Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:50:20.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clapham revisited: the decline of the Norwich worsted industry (c. 1700–1820)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

Keith Sugden
Keith Sugden*
Affiliation:
Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure, University of Cambridge
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study utilises several sources of male occupational data to track the decline of the Norwich worsted industry, c. 1700–1820. The data show that the industry began to fall away during the second half of the eighteenth century, if not sooner, and earlier than has been previously realised. The transfer of the industry to the north of England began before the introduction of steam-powered spinning or weaving. Market competition, notably from Lancashire printed fustians and cottons, and the loss of export trade through war, were the likely causal factors.

John clapham revisité: le déclin du lainage peigné à norwich (vers 1700–1820)

La présente étude repose sur les métiers masculins, relevé à travers diverses sources documentaires, qui permettent de suivre le déclin de l'industrie textile à Norwich, c. 1700–1820, alors spécialisée dans la laine peignée. Ces données montrent que cette manufacture a commencé à décliner au cours de la seconde moitié du dix-huitième siècle, sinon auparavant, c'est-à-dire plus tôt qu'on ne pensait jusque-là. Le transfert de cette production vers le nord de l'Angleterre a commencé avant l'introduction de toute machine à vapeur permettant de filer ou tisser mécaniquement. Les raisons en sont très probablement liées à l’évolution d'un marché devenu plus compétitif, avec notamment la présence des futaines et cotons imprimés du Lancashire, et d'autre part, avec la guerre, la cessation des exportations commerciales.

Clapham revisited: der niedergang des kammgarngewerbes in norwich (ca. 1700–1820)

Diese Studie verwendet Berufsdaten von Männern aus verschiedenen Quellen, um den Niedergang des Norwicher Kammgarngewerbes von etwa 1700 bis 1820 nachzuzeichnen. Die Daten zeigen, dass der Rückgang des Gewerbe in der zweiten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts (wenn nicht schon vorher) einsetzte, also früher als bislang angenommen. Die industrielle Verschiebung ins nördliche England begann vor der Einführung von Dampfmaschinen in der Spinnerei oder Weberei. Die Gründe dafür liegen im Wettbewerb, namentlich durch gedruckte Barchent- und Baumwollstoffe, und im kriegsbedingten Einbruch des Exporthandels.

Type
Research Article
Information
Continuity and Change , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , August 2018 , pp. 203 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Bowden, Peter J., The wool trade in Tudor and Stuart England (London, 1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ponting, K. G., Baines's account of the woollen manufacture of England (Newton Abbot, 1970)Google Scholar.

2 Broadberry, Stephen, Campbell, Bruce M. S., Klein, Alexander, Overton, Mark and van Leeuwen, Bas, British economic growth 1270–1870 (Cambridge, 2015), 144–7Google Scholar.

3 Stephen Broadberry, Bruce M. S. Campbell, Alexander Klein, Mark Overton and Bas van Leeuwen, ‘British economic growth 1270–1870’ (July 1010), 45, http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/sbroadberry/wp/pre1700v3.pdf [accessed August 2017]; Crafts, N. F. R., ‘British economic growth, 1700–1831: a review of the evidence’, Economic History Review 36, 2 (1983), 177–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Note, some serges woven with a worsted warp and wool weft and with a high wool content required fulling.

5 Gregory, D., Regional transformation and industrial revolution: a geography of the Yorkshire woollen industry (Basingstoke, 1982), 38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Watson, J., History and antiquities of the parish of Halifax in Yorkshire, facsimile edn (London, 1973), 65Google Scholar; James, J., History of the worsted manufacture in England (London, 1857), 201Google Scholar.

7 Priestley, Ursula, The fabric of stuffs: the Norwich textile industry from 1565 (Norwich, 1990), 13–14Google Scholar; Williamson, Fiona, Social relations and urban space: Norwich 1600–1700 (Woodbridge, 2014)Google Scholar, 17; Clapham, J. H., The woollen and worsted industries (London, 1907), 3Google Scholar.

8 Smail, John, Merchants, markets and manufacture: the English wool textile industry in the eighteenth century (Basingstoke, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 45; Kerridge, Eric, Textile manufactures in early modern England (Manchester, 1985), 42–59Google Scholar, 67–88.

9 Wilson, C., England's apprenticeship (London, 1965), 360–73Google Scholar, cited in Priestley, Ursula, ‘The marketing of norwich stuffs’, Textile History 22, 2 (1991), 193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here 199 and Corfield, Penelope, ‘A provincial capital in the late seventeenth century: the case of Norwich’, in Clark, Peter and Slack, Paul eds., Crisis and order in English towns, 1500–1700 (London, 1972), 263–310Google Scholar, here 281.

10 Corfield, ‘Provincial capital’, 281–2.

11 J. Smail, Merchants, 126; Priestley, Fabric, 21, 23; WYRO Misc. 588, West Yorkshire Archive, Calderdale Central Library, Halifax, ‘Samuel Hill pattern book’.

12 Morton, J., ‘The natural history of Northamptonshire’ (London, 1712)Google Scholar, cited in Randall, A., ‘The Kettering worsted industry of the eighteenth century, part 1: origins, products and organization of the industry’, Northampton Past and Present 4 (1970/71), 313–20Google Scholar; James, History, 195–6; Anonymous, A short essay upon trade (London, 1741), cited in James, History, 231; Defoe, Daniel, The complete English tradesman in familiar letters (London, 1726)Google Scholar, 393, 397, 401. Leicestershire was another county engaged in woolcombing and worsted manufacture, but the focus there was on knitted hosiery and not upon woven cloth.

13 11,364 Baptism registers in England and Wales, 1813–1820, record the occupations of 2,661,683 bridegrooms of whom 191,778 were employed in textile manufacture. Data available from Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure, University of Cambridge, ‘1813–20 PREnglandWalesOccs. mbd’, http://files-occs.geog.cam.ac.uk/ [accessed September 2014]; Sugden, Keith, ‘The location of the textile industry in England and Wales, 1813–20’, Textile History 47, 2 (2016), 208–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Clapham, J. H., ‘The transference of the worsted industry from Norfolk to the West Riding’, The Economic Journal 30, 78 (1910), 195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 197.

15 Wilson, Richard, ‘The textile industry’, in Rawcliffe, Carole and Wilson, Richard eds., Norwich since 1550 (London, 2004), 219–41Google Scholar, here 235.

16 Priestley, U. ed., The letters of Philip Stannard, Norwich textile manufacturer (1751–1763) (Cambridge, 1994), 5Google Scholar.

17 P. J. Corfield, ‘The size of the Norwich worsted industry in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’, a discussion paper at the SSRC/Pasold Research Fund conference (UEA, Norwich, 1975), 3, 9, cited in Wilson, ‘The textile industry’, 224.

18 Defoe, Daniel, A tour thro’ the whole island of Great Britain (London, 1724), 91–2Google Scholar; Lipson, E., The history of the woollen and worsted industries (London, 1931), 229Google Scholar.

19 Postlethwayt, M., The universal dictionary of trade and commerce (London, 1766)Google Scholar; Wrigley, E. A., ‘English county populations in the later eighteenth century’, Economic History Review 60, 1 (2007), 35–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Young, A., The farmer's tour through the East of England, vol ii (London, 1771), 74–82Google Scholar.

21 James, History, 285.

22 Ibid., 258–9.

23 François Duc de la Rochefoucald and Norman Scarfe, A Frenchman's year in Suffolk, 1784, repr. (Woodbridge, 2001), 223; The Letters of Maximilien de Lazowski (1784), cited in Scarfe, N. and Wilson, R., ‘Norwich's textile industry in 1784, observed by Maximilien de Lazowski: edited and translated by Norman Scarfe’, Textile History 23, 1 (1992), 113–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Beatniffe, R., The Norfolk tour, 2nd edn (Norwich, 1773), 5–6Google Scholar.

25 Beatniffe, R., The Norfolk tour, 6th edn (Norwich, 1808), 97Google Scholar.

26 W. Taylor, Monthly Magazine (1798), 415, cited in Edwards, J. K., ‘The decline of the Norwich textiles industry’, Yorkshire Bulletin of Economic and Social Research 16, 1 (1964), 31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Beatniffe estimated that 12,000 looms and 72,000 people were employed countywide in the 1770s: Beatniffe, The Norfolk tour, 2nd edn, 5–6.

28 Edwards, ‘Decline’.

29 Following Acts of Elizabeth I, 1598–1601 (39, Eliz., c.3, 39. Eliz., c.4, and 43, Eliz., c.2) parishes were obliged to provide relief to their poor, including those persons deemed physically unable to work, for example those lame, the old and the blind, but also those who were able-bodied but had no means of obtaining work. It has been estimated that by 1700 approximately 80 per cent of parishes were implementing a parish rate to cover the required expenditure. By the eighteenth century, urban centres including Norwich, had increasing expenditure on their casual poor. Williams, Samantha, Poverty, gender and life-cycle under the English poor law 1760–1834 (Woodbridge 2011), 1–3Google Scholar; Prichard, M. F. Lloyd, ‘The decline of Norwich’, Economic History Review 3, 3 (1951), 371–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Edwards, J. K., ‘Norwich bills of mortality, 1707–1830’, Bulletin of Economic Research 21, 2 (1969), 94–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Daunton, M. J., ‘Towns and economic growth in eighteenth-century England’, in Abrams, Philip and Wrigley, E. A. eds., Towns in societies: essays in economic history and historical sociology (Cambridge, 1978), 245–77Google Scholar, here 271.

32 P. J. Corfield, ‘The social and economic history of Norwich, 1650–1850: a study in urban growth’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, 1976), 294.

33 Hoppit, J., Risk and failure in English business 1700–1800 (Cambridge, 1987), 74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Ibid., 76.

35 Schumpeter, E. B., English overseas trade statistics 1697–1808 (Oxford, 1960)Google Scholar, Table XLIV, 69.

36 Ibid. See also Priestley, U., ‘The Norwich textile industry: the London connection’, London Journal 19, 2 (1994), 108–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here 112.

37 The number of spinners required to support the Norwich industry exceeded the number of weavers. These spinners, women and children, were spread throughout East Anglia, and beyond [including Ireland], but there are few reliable statistics available to track temporal change. Hence, the focus on weavers.

38 Weatherill, Lorna, Consumer behavior and material culture in Britain, 1660–1760 (Cambridge, 1996), 166–89Google Scholar, 212–13. See also, Leigh Shaw-Taylor, ‘The nature and scale of the cottage economy’, Working Paper No. 15, University of Cambridge, https://www.hpss.geog.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/occupations/abstracts/ [accessed February 2011]; Sebastian Keibek, ‘Using probate data for estimating historical occupational structures’, Working Paper No. 27, University of Cambridge, http://www.campop.geog.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/occupations/abstracts/ [accessed October 2016].

39 Rowlands, Marie B., Masters and men in the West Midland metalware trades before the industrial revolution (Manchester, 1975), 1–3Google Scholar.

40 Stobart, Jon, The first industrial region: north-west England, c. 1700–60 (Manchester, 2004)Google Scholar, 67, 71.

41 Court, W. A. B., The rise of the Midland industries, 1600–1938 (London, 1996)Google Scholar.

42 Overton, Mark, Whittle, Jane, Dean, Darron and Harn, Andrew, Production and consumption in English households, 1600–1750 (Abingdon, 2004), 34Google Scholar; Clark, Gregory, ‘The consumer revolution: turning point in human history, or statistical artifact?’ (Davis, 2010)Google Scholar, http://faculty.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gclark/papers/Consumer%20Revolution.pdf [accessed September 2017]; Keibek, ‘Using probate data’, 7, 14, 15.

43 Norfolk Record Office, www.archives.norfolk.gov.uk/Archive-Collections/Guide-to-Holdings/NCC097896 [accessed June 2012].

44 Farrow, M. A. and Barton, T. F., Index of wills proved in the consistory Court of Norwich 1604–1686 (Norwich, 1958)Google Scholar; Barton, T. F. and Farrow, M. A., Index of wills proved in the Consistory Court of Norwich, 1687–1750 (Norwich, 1965)Google Scholar; Barton, T. F., Farrow, M. A., Bedingfield, A. L. and Kennedy, J., Index of wills proved in the Consistory Court of Norwich, 1751–1818 (Norwich, 1969)Google Scholar.

45 An analysis of a sample of male wills for the periods 1687–1750 and 1751–1818 indicates, in both instances, that more than 70 per cent of male wills recorded occupation.

46 These testamentary data also show that linen weaving was a predominantly rural activity.

47 Stoker, David, ‘The regulation of the book trade in Norwich, 1500–1800’, Publishing History, 5 (1979)Google Scholar.

48 Millican, Percy, The freemen of Norwich, 1714–1752 (Norwich, 1952)Google Scholar; J. K. Edwards, ‘The economic development of Norwich, 1750–1850, with special reference to the worsted industry’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 1963), 20–3, Appendix I.

49 S. Howell and K. Howell, ‘Norwich freemen, 1752–1981: an analysis of trades’ (unpublished transcription, Norfolk Record Office, 1999) [accessed October 2012].

50 Blomefield, Francis, An essay towards a topographical history of the county of Norfolk: volume iii, the history of the city and county of Norwich, part I (London, 1806), 443–54Google Scholar, 449, British History Online, http://www.british-history.ac.uk/topographical-hist-norfolk/vol3/443-454 [accessed October 2016].

51 Millican, Freemen, xi.

52 Edwards, ‘Economic development of Norwich’, 85, 95, 107.

53 ‘Parliamentary constituencies in the unreformed House’, http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/research/constituencies/constituencies-1715-1754 [accessed September 2012].

54 There were 92 ‘freemen boroughs’ that formed the largest group of English constituencies: Sir Namier, Lewis and Brooke, John, The House of Commons 1754–90, vol. I: The constituencies, repr. (London, 1985), 13Google Scholar.

55 White, W., History, gazetteer and directory of Norfolk and the city and county of the city of Norwich (Sheffield, 1836), 102–03Google Scholar.

56 John Cannon, ‘Poll books, a short guide 2’, http://www.history.org.uk/historian/resource/4016/poll-books [accessed October 2016].

57 C. Kirby, ‘The 1710 Norwich poll book’ (unpublished transcription, Norfolk Record Office, 1996) [accessed October 2011]; Chase, W., The poll for Members of Parliament for the city of Norwich (Norwich, 1761)Google Scholar; Chase, W., The poll for Members of Parliament for the City of Norwich (Norwich, 1768)Google Scholar; Suffield, B., A copy of the original poll book for a Member of Parliament for the City of Norwich (Norwich, 1786)Google Scholar; Warner, H. L., The poll for the knights of the shire for the county of Norfolk 1806, copied and published by S. A. Raymond and M. J. Raymond (Exeter, 1996)Google Scholar.

58 Eade, P., Some account of the parish of St. Giles, Norwich (London, 1886), 392–429Google Scholar.

59 The population estimate for 1761 is available from Wrigley, E. A., The early English censuses (Oxford, 2011)Google Scholar, Table M2.5 provided in the compact disc that accompanies the book. The proportion of the population that were adult men is taken from the reconstitution of the occupational structure of 26 parishes in 1831: Wrigley, E. A., Davies, R. S., Oeppen, J. E. and Schofield, R. S., English population history from family reconstitution 1580–1837 (Cambridge, 1997), 42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Data taken from the 1801 census, ‘Abstract of the answers and returns made pursuant to an Act passed in the forty first year of His Majesty King George III: an Act for taking account of the population of GreatBritain, and the increase or diminution thereof’, available from Historical Online Population Reports (University of Essex), http://www.histpop.org/ohpr/servlet/PageBrowser2?ResourceType=Census&SearchTerms=1801&SearchContent=All&ExpressionKind=All&Date=1801-1937&Geography=E&Geography=W&Geography=S&Geography=I&Geography=C&Sorting=resource-type%20date%20geography&path=Results&active=yes&treestate=expandnew&titlepos=0&mno=2&tocstate=expandnew&display=sections&display=tables&display=pagetitles&pageseq=252&zoom=3 [accessed June 2012].

61 Ideally, the number of worsted weavers in St Giles would have been compared with the number in another occupation, particularly with carpenters, but the latter were not present in sufficient numbers to allow a meaningful comparison to be made.

62 Priestley, Fabric, 36.

63 In addition, the court considered cases such as offences against by-laws, non-payment of tithes and taxes, bastardy orders, settlement and removal, vagrancy, and the licensing of victuallers. Richard Ratcliffe, ‘An introduction to Quarter Sessions Records’, The Family History Partnership, http://www.thefamilyhistorypartnership.com/hints-tips/introduction-to-quarter-sessions-records.php [accessed October 2016]; J. Gibson, Quarter Sessions Records for family historians (Bury, 2007).

64 Shoemaker, R. B., Prosecution and punishment: petty crime and the law in London and rural Middlesex, c. 1660–1725 (Cambridge, 1991), 6Google Scholar. The Assizes Court dealt with felonies, more serious crimes such as murder, rape, infanticide, robbery and burglary, and offences against coinage. See Beattie, J. M., Crime and the courts in England (Oxford, 1986), 5Google Scholar.

65 Shoemaker, Prosecution, 23.

66 Hay, D. and Snyder, F., Policing and prosecution in Britain 1750–1850 (Oxford, 1989), 25–6Google Scholar.

67 Bedford Record Office, www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/CommunityAndLiving/ArchivesAndrecordOffice/GuidesToCollections/Recognisances.aspax [accessed June 2012].

68 Shoemaker, Prosecution, 25, 108.

69 Cockburn, J. S., ‘Early-modern assize records as historical evidence’, Journal of the Society of Archivists 5, 4 (1975), 215–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Styles, J., The dress of the people (New Haven, 2007), 329Google Scholar.

71 Buchanan, K. McP., ‘Studies in the localisation of 17th Century Worcestershire industries (1600–1650)’, Transactions of the Worcestershire Archeological Society, Part 1 xvii (1940), 40–9Google Scholar; Part 2, xviii (1941), 31–40; Part 3, xix (1942), 45–54.

72 Beattie, Crime, 93.

73 Court, Midland industries.

74 R. A. Churchley, ‘Differing responses to an industrialising economy: occupations in rural communities in the heart of England from the restoration to the railway Age (c. 1660–1840)’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, 2010).

75 Linebaugh, P., ‘The ordinary of Newgate and his account’, in Cockburn, J. S. ed., Crime in England 1550–1800 (Cambridge, 1977), 246–69Google Scholar, cited in Beattie, Crime, 249.

76 King, Peter, ‘Decision-makers and decision-making in the English criminal law 1750–1800’, The Historical Journal 27, 1 (1984), 25–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Norfolk Record Office, Norfolk Session Rolls CS/S3/61b (1751–1758), CS/S3/62 (1775–1790); Norwich Case Records NCR Case 11a/107 (1712–1713); NCR Case 11a/108 (1714); NCR Case 11a/109 (1714–1716); NCR Case 11a/110 (1717); NCR Case 11a /111 (1718); NCR Case 11a/112 (1711–1721); NCR Case 11a/113 (1715–1740); NCR Case 11a/116 (1741–1746); NCR Case 11a/117 (1742–1749); NCR Case 11a/118 (1762–1768); NCR Case 11a/119 (1763–1765); NCR Case 11a/120 (1766–1767); NCR Case 11a/121 (1767–1768); NCR Case 11a/122 (1768–1769); NR Case 11a/123 (1770–1773); NCR Case 11a/124 (1770–1778); NCR Case 11a/125 (1771); NCR Case 11a/126 (1773–1774); NCR Case 11a/127 (1775); NCR Case 11a/128 (1775–77); NCR Case 11a/129 (1776–1778); NCR Case 11a/130 (1778–1779); NCR Case 11a/131 (1778–1782); NCR Case 11a/132 (1780–1782); NCR Case 11a/133 (1781 and 1783); NCR Case 11a/134 (1781–1783); NCR Case 11a/135 (1780–1790); NCR Case 11a/146 (1769–1770); NCR Case 11a/147 (1770–1772); NCR Case 11a/148 (1771–1773); NCR Case 11a/149 (1775–1776); NCR Case 11a/150 (1777–1779); NCR Case 11d/21 (1791–1780); NCR Case 11d/22 (1800/1802/1808/1810); NCR case, 11e/23 (1811–1820); NCR case 11e/24 (1818–1823); NCR Case 12b Box 2, number 5 (1722–1740); NCR case 12b Box 2, number 6 (1741–1751); NCR case 12b Box 2, number 8 (1770–1772); NCR case 12b Box 2, number 9 (1773–1776); NCR case 12b Box 2, number 10 (1777–1780); NCR case 12b Box 2, number 11 (1782–1783); NCR case 12b Box 2, number 12 (1781–1790).

78 There are insufficient data to permit the analysis of temporal change in the number of prosecutors of unspecified misdemeanour.

79 ‘1813–20 PREnglandWalesOccs.mbd’, http://files-occs.geog.cam.ac.uk/.

80 Norwich and Manchester population totals are taken from Wrigley, Early English, Table A2.7.

81 Wrigley et al., English population, 42–50.

82 Women and children wove significant quantities of plain cotton goods in Lancashire, 1810–1819; see G. W. Daniels, ‘The cotton trade at the close of the Napoleonic War’, Transactions of the Manchester Statistical Society (1917–1918), 1–29, Appendix II; J. L. Hammond and Barbara Hammond, The skilled labourer 1760–1842, paperback edn (Guernsey, 1995, first published 1919), 60.

83 Coleman, D. C., ‘Growth and decay during the industrial revolution: the case of East Anglia’, The Scandinavian Economic History Review 10, 1 (1962), 115–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here 122.

84 Ibid., 123–4.

85 Reports from the assistant hand-loom weavers' commissioners, part II: parl. papers (1840), 43–I, 301–28, 309.

86 Higgs, Edward, ‘Women, occupations and work in the nineteenth-century censuses’, History Workshop 23, spring (1987), 59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Higgs, E., Making sense of the census revisited: census records for England and Wales, 1801–190: a handbook for historical researchers (London, 2005)Google Scholar; Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure, University of Cambridge, ‘1851 CensusReportEngWalesCountyNatOccs.mbd’, http://files-occs.geog.cam.ac.uk [accessed October 2014].

87 Sugden, ‘Location’, 208–26.

88 Wrigley, Early English, Table A2.7.

89 Ibid., Table A2.6.

90 Wadsworth, A. P. and de Lacy Mann, J., The cotton trade and industrial Lancashire 1600–1780 (Manchester, 1965), 477Google Scholar; Smelser, N. J., Social change in the industrial revolution: an application of theory to the Lancashire cotton industry 1770–1840 (London, 1959), 85–7Google Scholar.

91 Bolton History Centre, ‘The Crompton papers, general correspondence and papers 1800–1802’, Microfilm, ZCR 6 (1802); Chapman, S. D., The early factory masters: the transition to the factory system in the Midlands textile industry (Aldershot, 1992), 101–02Google Scholar; von Tunzelmann, G. N., Steam power and British industrialization to 1860 (Oxford, 1978), 241Google Scholar; Berg, M., The age of manufactures 1700–1820, 2nd edn (Abingdon, 2005), 241Google Scholar.

92 Chapman, S. D., ‘The pioneers of worsted spinning by power’, Business History 7, 2 (1974), 97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 Hudson, Pat, ‘Capital and credit in the West Riding’, in Hudson, Pat ed., Regions and industries: a perspective on the industrial revolution in Britain (Cambridge, 1989), 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Sugden, Keith, ‘An occupational study to track the rise of adult male mule spinning in Lancashire and Cheshire, 1777–1813’, Textile History 48, 2 (20170, 160–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 Turner, M., ‘Counting sheep: waking up to new estimates of livestock numbers in England c. 1800’, The Agricultural History Review 46, 2 (1998), 142–61Google Scholar. See also James, History, 320–1.

96 Clark, Gregory, ‘Farm wages and living standards in the Industrial Revolution: England 1670–1869’, The Economic History Review 54, 3 (2001), 477–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

97 Hunt, E. H., ‘Industrialization and regional equality: wages in Britain, 1760–1914’, Journal of Economic History 46, 4 (1986), 965CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Hunt, E. H., ‘Wages’, in Langton, J. and Morris, R. J. eds., Atlas of industrializing Britain 1780–1914 (London, 1986), 60–8Google Scholar, 62–3.

98 A. Young, Farmer's tour, 75; Young, A., A six months tour through the north of England, vol. i (London, 1770), 152Google Scholar.

99 Keith Sugden, ‘An occupational analysis of the worsted industry, circa 1700–1851: a study of de-industrialization in Norfolk and the rise of the West Riding of Yorkshire’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2016); Styles, J., ‘Spinners and the law: regulating yarn standards in the English worsted industries, 1500–1800’, Textile History 44, 2 (2013), 145–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here 154.

100 Ponting, Baines's account, 44–5.

101 There is some evidence to suggest that only 20 per cent of the output was exported, although this figure has been challenged and may not be reliable. British Library, Lansdowne MS 856, fol. 248, cited in U. Priestley, ‘The London connection’, 112; Corfield, ‘Provincial capital’, 279–80.

102 Defoe, Tour, 93.

103 Lord, P. R. and Mohamed, M. H., Weaving: conversion of yarn to fabric (Durham, 1992), 8–10Google Scholar; Ashworth, W., Customs and excise: trade, production and consumption in England, 1640–1845 (Oxford, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 39, 352.

104 James, History, 222.

105 Hoppit, Risk, 1987.

106 James, History, 222; Chassagne, S., ‘Calico printing in Europe before 1780’, in Jenkins, D. ed., The Cambridge history of Western textiles (Cambridge, 2003), 513–27Google Scholar, 521; Ashworth, W., Customs and excise: trade, production and consumption in England, 1640–1845 (Oxford, 2003), 352CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107 Manchester, St Mary, St Denys and St George was the parish church, later the cathedral. ‘Manchester, England, marriages and banns, 1754–1930’, images available at www.ancestry.com [accessed April 2015].

108 Mitchell, B. R., British historical statistics (Cambridge, 1988), 330Google Scholar.