Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:30:26.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Exercise in Applied Personal Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Drid Williams
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper represents an attempt to raise three points with regard to the study of dance and social anthropology. First, I have stressed the importance of an anthropological perspective in contrast to other perspectives in connection with ethnographies of dance. Second, I have briefly outlined a few ontological and epistemological implications of treating social anthropology itself as a language-based, rather than as a Behavioural science. Third, I have only barely indicated the epistemological consequences involved in accepting the idea of a personal anthropology.

In fact, it is the latter point which suffers most from the following brief treatment, for while the subject matter for a deeper analysis is present in this essay (i.e. the parts of texts of articles written before I read anthropology), it has mainly been subjected to a fairly standard anthropological critique. There are those who might say that this could have been done without the benefit of the idea of a personal anthropology.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Fall/Winter 1976 , pp. 16 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ardener, E. et al. 1971 Introductory Essay. ASA 10: Social Anthropology and Language, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Ardener, E. et al. 1973 Some Outstanding Problems in the Analysis of Events. Paper for the Decennial Conference of the ASA, Oxford, July.Google Scholar
Ardener, E. et al. 1975 The Voice of Prophecy: further problems in the analysis of events. The Munro Lecture, Edinburg University, 24 April.Google Scholar
Crick, M. 1976 Explorations in Language and Meaning. Towards a Semantic Anthropology, (in press) Malaby, London.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. 1966 The Silent Language. Doubleday and Co. Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
Harre, R. 1970 Principles of Scientific Thinking. MacMillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harre, R. 1971 The Shift to an Anthropomorphic Model of Man. The Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, (JASO), 2,1, Hilary Term.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. 1958 Physics and Philosophy. Unwin University Books, London.Google Scholar
Pocock, D. 1973 The Idea of a Personal Anthropology. Paper for the Decennial Conference.Google Scholar
Pocock, D. 1975 Understanding Social Anthropology. Hodder and Stoughton, London.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de 1966 Course in General Linguistics (eds: Bally, Sechehaye and Reidlinger, Trans: Baskin) McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. 1953 The Philosophy of Science. Hutchinson and Co., London.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. 1961 Foresight and Understanding. Hutchinson and Co., London.Google Scholar
Williams, D. see footnote No. 3)Google Scholar
Winch, P. 1958 The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar