Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2009
1 For earlier accounts on the theory and practice of family discipline and governance see Laslett, P., The world we have lost (New York, 1965), 2–6Google Scholar; Schochet, G., ‘Patriarchalism, politics, and mass attitudes in Stuart England’, Historical Journal 12 (1969), 413–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morgan, E. S., The Puritan family (New York, 1966)Google Scholar; Hill, C., Society and puritanism in pre-revolutionary England (London, 1964)Google Scholar; Stone, L., The family, sex and marriage in England 1500–1800 (abridged edn., New York, 1979), 109–27.Google Scholar For the demographic and economic analysis see, Laslett, P., ‘Mean household size in England since the sixteenth century’, in Laslett, P. and Wall, R., eds., Household and family in past time (Cambridge, 1972), 125–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laslett, P., ‘Characteristics of the Western family considered over time’, in Family life and illicit love in earlier generations (Cambridge, 1977), 12–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kussmaul, A., Servants in husbandry in early modern England (Cambridge, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hajnal, J., ‘Two kinds of pre-industrial household formation system’, in Wall, R., Robin, J. and Laslett, P., eds., Family forms in historic Europe (Cambridge, 1983), 65–104Google Scholar; Wall, R., ‘Leaving home and the process of household formation in pre-industrial England’, Continuity and Change, 1(2) (1987), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Thomas, K., ‘Age and authority in early modern England’, in Proceedings of the British Academy, 1976 (London, 1977), 62, 214–18Google Scholar; Laslett, P., Family life and illicit love, 4Google Scholar; Brigden, S., ‘Youth and the English Reformation’, Past and Present 95 (1982), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Macfarlane, A., The family life of Ralph Josselin (Cambridge, 1970), 111Google Scholar; Wrightson, K., English Society 1580–1680 (London, 1982), 74.Google ScholarKussmaul, A. observed that the status of a servant as both family and a hired worker was ‘fraught with ambiguities’; Servants in husbandry, 69, 31–34.Google Scholar
4 ‘You know that the first government that ever was in the world was in the Family; and the first disorder that ever fell out since spring from Families.’ Abbot, Robert, A Christian Family Builded by God, Directing all Governors of Families How to Act (1653), A4.Google Scholar For a statement on the duties of a servant see, for example, Chamberlayne, Edward, Anglia Notitia (London, 1669), 2nd edition, 461–2.Google Scholar For a summary of seventeenth-century ideas on the role of the patriarchal family in maintaining the social order see Underdown, D., Revel, riot, and rebellion. Popular politics and culture in England 1603–1660 (Oxford, 1985), 9–11.Google Scholar For the characteristics of youth see The Office of Christian Parents (Cambridge, 1616), 135Google Scholar; Thomas, K., ‘Age and authority’, 207–08.Google Scholar For the literary tradition on the ages of man and the characteristics of youth see Burrow, J. A., The ages of man. A study in medieval writings and thought (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
5 Thomas, , ‘Age and authority’, 217–18Google Scholar; Burrow, , The ages of man, 162–89Google Scholar; Brigden, S., ‘Youth and the Reformation’, 50–51.Google Scholar
6 Relief of apprentices wronged by their masters (1687), 8.Google Scholar
7 For an anthropological perspective on the differences between adoption and fostering (apprenticeship) see Goody, E. N., Parenthood and social reproduction. Fostering and occupational roles in West Africa (Cambridge, 1982), 23–34.Google Scholar
8 Quoted and discussed in Smith, S. R., ‘The ideal and reality: apprentice-master relationships in seventeenth-century London’, History of Education Quarterly 21 (1981), 451–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Bristol Record Office (hereafter B.R.O.) Register of Apprentices, 1620–1636, 04352(5)a, fo. 133Google Scholar; Quarter Sessions, 04445, fo. 141, 04447(1), fos. 1 22, 40, 04434(1) fo. 476Google Scholar. In 29 petitions brought by apprentices against their masters 13 were presented by the apprentice and 16 were presented ‘by and on behalf of the apprentice; most probably by parents or relatives. Quarter Sessions, 04445–04447(2), 04434(1).
10 Smith, Thomas (ed. Aston, L.), De Republica Anglorum (1565), (Cambridge, 1906), 137–39.Google Scholar
11 Laslett, P., ‘Mean household size’Google Scholar; Hajnal, , ‘Two kinds of pre-industrial household…’, 67Google Scholar; Wall, R., ‘The household: demographic and economic change in England, 1650–1670’, in Wall, , Robin, and Laslett, eds., Family forms 493Google Scholar; Cobbet, Thomas, A Fruitfull and Usefull Discourse Touching the Honour due from Children to Parents, (London, 1656), 33.Google Scholar
12 Fortes, M., ‘The developmental cycle in domestic groups’, in Goody, J., ed., Kinship (Middlesex, 1971), 97–8.Google Scholar
13 Trenchfield, Caleb, A Cap of Gray Hairs for a Green Head, Or, the Fathers Counsel to his Son, an Apprentice in London (London, 1688), 26Google Scholar; Crouch, Nathaniel, The Apprentices Companion (London, 1681), Introduction.Google Scholar
14 The office of Christian Parents, 142Google Scholar; Cuffe, Henry, The Differences of the Ages of Mans Life (London, 1633), 121.Google Scholar
15 Chamberlayne, E., Anglia Notitia, 458.Google Scholar By the time Chamberlayne wrote, in the 1660s, some of these rights, i.e. the rights to choose a guardian or to claim land held in socage, had been eroded in legal practice, or altogether abolished by law. See Thomas, , ‘Age and Authority’, 221–23.Google Scholar
16 ‘[Young men's] lives are regulated more by moral feelings than by reasoning; and whereas reasoning leads us to choose what is useful, moral goodness leads us to choose what is noble.’ Aristotle, Rhetoric, Bk. II, chaps. 12–14Google Scholar, cited in Burrow, , The ages of man, 192.Google Scholar
17 Of the 32 autobiographies and journals used, 26 were of craftsmen and traders who had been apprentices in their youth; the remainder (6) were of men who entered the university, the law, or a military profession. Data on Bristol apprentices consists of a sample of apprentices bound in the town in the first half of the seventeenth century, and of apprentice cases, a total of 124 petitions, presented in Quarter Sessions throughout the century. For further discussion of the data see Ben-Amos, I. Krausman, Apprenticeship, the family and urban society in early modern England (Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Stanford University, 1985), 25–6.Google Scholar
18 For premiums in London's greater companies see Grassby, R., ‘Social mobility and business enterprise in seventeenth-century England’, in Pennington, D. and Thomas, K., eds., Puritans and revolutionaries: essays in seventeenth-century history presented to Christopher Hill (Oxford, 1978), 364–65.Google Scholar Evidence on premiums paid for apprenticeship in a town such as Bristol shows a range of 1/4 s paid to a buttonmaker, to 70 pounds paid to a mercer. In 39 cases indicating premiums 31 (79.5%) were between 2–14 pounds. BRO, 04445–04447(2); 04352(2)–(6). For the exemption from legal qualifications in some towns, and the conflict between local authorities interested in maintaining the viability of urban economies and the central government, keen to maintain a labour force for agriculture, see Woodward, D., ‘The background to the Statute of Artificers: the genesis of labour policy, 1558–63’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, 33 (1980), 32–44, esp. 42–3.Google Scholar
19 Fretwell, James, ‘A family history journal’ in Yorkshire diaries and autobiographies in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (Durham, 1877), 184–87Google Scholar; Marshall, J. D., ed., The autobiography of William Stout of Lancaster (1665–1752) (Chetham Society, Manchester, 1967), 72Google Scholar; Lubbock, B. ed., Barlow's journal (London, 1934), 15.Google Scholar
20 Wall, R., ‘The age at leaving home’, Journal of Family History 2 (1978), 191Google Scholar; Kussmaul, , Servants in husbandry 70–2Google Scholar; Laslett, , ‘Characteristics of the Western Family’, 34.Google Scholar In 26 autobiographies indicating ages of departure from home for apprenticeship, 22 were between 13–18, the remaining 4 were at the ages of 9, 11, 19, and 20. In London, however, young men entering apprenticeship in the large companies were in their late teens. Rappaport, S., ‘Social structure and mobility in sixteenth-century London: Part I’, The London Journal 9 (1983), 115–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 In some accounts of the divisions of life, youth fell under the age category of 14–28, in others between the ages of 9–18, or 9–25. The Office of Christian Parents. 135Google Scholar; The Differences of the Ages…, 118.Google Scholar
22 Bangs, Benjamin, Memoirs of the Life and Convincement of Benjamin Bangs (London, 1757), A4.Google ScholarEdmundson, William, A Journal of the Life, Travels, Sufferings and Labour… (Dublin, 1820), 41Google Scholar; Will of Mercer, William (1612), B.R.O., Great Orphan Book (3), fo 104Google Scholar; Temple Parish, Churchwardens Accounts, Ca13(2)II 2/5/1627.
23 Kussmaul, , Servants in husbandry, 71–2.Google Scholar
24 Oxley, Joseph, Joseph's Offering to his Children Being Joseph Oxley's Journal, in Barclay, J. ed., A Select Series…of the Early Members of the Society of Friends (London, 1837), 5, 207.Google Scholar
25 B.R.O. 04378(2), fo. 38; 04417(1), fo. 85.Google Scholar
26 Fretwell, , A family history, 187–88Google Scholar; Coxere, Edward, Meyerstein, E. H. W. ed., Adventures by sea (New York, 1946), 4–5Google Scholar; Brink, A. W. ed., Life of the Rev. Mr. George Trosse (Montreal and London, 1974), 48–9.Google Scholar
27 For example, in a sample of 1,512 apprentices in Bristol between 1600–1645, 88 (5.8%)were sons of gentlemen, 193 (12.8%) of yeomen, 40 (2.7%) of merchants, 210 (13.9%) of traders, 48 (3.2%) of professionals, 634 (41.9%) of craftsmen, 285 (18.8%) of husbandmen, and 14 (0.9%) were sons of labourers.
28 Vries, Jan de. European urbanization 1500–1800 (London, 1984), 221–2.Google Scholar
29 While many sons of husbandmen were among urban apprentices, sons of craftsmen and traders could be bound servants in agriculture. Kussmaul, , Servants in husbandry, 77–8.Google Scholar
30 Kussmaul, , Servants in husbandry, 58–59, 64–65.Google Scholar
31 Gardiner, D., ed., The Oxinden Letters 1607–1642 (London, 1933), 39–42Google Scholar; Brink, , ed., Life of…George Trosse, 57Google Scholar; Croker, , Brief Memoir of the Life of…, in Barclay ed., A Select Series…, 6, 301–02.Google Scholar
32 A Letter of John Woodhouse to his cousin, cited in Fretwell, A family history, 206Google Scholar. In a sample of 1,945 apprenticeship indentures recorded in Bristol between 1600–1645, 119 (6.1%) included bonds of security; of the 119, 74 (62.2%) were in the distributive trades, the rest in a variety of crafts and industrial occupations.Google Scholar
33 Calculations based on a sample of 1,512 apprenticeships in which parental occupation was recorded. B.R.O., 04352 (2)–(6).
34 Patten, J., ‘Patterns of migration and movement of labour to three pre-industrial East-Anglian towns’, Journal of Historical Geography 2 (1976), 128–9, 132–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Palliser, D. M., Tudor York, (Oxford, 1979), 128–9Google Scholar; Ben-Amos, , Apprenticeship, the family and urban society, 137–44.Google Scholar
35 For cases of apprentices who became ill during their service and were sent back to their parents or kin by an order of court, see B.R.O. 04434(1), fos. 532, 490Google Scholar; 04445, fo. 141Google Scholar; 04447(1), fos. 2, 22.Google Scholar
36 Lubbock, ed., Barlow's Journal, 16.Google Scholar The conclusion to a popular handbook for apprentices in the mercantile trades included a ‘historic very profitable and delightful for a youth to reade and meditate’, which told the story of a lion who died in his youth having neglected the ‘good counsell and instructions of [his] aged father.’ Browne, John, (McGrath, P., ed.) The Marchants Avizo (1589), (Harvard, 1957), 57–9.Google Scholar
37 Goodwick, A. T. S., ed., The Relation of Sydenham Poyntz 1624–1636 (Royal Historical Society, 1908), 45.Google Scholar
38 Disney, Gervase, Some Remarkable Passages in the Holy Life and Death of G.D. (London, 1692), 29Google Scholar; Croker, , Brief Memoir, 285.Google Scholar
39 Disney, , Some Remarkable Passages…, 29Google Scholar; Shaw, John, The Life of Master John Shaw, in Yorkshire Diaries and Autobiographies (Durham, 1877), 123.Google Scholar
40 Fretwell, , A Family History, 197–8.Google Scholar
41 Fretwell, , A Family History, 201Google Scholar; Coxere, , Adventures by sea, 6Google Scholar; Davies, Richard, An Account of the Convincement…of Richard Davies, (London, 1794), 2Google Scholar; Marshall, , The Autobiography of William Stout, 74Google Scholar; The Diary of John Cogge, Bodleian Library, MS. Eng. misc. f. 78, p. 65Google Scholar; Lubbock, , Barlow's Journal, 16.Google Scholar
42 Parkinson, R. ed., The Life of Adam Martindale (Chetham Society, old series, 4 1845), 24.Google Scholar
43 See section III.
44 Bangs, B, Memoirs of the Life…, 11.Google Scholar
45 Defoe, D., The Life and… of Robinson Crusoe, ed. Crowley, J. D. (Oxford, 1981), 3–8Google Scholar; Norwood, Richard, The Journal of Richard Norwood, (New York, 1945), 30–1Google Scholar; Lubbock, , Barlow's Journal, 19–20.Google Scholar
46 Ibid.; Coxere, Adventures by sea, 6.
47 Ben-Amos, , Apprenticeship, the family…, 229–30.Google Scholar
48 Bangs, , Memoirs of…, 12.Google Scholar
49 Lubbock, , Barlow's Journal, 27.Google Scholar
50 Trenchfield, , A Cap of Grey Hairs, 47.Google Scholar
51 Fretwell, , A family history, 197.Google Scholar
52 Kussmaul, , Servants in husbandry, 49–69.Google Scholar
53 Ibid. 32–3.
54 Tryon, Thomas, A New Method of Educating Children (London, 1695), 83Google Scholar; The Apprentices of London's Petition Presented to the Honourable Court of Parliament (1641); Relief of Apprentices Wronged by their Masters, 2Google Scholar; Rappaport, , ‘Social structure and mobility’, 117.Google Scholar
55 Of 92 petitions presented in Quarter Sessions in Bristol, 48 (52.2%) were petitions of masters complaining about their apprentices, 34 (47.8%) petitions were presented by apprentices.
56 B.R.O., 04447(1), fo. 39. On the whole, 6 (6.5%) of the 92 cases which were discharged by the court in Bristol were the result of the master's death.
57 B.R.O., 04445, 04447(1), 04447(2), passim. Of the 92 petitions presented at court, 9 (20.7%) were released on economic grounds or as a result of the master's departure from the town. For petitions stating the departure of a master, at times indicating his departure to the countryside or overseas, 04434(1), fos. 533, 532, 531, 527, 517, 465.
58 B.R.O., 04352(5)a, fo. 106; 04359(2)a, fo. 215.
59 In a sample of 99 apprentices who were discharged in Bristol between 1600–1645, only 46 were at the same time recorded as transferred to another master.
60 In the mid-sixteenth century between a fifth and a quarter of the number of young men admitted as apprentices were recorded as new freemen; in the 1610s the proportion of new freemen to the no. of apprentices annually registered was 23.6%, in the 1620s–16.5%; and in the 1630s–24.7%. B.R.O., 04352(l)–04352(5)b, 04358–04359(2) a–b.
61 In a sample of 99 apprentices who were discharged by the local court, 59 (59.6%) were discharged within the first two years of their term.
62 Kussmaul, , Servants in husbandry, 78–83.Google Scholar
63 In a sample of 136 apprentices bound in Bristol between 1600–1645, whose fathers were engaged in the distributive trades (merchants, draper, mercers), 35 (25.7%) entered one of the crafts (in textile, building, leather, metal, wood or transport occupations). Of 87 sons of gentlemen, 21 (24.1%) were likewise bound to one of the crafts.
64 Marshall, , The Autobiography of William Stout, 88–9.Google Scholar
65 Bangs, , Memoirs of…, 13–23Google Scholar; Oxley, , Joseph's Offering, 209–21.Google Scholar
66 Sachse, W. L., ed., The Diary of Roger Lowe of Ashton-in-Makerfield, Lancashire (New Haven, 1938), 93.Google Scholar
67 Thomas, , ‘Age and authority’, 223.Google Scholar
68 Ingram, M., ‘Spousals litigation in the English Ecclesiastical Courts c1350–c1650’, in Outhwaite, R. B., ed., Marriage and society. Studies in the social history of marriage (London, 1981), 35–57, esp. 48–50Google Scholar; Wrightson, K., English society, 70–88Google Scholar; Houlbrook, R., ‘The making of marriage in mid-tudor England: evidence from the records of matrimonial contract litigation’, Journal of Family History, 10 (1985), 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar