Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:19:57.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Partner choice and intergenerational occupational mobility: the case of nineteenth-century rural Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

MARTIN DRIBE
Affiliation:
Centre for Economic Demography and Department of Economic History, Lund University.
CHRISTER LUNDH
Affiliation:
Department of Economic History, University of Gothenburg.

Abstract

This article studies the effects of marriage partner choice on occupational attainment and mobility in five rural parishes in southern Sweden between about 1815 and 1894. It uses an individual-level database containing information on a large number of marriages and the occupational origin of the marrying couple, regardless of whether they were born in the parish or not. Occupations are coded in HISCO and classified using HISCLASS. The results indicate the presence of occupational homogamy in this rural society. The social origin of the partner also mattered a great deal for subsequent occupational attainment and mobility, both upwards and downwards.

Le choix du partenaire et la mobilité professionnelle entre générations: le cas de la suède rurale du 19e siècle

Nous étudions ici, pour cinq paroisses rurales de la Suède du Sud entre les années 1815 et 1894, les effets du choix du conjoint sur la profession à laquelle on aboutit et sur la mobilité. Nous recourons pour cela à une base de données individuelles nous donnant des informations sur un grand nombre de mariages et sur la profession d'origine des futurs mariés, qu'ils soient ou non nés dans telle paroisse. Pour les professions, nous recourons au code HISCO, en les classant selon HISCLASS. De cette recherche, il ressort l'existence d'une homogamie professionnelle dans cette société rurale. L'origine sociale du conjoint exerçait aussi une forte influence sur le niveau de profession auquel on pouvait parvenir, ainsi que sur la mobilité, que ce soit vers le haut ou vers le bas.

Partnerwahl und intergenerationale berufliche mobilität: das ländliche schweden im 19. jahrhundert

Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Auswirkungen der Partnerwahl auf den erzielten Beruf und die Mobiltät in fünf ländlichen Gemeinden in Südschweden zwischen ca. 1815 und 1894. Es wird eine Einzelpersonendatenbank benutzt, die Informationen über eine große Anzahl von Heiraten und den beruflichen Hintergrund des Brautpaares enthält, unabhängig davon, ob die Ehepartner in der Gemeinde geboren wurden oder nicht. Die Berufe werden nach HISCO kodiert und mit Hilfe von HISCLASS klassifiziert. Die Ergebnisse lassen darauf schließen, dass in dieser ländlichen Gesellschaft berufliche Homogamie bestand. Ferner spielte die soziale Herkunft des Partners nicht nur für die weitere berufliche Karriere eine große Rolle, sondern auch für die Aufstiegs- wie für die Abstiegsmobilität.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1 Robert Erikson and John H. Goldthorpe, The constant flux: a study of class mobility in industrial societies (Oxford, 1993), 3–9.

2 Jonsson, Jan O. and Erikson, Robert, ‘Understanding educational inequality: the Swedish experience’, L'Année Sociologique 50 (2000), 345–82Google Scholar; Breen, Richard and Jonsson, Jan O., ‘Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: recent research on educational attainment and social mobility’, Annual Review of Sociology 31 (2005), 223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Lawrence Stone, The family, sex and marriage in England 1500–1800 (London, 1977), ch. 7; Michael Mitterauer and Reinhard Sieder, The European family: patriarchy to partnership from the Middle Ages to the present (Chicago, 1982), ch. 6; Dribe, Martin and Lundh, Christer, ‘Finding the right partner: rural homogamy in nineteenth-century Sweden’, International Review of Social History 50 (2005), 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Joseph Ehmer, ‘Marriage’, in David I. Kertzer and Marzio Barbabli eds., Family life In the long nineteenth century 1789–1913 (New Haven, 2002), 282–321; David W. Sabean, Kinship in Neckarhausen, 1700–1870 (Cambridge, 1998).

5 Pierre Bourdieu, ‘Marriage strategies as strategies of social reproduction’, in Robert Forster and Orest Ranum eds., Family and society: selections from the Annales: Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations (Baltimore, 1976).

6 Dribe and Lundh, ‘Finding the right partner’.

7 Milton M. Gordon, Assimilation in American life (New York, 1964).

8 Peter M. Blau, Inequality and heterogeneity (Glencoe, 1977); Breen and Jonsson, ‘Inequality of opportunity’; McCaa, Robert, ‘Isolation or assimilation? A log linear interpretation of Australian marriages, 1947–60, 1975, and 1986’, Population Studies 43 (1989), 155–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kalmijn, Matthijs, ‘Status homogamy in the United States’, American Journal of Sociology 97 (1991), 496523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Blau, Peter M., Beeker, Carolyn and Fitzpatrick, Kevin M., ‘Intersecting social affiliations and intermarriage’, Social Forces 62 (1984), 585606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Wildsmith, Elisabeth, Gutman, Myron P. and Gratton, Brian, ‘Assimilation and intermarriage for U.S. immigrant groups, 1880–1990’, History of the Family 8 (2003), 563–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Dribe and Lundh, ‘Finding the right partner’.

12 Granlund, John, ‘Bröllopsfunktionärer’, Fataburen 64 (1969), 133–48.Google Scholar

13 Eva Wigström, Allmogeseder i Rönnebergs härad på 1840-talet (Malmö, 1985; first published 1891), 27–8; Nils G. Bruzelius, Allmogelivet i Ingelstads härad i Skåne (Lund, 1976; first published 1876), 34, Nicolovius, Folklifwet i Skytts härad i Skåne vid början af detta århundrade (Malmö, 1990; first published 1847), 121–2.

14 Bruzelius, Allmogelivet i Ingelstads härad, 34.

15 Van Bavel, Jan, Peeters, Hilde and Matthijs, Koen, ‘Connections between intergenerational and marital mobility: a case study: Leuven, 1830–1910’, Historical Methods 31 (1998), 122–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 John R. Hajnal, ‘Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system’, in Richard Wall, Jean Robin and Peter Laslett eds., Family forms in historic Europe (Cambridge, 1983); Peter Laslett, Family life and illicit love in earlier generations (Cambridge, 1977); Michael Mitterauer, Sozialgeschichte der Jugend (Frankfurt am Main, 1986); Ann Kussmaul, Servants in husbandry in early modern England (Cambridge, 1981).

17 Lundh, Christer, ‘The social mobility of servants in rural Sweden in the nineteenth century’, Continuity and Change 14 (1999), 5789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Nils Wohlin, Emigrationsutredningen, Bilaga 11: Torpare-, backstugu- och inhysesklasserna: öfversikt af deras uppkomst, tillväxt och aftagande med särskild hänsyn till torparklassens undergräfvande (Stockholm, 1908), and Emigrationsutredningen, Bilaga 10: Faran af bondeklassens undergräfvande i sammanhang med de gamla arfvejordåskådningarnas upplösning, emigrationen och bondjordens mobilisering (Stockholm, 1910); Sten Carlsson, Ståndssamhälle och ståndspersoner 1700–1865 (Lund, 1949); Gösta Carlsson, Social mobility and class structure (Lund, 1958).

19 Christer Winberg, Folkökning och proletarisering: kring den sociala strukturomvandlingen på Sveriges landsbygd under den agrara revolutionen (Gothenburg, 1975); Sture Martinius, Peasant destinies: the history of 552 Swedes born 1810–12 (Stockholm, 1977); Sten Carlsson, Fröknar, mamseller, jungfrur och pigor: ogifta kvinnor i det svenska ståndssamhället (Uppsala, 1977); Ingrid Eriksson and John Rogers, Rural labor and population change: social and demographic developments in east-central Sweden during the nineteenth century (Uppsala, 1978); Johan Söderberg, Agrar fattigdom i Sydsverige under 1800-talet (Stockholm, 1978).

20 See Söderberg, Johan, ‘Metoder att analysera social rörlighet’, Historisk Tidskrift 98 (1978), 283304.Google Scholar For a recent study using multivariate statistical methods on the same area as used in this article, see Dribe, Martin and Svensson, Patrick, ‘Social mobility in nineteenth century rural Sweden – a micro level analysis’, Scandinavian Economic History Review 56 (2008), 122–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 See Historical Methods 31 (1998), special issue on social mobility.

22 See Fataburen 64 (1969), special issue on marriage.

23 Carlsson, Fröknar, mamseller; Gunnar Fridlizius, ‘Sweden’, in W. R. Lee ed., European demography and economic growth (London, 1979); Gaunt, David, ‘I slottets skugga: om frälsebönders sociala problem i Borgeby och Löddeköpinge under 1700-talet’, Ale 4 (1977), 1529Google Scholar; Gaunt, David, ‘Pre-industrial economy and population structure’, Scandinavian Journal of History 2 (1977), 183210CrossRefGoogle Scholar; David Gaunt, ‘Family planning and the pre-industrial society: some Swedish evidence’, in K. Ågren et al. eds., Aristocrats, farmers and proletarians (Uppsala, 1973), 28–59; Eriksson and Rogers, Rural labor; Winberg, Folkökning; Sune Åkerman, ‘A demographic study of a pre-transitional society’, in S. Åkerman, H. C. Johansen and D. Gaunt eds., Chance and change: social and economic studies in historical demography in the Baltic area (Odense, 1978), 33–48; Lundh, Christer, ‘Giftermålsmönster i Sverige före det industriella genombrottet’, Lund Papers in Economic History 31 (Lund, 1993).Google Scholar

24 Christer Lundh, ‘Nuptiality in pre-industrial Sweden’, paper presented to the conference ‘Nuptiality and Family Formation in Comparative Eurasian Perspective’ arranged by the Eurasian Project on Population and Family History, Peking University, 25–29 December 1998; Martin Dribe and Christer Lundh, ‘Rural marriage in nineteenth century Sweden: influence of household context and socioeconomic conditions on the age at marriage in four Scanian parishes’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Social Science History Association, Fort Worth, 11–14 November 1999; Lundh, Christer, ‘Remarriages in Sweden in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’, History of the Family 7 (2002), 423–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Satomi Kurosu, Christer Lundh and Marco Breschi, ‘Economic and household factors of remarriage in Eurasian perspective’, paper for the FAM18 session ‘Marriage and Remarriage in Eurasian Perspective’, at the European Social Science History conference, Amsterdam, 22–25 March 2006; Dribe, Martin, Lundh, Christer and Nystedt, Paul, ‘Widowhood strategies in preindustrial society’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 38 (2007), 207–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lundh, Christer, ‘Remarriage, gender and social class: a longitudinal study of remarriage in southern Sweden 1766–1894’, Continuity and Change 22 (2007), 373406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Dribe and Lundh, ‘Finding the right partner’.

26 van Leeuwen, Marco H. D. and Maas, Ineke, ‘Partner choice and homogamy in the nineteenth century: was there a sexual revolution in Europe?’, Journal of Social History 36 (2002), 101–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Maas, Ineke and van Leeuwen, Marco H. D., ‘Industrialization and intergenerational mobility in Sweden’, Acta Sociologica 45 (2002), 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Dribe and Svensson, ‘Social mobility’. This study deals with the same area, but uses a broader socioeconomic classification based on access to land.

28 The Scanian Demographic Database is a collaborative project between the Regional Archives in Lund and the Research Group in Population Economics at the Department of Economic History, Lund University. The source material is described by Reuterswärd, Elisabeth and Olsson, Franceska, in ‘Skånes Demografiska Databas 1646–1894: en källbeskrivning’, Lund Papers in Economic History 33 (1991)Google Scholar, and the quality of the data is analysed in Bengtsson, Tommy and Lundh, Christer, ‘Evaluation of a Swedish computer program for automatic family reconstitution’, Lund Papers in Economic History 8 (1991).Google Scholar

29 Martin Dribe, Leaving home in a peasant society: economic fluctuations, household dynamics and youth migration in southern Sweden, 1829–1866 (Lund, 2000).

30 Befolkningsutvecklingen under 250 år, Statistics Sweden (Stockholm, 1999), 42.

31 Bengtsson and Lundh, ‘Evaluation of a Swedish computer program’.

32 Ruggles, Steven, ‘Migration, marriage and mortality: correcting sources of bias in English family reconstitutions’, Population Studies 46 (1992), 507–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Ruggles, Steven, ‘The limitations of English family reconstitution: English population history from family reconstitution, 1580–1837’, Continuity and Change 14 (1999), 105–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wrigley, E. A., ‘The effect of migration on the estimation of marriage age in family reconstitution studies’, Population Studies 48 (1994), 8197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Kasakoff, Alice B. and Adams, John W., ‘The effect of migration on ages at vital events: a critique of family reconstitution in historical demography’, European Journal of Population 11 (1995), 199242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

33 Dribe, Leaving home, and ‘Migration of rural families in nineteenth century southern Sweden: a longitudinal analysis of local migration patterns’, History of the Family 8 (2003), 247–65; Dribe and Lundh, ‘Finding the right partner’.

34 See Dribe, Leaving home, ch. 2.

35 Occupations were first coded into HISCO and classified into HISCLASS using the following recode job: I. Maas and M. H. D. van Leeuwen, hisco_hisclass12a_@inc, May 2004; see http://historyofwork.iisg.nl/list_pub.php?categories=hisclass [accessed 19 September 2008]. See also Marco H. D. van Leeuwen and I. Maas, ‘A short note on HISCLASS’, November 2005, available at http://historyofwork.iisg.nl/docs/hisclass-brief.doc; Marco H. D. van Leeuwen, Ineke Maas and Andrew Miles, HISCO: Historical International Classification of Occupations (Leuven, 2002); Maas, Ineke and van Leeuwen, Marco H. D., ‘Total and relative endogamy by social origin: a first international comparison of changes in marriage choices during the nineteenth century’, International Review of Social History 50 (2005), 275–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Goodman, Leo A., ‘On the measurement of social mobility: an index of status persistence’, American Sociological Review 34 (1969), 831–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goodman, Leo A., ‘Multiplicative models for the analysis of occupational mobility tables and other kinds of cross-classification tables’, American Journal of Sociology 84 (1979), 804–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 For example Erikson and Goldthorpe, The constant flux; Van Bavel, Peeters and Matthijs, ‘Connections’; van Leeuwen, Marco H. D. and Maas, Ineke, ‘Log-linear analysis of changes in mobility patterns: some models with an application to the Amsterdam upper classes in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century’, Historical Methods 24 (1991), 6679CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and ‘Long-term social mobility: research agenda and a case study (Berlin, 1825–1957)’, Continuity and Change 11 (1996), 399–433; van Poppel, Frans, de Jong, Jurjen and Liefbroer, Art C., ‘The effects of paternal mortality on son's social mobility: a nineteenth-century example’, Historical Methods 31 (1998), 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Dribe and Lundh, ‘Finding the right partner’; Kalmijn, ‘Status homogamy’; Kalmijn, Matthijs, ‘Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status’, American Journal of Sociology 100 (1994), 422–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mare, Robert D., ‘Five decades of educational assortative mating’, American Sociological Review 56 (1991), 1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McCaa, ‘Isolation or assimilation?’; Van de Putte, Bart, ‘Homogamy by geographical origin: segregation in nineteenth-century Flemish cities (Gent, Leuven, and Aalst)’, Journal of Family History 28 (2003), 364–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; van Leeuwen, Maas and Miles, HISCO.

39 See J. Scott Long, Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables (Thousand Oaks, 1997), ch. 5.

40 Models were also estimated for the full sample, yielding highly similar results (not shown, but available upon request), which shows that the results presented are robust to the narrowing of the sample.

41 Eriksson and Rogers, Rural labor; Christer Persson, Jorden bonden och hans familj: en studie av bondejordbruket i en socken i norra Småland under 1800-talet, med särskild hänsyn till jordägande, sysselsättning och familje- och hushållsbildning (Stockholm, 1992); Winberg, Folkökning. Similar results were also found in the Scanian sample using a broader socioeconomic classification based on access to land; see Dribe and Svensson, ‘Social mobility’.

42 See, for example, Long, Regression models, ch. 6.

43 In the sample used in the estimations in Table 7, 40 per cent of men and 41 per cent of women married homogamously and 26 per cent of men and 27 per cent of women married upwards, while 35 per cent of men and 32 per cent of women married downwards.