Mazo, J.Dance is a Contact Sport. New York: Da Capo Press, Inc., 1974Google Scholar.

11. Gruen, J.The Private World of Ballet. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1976Google Scholar.

12. Mazo, p. 100.

13. McDonagh, D.The Rise and Fall and Rise of Modern Dance. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co., 1970Google Scholar.

14. Sorrell, W.The Dancer's Image: Points and Counterpoints. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971, p. 11Google Scholar.

15. Gruen, J. “Interview with Michael Somes.” In The Private World of Ballet, pp. 162–168Google Scholar.

16. Siegel, p. xiii.

17. Klosty, J.Merce Cunningham. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1975Google Scholar.

18. Guilford, J.P.The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967Google Scholar.

19. Gardner, H.Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 1983Google Scholar.

20. Ibid.

21. Abra, J.C.

22. Dellas, M., & Gaier, E.L. “Identification of Creativity: The Individual.” Psychological Bulletin, 73 (1970): 55–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

23. Getzels, J.W., & Jackson, P.W. “The Highly Intelligent and the Highly Creative Adolescent.” In verrnon, P.E. (Ed.), Creativity. New York: Penguin Books, 1970, pp. 189–202Google Scholar.

24. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. “A New Look at the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction. In Vernon, RE. (Ed.), Creativity, pp. 235–256Google Scholar.

25. Torrence, E.P.Guiding Creative Talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26. Gruen, J. “Interview with Antoinette Sibley and Anthony Dowell.” In The Private World of Ballet, p. 124Google Scholar.

27. Gruen, J. “Interview with Michael Coleman and Jennifer Penny.” In The Private World of Ballet, p. 150Google Scholar.

28. Gruen, J. “Interview with Michael Somes.” In The Private World of Ballet, p. 166Google Scholar.

29. Gruen, J. “Interview with Ivan Nagy.” In The Private World of Ballet, p. 231Google Scholar.

30. Gruen, J. “Interview with Merle Park.” In The Private World of Ballet, p. 128Google Scholar.

31. Stern, A.Sartre: His Philosophy and Existential Psychoanalysis. New York: Dell Publishing Co., 1967Google Scholar.

32. Sartre, J.P.Existentialism and Humanism. London: Methuen, 1948Google Scholar.

33. Sartre, J.P.The Age of Reason. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1947, p. 249Google Scholar.

34. Grene, M.Dreadful Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948Google Scholar.

35. Fromm, E.The Fear of Freedom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd., 1960Google Scholar.

36. Sartre, J.P.Being and Nothingness, p. 55Google Scholar.

37. Stern, J.P. Sartre: His Existential Philosophy and Psychoanalysis.

38. Sartre, J.P. Being and Nothingness.

39. Maslow, A.H.The Psychology of Science: A Reconnaissance. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co., 1969Google Scholar.

40. Sartre, J.P.Being and Nothingness, p. 231Google Scholar.

41. de Beauvoir, S.The Second Sex. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1962Google Scholar.

42. Camus, A.The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969, p. 73Google Scholar.

43. Getzels, J.W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M.The Creative Vision. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 1976Google Scholar; Tate, A. “Narcissus as Narcissus.” In Ghiselin, B. (Ed.), The Creative Process. New York: New American Library, 1952, pp. 134–145Google Scholar; Beckman, M. “On My Painting.” In Herbert, R.L. (Ed.), Artists on Art. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964, pp. 131–137Google Scholar.

44. Storr, A.The Dynamics of Creation. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Pelican Books, 1976Google Scholar.

45. Sartre, J.P. “The Quest for the Absolute.” In Essays in Aesthetics. New York: The Citadel Press, 1966Google Scholar.

46. Abra, J.C.

47. Sartre, J.P. Saint Genet: Actor and Martyr.

48. Ibid., p. 68.

49. Sartre, J.P. The Words.

50. Sartre, J.P. Being and Nothingness.

51. Wallas, G. “The Art of Thought.” In Vernon, P.E. (Ed.), Creativity, pp. 91–97Google Scholar

52. Camus, A.The Rebel. New York: Vintage Books, 1956Google Scholar.

53. Sartre, J.P. Saint Genet: Actor and Martyr.

54. Gruen, J. “Interview with Jorge Donn.” In The Private World of Ballet, p. 189Google Scholar.

55. Rotter, J.B.Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56. Maslow, A.H.Toward a Psychology of Being. Toronto: D. van Nostrand, 1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar.