No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
This article presents a historical examination of employment amongst men aged 60 years or more in Spain. We aim to explore the characteristics of this segment of the labour force and to analyse the key transformations affecting it during the first seven decades of the twentieth century, such as structural change and, most notably, the rise of public pensions. We then move on to identify specific problems faced by older workers during the study period. It has been hypothesised that one of these was the ‘life-cycle deskilling process’, the effects of which have previously been demonstrated in case studies of certain nations other than Spain. We explore whether life-cycle deskilling also occurred in Spain. We take a quantitative perspective, basing our analysis on the age by occupation tables published from the Spanish censuses from 1900 to 1970.
Cet article présente une étude historique de l'emploi chez les hommes âgés de 60 ans et plus en Espagne. Il explore ce qui caractérise ce segment de la population active et analyse les transformations clés qui l'ont affecté pendant les sept premières décennies du XXe siècle. Parmi les changements structurels, on note tout particulièrement l'augmentation du nombre des pensions versées par les services publics. Nous nous attachons ensuite à identifier les problèmes spécifiques rencontrés par les travailleurs âgés au cours de la période étudiée. Des historiens ont émis l'hypothèse qu'entre autres problèmes, un processus de «déqualification au long du cours de la vie» était intervenu, dont les effets avaient déjà été montrés pour des pays autres que l'Espagne. Nous recherchons donc si une déqualification de ce type a également eu lieu en Espagne. Notre point de vue est quantitatif. Notre analyse repose sur les tableaux par âges et professions publiés à partir des recensements espagnols de 1900 à 1970.
Dieser Beitrag liefert eine historische Untersuchung der Beschäftigung unter Männern in Spanien im Alter von 60 Jahren und darüber. Unser Ziel besteht darin, die Charakteristika dieses Segments der Erwerbsbevölkerung zu erkunden und die wesentlichen Veränderungen zu analysieren, denen es in den ersten sieben Jahrzehnten des 20. Jahrhunderts ausgesetzt war, etwa dem Strukturwandel der Beschäftigung und, vor allem, dem Anstieg der öffentlichen Rentenversicherung. Anschließend identifizieren wir die spezifischen Probleme, denen ältere Arbeiter im Untersuchungszeitraum ausgesetzt waren. Einer Hypothese zufolge zählt dazu ein „lebenszyklischer Dequalifizierungsprozess“, dessen Auswirkungen in Fallstudien für andere Länder als Spanien bereits beschrieben worden sind. Wir untersuchen, ob es lebenszyklische Dequalifizierung auch in Spanien gab, und wählen dafür eine quantitative Perspektive, wobei unsere Analyse auf den altersspezifischen Berufstabellen in den spanischen Volkszählungen von 1900 bis 1970 beruht.
1 Costa, Dora L., The evolution of retirement: an American economic history, 1880–1990 (Chicago, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Costa, Dora L., Health, income and retirement: evidence from nineteenth century America, National Bureau of Economic Research [hereafter NBER] working paper no. 4537 (Cambridge, MA, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Grell, Ole Peter and Cunningham, Andrew, ‘General themes: health care and poor relief in 18th and 19th century Northern Europe’, in Grell, Ole Peter, Cunningham, Andrew and Jütte, Robert eds., Health care and poor relief in 18th and 19th century Northern Europe (Aldershot, 2002), 3–14Google Scholar; Soto, Pedro Carasa, ‘Welfare provision in Castile and Madrid’, in Grell, Ole Peter, Cunningham, Andrew and Roeck, Bernd eds., Health care and poor relief in 18th and 19th century Southern Europe (Aldershot, 2005), 96–120Google Scholar.
3 van der Linden, Marcel ed., Social security mutualism. The comparative history of mutual benefit societies (Bern, 1996)Google Scholar; Weinbren, Daniel, ‘Supporting self-help, charity, mutuality and reciprocity in nineteenth-century Britain’, in Harris, Bernard and Bridgen, Paul eds., Charity and mutual aid in Europe and North America since 1800 (New York, 2007), 67–88Google Scholar.
4 Rodríguez, Margarita Vilar, ‘La cobertura social a través de los socorros mutuos obreros, 1839–1935. ¿Una alternativa al Estado para afrontar los fallos del mercado?’, in Pons, Jerònia and Silvestre, Javier eds., Los orígenes del Estado del Bienestar en España, 1900–1945: los seguros de accidentes, vejez, desempleo y enfermedad (Zaragoza, 2010)Google Scholar, 88.
5 Gorsky, Martin, ‘The growth and distribution of English friendly societies in the early nineteenth century’, Economic History Review 51, 3 (1998), 489–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, Dot, ‘Self-help in nineteenth-century Wales: the rise and fall of the female friendly society’, Llafur. Journal of Welsh Labour History 4, 1 (1984), 14–26Google Scholar.
6 Roigé, Xavier, ‘De la Restauración al franquismo. Modelos y prácticas familiares’, in Chacón, Francisco and Bestard, Joan eds., Familias. Historia de la sociedad española del final de la Edad Media a nuestros días (Madrid, 2011), 667–742Google Scholar.
7 Johnson, Paul, ‘The employment and retirement of older men in England and Wales, 1881–1981’, Economic History Review 47, 1 (1994), 106–28Google Scholar.
8 Most notably, Ransom, Richard and Sutch, Robert L., ‘The labor of older Americans: retirement of men on and off the job, 1870–1937’, Journal of Economic History 46, 1 (1986), 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ransom, Richard and Sutch, Robert L., ‘The decline of retirement and the rise of efficiency wages: U.S. retirement patterns, 1870–1940’, in Ricardo-Campbell, Rita and Lazear, Edward eds., Issues in contemporary retirement (Stanford, 1988), 3–37Google Scholar; and Johnson, ‘Employment and retirement’, 106–28. Also Carter, Susan B. and Sutch, Richard C., ‘Myth of the industrial scrap heap: a revisionist view of turn-of-the-century American retirement’, Journal of Economic History 56 (1996), 5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woolard, Matthew, ‘The employment and retirement of older men, 1851–1881: further evidence from the census’, Continuity and Change 17, 3 (2002), 437–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lee, Chulhee, ‘Sectoral shift and the labor-force participation of older males in the United States, 1880–1940’, Journal of Economic History 62, 2 (2002), 512–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lee, Chulhee, Labour market status of older males in the United States, 1880–1940, NBER working paper no. 9550 (Cambridge, MA, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Alexander Elu Terán, ‘Las pensiones públicas de vejez en España, 1908–1936’, in Pons and Silvestre, Los orígenes del Estado del Bienestar, 151–82.
10 For a critical analysis of Spanish census data, see Nicolau, Roser, ‘Población, salud y actividad’, in Carreras, Albert and Tafunell, Xavier eds., Estadísticas históricas de España: siglos XIX–XX (Madrid, 2005), 77–154Google Scholar; Camps, Enriqueta, ‘Las transformaciones del mercado de trabajo en Cataluña, 1850–1925: migraciones, ciclos de vida y economías familiares’, Revista de Historia Industrial 11 (1997), 45–71Google Scholar; and especially on the underestimation of women's participation in the workforce: Sarasúa, Carmen, ‘El análisis histórico del trabajo agrario: cuestiones recientes’, Historia Agraria 22, December (2000), 79–96Google Scholar. Hatton, Timothy J. and Bailey, Roy E., ‘Women's work in census and survey, 1911–1931’, Economic History Review 54, 1 (2001), 88–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed also provide a detailed review of the evolution of the underestimation of female employment from the mid-nineteenth century until the 1980s in Britain.
11 Humphries, Jane and Sarasúa, Carmen, ‘Off the record: reconstructing women's labour force participation in the European past’, Feminist Economics 18, 4 (2012), 39–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Atkinson, Paul, ‘“Isn't it time you were finishing?”: women's labor force participation and childbearing in England, 1860–1920’, Feminist Economics 18, 4 (2012), 145–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Garrett, Eilidh, ‘The dawning of a new era? Women's work in England and Wales at the turn of the twentieth century’, in Goose, Nigel ed., Women's work in industrial England: regional and local perspectives (Hatfield, 2007), 314–22Google Scholar.
12 Addabbo, Tindara, Arrizabalaga, Marie-Pierre, Borderías, Cristina and Owens, Alastair, ‘Introduction: households, gender and the production of well-being’, in Addabbo, Tindara, Arrizabalaga, Marie-Pierre, Borderías, Cristina and Owens, Alastair eds., Gender inequalities, households and the production of well-being in modern Europe (Farnham, 2010), 3–24Google Scholar.
13 Johnson, ‘Employment and retirement’, 109 argues that this happened in England until 1901. For the USA, the criterion remained until 1940; Ransom, Richard and Sutch, Robert L., The trend in the rate of labor force participation of older men, 1870–1930: a review of the evidence, NBER working paper no. 3 (Cambridge, MA, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 1.
14 Azpilicueta, Pilar Erdozain and Mikelarena, Fernando, ‘Las cifras de activos agrarios en los censos de población españoles del período 1877–1991. Un análisis crítico’, Boletín de la Asociación de Demografía Histórica 17, 1 (1999), 89–113Google Scholar.
15 The three age groups used are ‘under 21 years’, ‘from 21 to 60 years’ and ‘over 60 years’.
16 There are concerns about the reliability of the 1940 census, due to the special circumstances in which it was produced immediately after the end of the Civil War.
17 The alternative would have involved sacrificing the 10-year aggregation in the matrix to transform age groups into 20-year-wide intervals. Apart from wasting the richness of later censuses, this solution would have greatly complicated the format of the table.
18 The 1950 census presents figures for 10-year age groups, so the number of workers above 60 years could not be calculated by indirect estimation.
19 Morena, Juan Ignacio Palacio ed., La reforma social en España. En el centenario del Instituto de Reformas Sociales (Madrid, 2004)Google Scholar; Morena, Juan Ignacio Palacio, La institucionalización de la reforma social en España, 1883–1924. La Comisión y el Instituto de Reformas Sociales (Madrid, 1988)Google Scholar; Calle, M. Dolores de la, La Comisión de Reformas Sociales 1883–1903. Política social y conflicto de intereses en la España de la Restauración (Madrid, 1989)Google Scholar.
20 Elu Terán, ‘Las pensiones’.
21 Valencia, Federico López, La acción patronal en el problema de los retiros obreros (Madrid, 1913)Google Scholar, 14. Social Catholics constituted a powerful line of social thought among Spanish conservatives. Their influence was especially felt after the encyclical Rerum Novarum was issued in 1891, prompting the emergence of a conservative doctrine of social policy intervention.
22 Stein, Oswald, Funciones y organización del seguro social (Madrid, 1933 [1908]), 5–6Google Scholar. This concept is equivalent to the ‘cost of depreciation’ mentioned in Aznar, Severino, ‘Curso para funcionarios del Instituto Nacional de Previsión. El retiro obrero obligatorio’, Anales del INP 27, 125 (1935), 705Google Scholar.
23 Stein, Funciones, 4.
24 The author's own translation from Francisco Moragas y Barret, Ideología de la Caja de Pensiones para la Vejez y de Ahorros (Barcelona, 1963 [1912]), 26–7. The quote is from the latter's speech: ‘Hierarchy of social insurance institutions’, given in Barcelona on 28 January 1912.
25 Instituto Nacional de Previsión (hereafter INP), ‘Conferencia de seguros sociales. Seguro de vejez. Notas explicativas de las conclusiones’ Anales del INP 9, 34 (1917), 281Google Scholar.
26 Rey, Fernando del, Propietarios y patronos. La política de las organizaciones económicas en la España de la Restauración, 1914–1923 (Madrid, 1992)Google Scholar, 398; Bustillo, Josefina Cuesta, Hacia los seguros sociales obligatorios. La crisis de la Restauración (Madrid, 1988), 189–200Google Scholar.
27 INP, La incorporación de los obreros del campo al régimen obligatorio del retiro obrero. Asamblea de Burgos, 23 de junio de 1923 (Madrid, 1924), 7–8.
28 Molinero, Carme, La captación de las masas. Política social y propaganda en el régimen franquista (Madrid, 2005)Google Scholar and ‘La política social del régimen franquista. Una asignatura pendiente de la historiografía’, Ayer 50 (2003), 319–31Google Scholar.
29 Richart, Baldomero Cerdá y, Teoría general de la previsión y sus formas (Barcelona, 1945)Google Scholar.
30 Labour Charter of 9 March 1938, X, 2.
31 Maestro, Manuel, Los seguros sociales en España (Madrid, 1944)Google Scholar, 84. ‘Production’ here is a literal translation; a perfect example of the regime's use of language, in that ‘capital’ and ‘labour’ were terms to be avoided.
32 Eguilaz, Higinio Paris, Estudio actuarial y social de los Seguros obligatorios vigentes en España (Madrid, 1935)Google Scholar.
33 Jerònia Pons, ‘Los inicios del seguro de enfermedad en España, 1923–1945’, in Pons and Silvestre, Los orígenes del Estado del Bienestar, 217–46; Rodríguez, Ana M. Guillén, La construcción política del sistema sanitario español: de la postguerra a la democracia (Madrid, 2000)Google Scholar; Molinero, La captación de las masas; Arturo Álvarez Rosete, ‘Social welfare policies in non-democratic regimes: the development of social insurance schemes in Franco's Spain 1936–1950’ (unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Nottingham, 2003).
34 Margarita Vilar Rodríguez, ‘El sistema de cobertura social en la inmediata posguerra civil (1939–1958): una pieza más de la estrategia represiva franquista’, in VI Encuentro de investigadores sobre el franquismo (Zaragoza, 2006), 619–34.
35 Rodríguez, Margarita Vilar, ‘La distribución funcional de la renta en España entre 1914 y 1959: una propuesta de análisis’, Investigaciones de Historia Económica 6 (2006), 105–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
36 Carmona, Álvaro Soto, ‘Rupturas y continuidades en las relaciones laborales del primer franquismo, 1938–1958’, in Barciela, Carlos ed., Autarquía y mercado negro. El fracaso económico del primer franquismo, 1939–1959 (Barcelona, 2003), 217–45Google Scholar.
37 Palacio, Manuel Laraña and Caro, Manuel Selma, Mutualidades y Montepíos laborales (Barcelona, 1950)Google Scholar; Gil, José Luis Meilán, El Mutualismo Laboral. Un estudio jurídico (Madrid, 1963)Google Scholar.
38 Leñero, José Pérez, ‘¿Qué son los montepíos laborales?’, Revista de Trabajo 11 (1950), 906Google Scholar.
39 Molina, Juan Antonio Maldonado, Génesis y evolución de la protección social por vejez en España (Madrid, 2002)Google Scholar, 82.
40 Council of the INP Records, Memorándum sobre proyecto de Ley de Bases (Madrid, 1963)Google Scholar.
41 Rodríguez, Margarita Vilar, ‘Estrategias de supervivencia de las familias trabajadoras en el marco laboral hostil de la posguerra civil española (1939–1958)’, Sociología del Trabajo 56 (2006), 119–63Google Scholar.
42 Sarasúa, Carmen and Molinero, Carme, ‘Trabajo y niveles de vida en el Franquismo. Un estado de la cuestión desde una perspectiva de género’, in Borderías, Cristina ed., La historia de las mujeres: perspectivas actuales (Barcelona, 2009), 309–54Google Scholar.
43 In 1900, agriculture and farming employed 63.29 per cent of the male working population. In 1910, the equivalent figure was 59.79 per cent; in 1920, 62.07 per cent; 1930, 49.99 per cent; 1940, 54.82 per cent; 1950, 51.95 per cent; and 1970, 26.53 per cent.
44 Lee, ‘Sectoral shift’, 512 shows that subjective retirement rates, measured by the retirement hazard rate, in agriculture were lower than in the other sectors of the USA's economy between 1880 and 1940.
45 Given that the 1970 census has no data for certain classifications recorded in the previous censuses, the following criteria have been adopted when aggregating the occupations: ‘alcohol, wine and tobacco’ are added to ‘food industries’; the ‘fur’, ‘dress’ and ‘shoe’ industries are placed with ‘textiles’; ‘storage’ is classified with ‘transport’; while ‘professionals’, ‘the clergy’, ‘the army’ and ‘labourers’ all go in ‘other occupations’.
46 Pat Thane, ‘Ageing, pensions and retirement in Britain since the late 19th century’, paper presented at the XIV International Economic History Congress (IEHC) (Helsinki, 2006); Clark, Robert L. and Spengler, Joseph J., The economics of individual and population aging (New York, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
47 Lee, Chulhee, Technological changes and employment of older manufacturing workers in early twentieth century America, NBER working paper no. 14746 (Cambridge, MA, 2009), 21–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Margo, Robert A., ‘The labour force participation of older Americans in 1900: further results’, Explorations in Economic History 30 (1993), 409–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
48 With the census as our source we are, in fact, only able to identify ‘horizontal’ or ‘across-sector’ segmentation. Vertical segmentation, where older workers would occupy lower-status, lower-paid jobs within the same occupational sector, is equally plausible.
49 See Costa, The evolution of retirement, 24, on the effect of high-school education since the 1920s. On technological change, see Jacobs, Klaus, Kohli, Martin and Rein, Martin, ‘Testing the industry-mix hypothesis of early exit’, in Kohli, Martin, Guillemard, Anne-Marie and Van Gunsteren, Herman eds., Time for retirement. Comparative studies of early exit from the labor force (Cambridge, 1991)Google Scholar, 68. On the costs of requalification, see Martin Kohli and Martin Rein, ‘The changing balance of work and retirement’, in Kohli, Guillemard and Van Gunsteren, Time for retirement, 16. Discussing the same issue Collis, Clive, Mallier, Tony and Smith-Canham, James, ‘The role of local initiatives in tackling the exclusion of older workers from the labour market in Britain’, Ageing International 25, 3 (1999), 47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar highlight the lower participation of older workers in training programmes leading to qualifications.
50 Ransom and Sutch, ‘Labor of older Americans’, 19.
51 Johnson, Paul and Zimmermann, Klaus F., Labour markets in an ageing Europe (Cambridge, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 56.
52 Wise, David A., ‘Firm pension policy and early retirement’, in Atkinson, A. B. and Rein, Martin eds., Age, work and social security (New York, 1993), 51–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
53 The classification used in Johnson, ‘Employment and retirement’, 118, was followed as closely as possible.
54 For evidence on sectoral wages in Spain for 1910 and 1930, see Lina Gálvez Muñoz and Joan R. Rosés, ‘The determinants of the gender wage gap in Spain, 1900–1930: supply and demand forces’, paper presented at II Iberometrics (Sigüenza, 2005), appendix.
55 Victor, Christina R., Old age in modern society: a textbook of social gerontology (Beckenham, Kent, 1987)Google Scholar, 162. In the Spanish case, the same type of evidence is found on the persistence of older workers in some of the most prestigious sectors by Ortiz, Lourdes Pérez, ‘La ocupabilidad de los mayores y los programas de jubilación flexible’, Papeles de Economía Española 104 (2005), 239–52Google Scholar. We suspect that the pattern of concentration in some of these sectors may have been less strong had workers aged 65 years and over been considered, as one might expect a withdrawal of individuals in this category from the workforce due to the higher incidence of requirements for formal or legal retirement in the high-status occupations than found in agriculture or domestic service. However, it is also possible that the incidence of self-employment in some of the higher-status occupations was significant, and this may have favoured higher rates of continued participation in the labour market.
56 This result is in line with the conclusions reached for the USA in Goldin, Claudia and Katz, Lawrence F., The race between education and technology (Cambridge, MA, 2008)Google Scholar, 94.
57 Camps, ‘Las transformaciones’, 61. Regarding the need for artisan or craft knowledge, we can point to the over-representation of older workers in the wood and furniture sector (Table 5; sector 11) in support of this argument.
58 To calculate the Spearman correlation a number corresponding to the ranking of that observation, once all observations have been placed in order from highest to lowest, is assigned to each observation. The statistic in each sample is obtained via the formula ρ = 1 – (6ΣD2)/[N(N 2 – 1)], where D is the difference in absolute terms between the rank of each pair of observations.
59 As there are no data available for 1960, 1950 and 1970 were paired.
60 There are actually 27 observations between 1930 and 1940. As this n has no tabulated critical value, n = 26 was taken as the closest approximation. In all cases, statistics correspond to one-tailed tests.
61 Barciela, Carlos, ‘Intervencionismo y crecimiento agrario en España, 1936–1971’, in Martín-Aceña, Pablo and de la Escosura, Leandro Prados eds., La nueva historia económica de España (Madrid, 1985), 285–316Google Scholar; Carlos Barciela and M. Inmaculada López Ortiz, ‘El fracaso de la política agraria del primer franquismo, 1939–1959. Veinte años perdidos para la agricultura española’, in Barciela, Autarquía y mercado negro, 55–94.
62 Johnson, ‘Employment and retirement’, 119–20.
63 Supplement to the 65th Annual Report of the Registrar General, part II (P.P. 1905, XVIII); Registrar General's Decennial Supplement, England and Wales 1921, part II: occupational mortality (1921); Registrar General's Decennial Supplement, England and Wales 1931, part IIa: occupational mortality (1938).
64 Haines, Michael R., ‘Conditions of work and the decline of mortality’, in Schofield, Roger, Reher, David S. and Bideau, Alain eds., The decline of mortality in Europe (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar, 181. On the urban penalty, which made urban growth impossible without in-migration, see Wrigley, E. A., Davies, R. S., Oeppen, J. E. and Schofield, R. S., English population history from family reconstitution, 1580–1837 (Cambridge, 1997), 201–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
65 Reher, David S., ‘Mortalidad rural y mortalidad urbana: un paseo por la transición demográfica en España’, in Dopico, Fausto and Reher, David S. eds., El declive de la mortalidad en España 1860–1930 (Huesca, 1998), 66–7Google Scholar.
66 Reher, ‘Mortalidad’, 80.
67 Haines, ‘Conditions of work’, 179. This pattern might explain the puzzle attached to the professional classes elaborated on by Uselding and examined for the USA by Ransom and Sutch, ‘Labor of older Americans’, who state on p. 26: ‘Uselding's finding that industrial jobs were ‘healthier’ than other occupations is more likely the result of downward occupational mobility and early retirement than evidence that industrial safety standards were high.’