Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:44:19.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Characterization of Dance Teacher Behaviors in Technique and Choreography Classes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Madeleine Lord
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Very little is known about the process of teaching dance as it naturally occurs in daily classes at university level (Lunt, 1974). In the actual context of research on teaching, the identification of significant variables necessitates the systematic description of teaching activities as they naturally occur in class. The present study is a systematic observation of two types of dance classes: choreography and technique. It seeks to characterize the behaviors of two experienced teachers observed in their regular classes at the university level. This characterization is made in terms of (a) the proportion of verbal and nonverbal behaviors (b) the directness or indirectness of the instructional approach, and (c) the dominant teaching patterns. The study is regarded as a first attempt to gather valid descriptive data to be used as basis for identifying significant issues in the teaching of dance and eventually in dance teacher education.

Observational studies conducted in movement classes reveal that few systems specifically designed to objectively describe movement classes (Anderson and Barrette, 1978; Costello and Laubach, 1978; Fishman and Tobey, 1978) have satisfied standards of research objectivity and reliability. They show, on the other hand, that numerous valid observational instruments have been developed by adapting systems designed for academic settings to make them compatible with the particularities of the movement setting.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 14 , Issue 1-2 , 1981 , pp. 15 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Amidon, Edmund J. and Flanders, Ned. A. The role of the teacher in the classroom. Minnesota: Association for Productive Teaching, 1971.Google Scholar
Anderson, William G. and Barrette, Gary T. “Teacher behavior,” In What's Going on in Gym: Descriptive Studies of Physical Education Classes, Monograph 1, Motor Skills: Theory into Practice, 1978, 25–38.Google Scholar
Batchelder, Ann S. Process objectives and their implementation in elementary math, english and physical education classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1976.Google Scholar
Berliner, David C., Tikunoff, William J. The California beginning teacher evaluation study: Overview of the ethnographic study. The Journal of Teacher Education, 27 (1): 1976, 24–30.Google Scholar
Cheffers, John T., Amidon, Edmund J. and Rodgers, Ken D. Interaction analysis: an application to nonverbal activity. Minnesota: Association for Productive Teaching, 1974.Google Scholar
Cheffers, John T. and Mancini, , Victor, H. “Teacher-Student Interaction,” In Anderson, W.G., Barrette, G.T. (Eds.), What's Going on in Gym: Descriptive Studies of Physical Education Classes. Monograph 1, Motor Skills: Theory into Practice, 1978, 39–51.Google Scholar
Costello, John and Laubach, Susan. “Student Behavior,” In Anderson, W.G., Barrette, G.T. (Eds.), What's Going on in Gym: Descriptive Studies of Physical Education Classes. Monograph 1, Motor Skills: Theory into Practice, 1978, 11–25.Google Scholar
Fishman, Sylvia and Tobey, Charles. “Augmented Feedback,” In Anderson, W.G., Barrette, G.T. (Eds.), What's Going on in Gym: Descriptive Studies of Physical Education Classes. Monograph I, Motor Skills: Theory into Practice, 1978, 51–63.Google Scholar
Flanders, Ned A. Teacher Influence, Pupil attitudes, and achievement; final report, United States Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Cooperative research project no. 397. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1960.Google Scholar
Flanders, Ned A. Analyzing teacher behavior. Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley, 1970.Google Scholar
Grant, Barbara M. Analyzing teacher nonverbal activity. Theory into Practice, 16 (3): 1977, 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.V., Delquadri, J.C. and Harris, J.W. Opportunity to respond: A new focus in the field of applied behaviors analysis. Paper presented at Midwest Association of Applied Behaviors Analysis, 1977.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Alma. Creating through dance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.Google Scholar
H'Doubler, Margaret. Dance: a creative art experience. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Joyce, Bruce. The “models of teaching” community: What have we learned. Paper presented at the Booksend Foundation, California, 1975.Google Scholar
Joyce, Bruce and Harootunian, Berj. The structure of teaching. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1967.Google Scholar
Joyce, Bruce and Hodges, Richard E. Instructional flexibility training. The Journal of Teacher Education, 17(4): 1966, 409–416.Google Scholar
Joyce, Bruce and Hunt, David E. Teacher trainee personality and initial teaching style. American Educational Research Journal, 4(3): 1967, 253–259.Google Scholar
Lippincott, Gertrude. Out of old contexts into new: The schools and the new dance. Dance Scope, Spring, 1970, 26–38.Google Scholar
Lockhart, Ailene and Pease, Esther. Modern dance: Building and teaching lessons, 4th ed. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown Co., 1973.Google Scholar
Lord, Madeleine. The teaching of dance: A characterization of dance teacher behaviors in technique and choreography classes at the university level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1979.Google Scholar
Lunt, Joanne. A procedure for systematically describing teacher-student verbal and nonverbal interaction in the teaching of choreography. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1974.Google Scholar
Moore, Elvi. The performer-teacher: An interview with Bella Lewitsky Dance Scope, Fall–Winter, 1973–1974, 7–11.Google Scholar
Ririe, Shirley. “Selection as a Process.” In Gray, M. (Ed.), Focus on Dance V: Composition. Washington: American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1969, 45–46.Google Scholar
Siedentop, Darryl. Developing teaching skills in physical education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Jacqueline. Dance composition: a practical guide for teachers. London: Lepus Books, 1976.Google Scholar