Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:07:36.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transnational Practices Governing European Integration: Executive Autonomy and Neo-Corporatist Concertation in the Steel Sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2018

WOLFRAM KAISER
WOLFRAM KAISER*
Affiliation:
School of Social, Historical and Literary Studies, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The European Coal and Steel Community was marked by institutional innovations. They have masked strong continuities in administrative and business communities and their governance practices, however, which persisted after 1945. Based on fresh research in national and international organisation archives, this article explores the origins before, during and after the First World War of two key elements of these practices, their evolution over time and their influence on post-war Western European governance of the steel sector: the struggle for executive autonomy and close transnational industry cooperation. Both practices clashed in the ECSC, became amalgamated and had lasting impact on the present-day European Union and its democratic deficit.

Type
Article
Information
Contemporary European History , Volume 27 , Special Issue 2: Continuity and Change in European Cooperation during the Twentieth Century , May 2018 , pp. 239 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, ‘Jean Monnet, father of Europe’. Film (12 min) including interview with Jean Monnet, available at http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/video/player.cfm?ref=I000321 (last visited 6 Dec. 2017).

2 See also Brandt, Josef, ‘Der Stahleuropäer Tony Rollman’, in Barthel, Charles and Kirps, Josée, eds., Terres rouges. Histoire de la sidérurgie luxembourgeoise, vol. 2 (Luxembourg: Centre d’études et de recherches européennes, 2010), 10–34.Google Scholar

3 Delphine Kiefer, Tony Rollman (Dudelange: Centre national de l'audiovisuel, n.d.).

4 Schuman Authority. Proposed action on the Schuman Plan, no date, ARR 14/1360, Box 67, Folder 1/3/3, United Nations Office Geneva Archives.

5 Max Kohnstamm to Jean Monnet, AMH 6/4/14, Fondation Jean Monnet pour l'Europe Lausanne.

6 Monnet, Jean, Mémoires (Paris: Fayard, 1976)Google Scholar. Biographical accounts of Monnet include Schwabe, Klaus, Jean Monnet, Frankreich, die Deutschen und die Einigung Europas (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wells, Sherill Brown, Jean Monnet. Unconventional Statesman (Boulder/Col.: Lynne Rienner, 2011)Google Scholar; Fransen, Frederic J., The Supranational Politics of Jean Monnet. Ideas and Origins of the European Community (Westport/Conn.: Greenwood, 2001)Google Scholar; Duchêne, François, Jean Monnet. The First Statesman of Interdependence (New York: Norton, 1994)Google Scholar. On contradictory representations of Monnet in the historiography see Pūras, Adomas, ‘A Shape-Shifting Creature Dissected: Political Representations of Jean Monnet in European Studies’, Baltic Journal of Political Science, 4 (2015), 110–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 On the EU's own narrative see especially the European Parliament's attempt at putting the history of Europe and of European integration into a dedicated museum: Wolfram Kaiser, Limits of Cultural Engineering: Actors and Narratives in the European Parliament's House of European History Project, Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 55, no. 3 (2017), 518–34.

8 See Leucht, Brigitte, ‘Transatlantic Policy Networks in the Creation of the First European Anti-Trust Law: Mediating Between American Anti-trust and German Ordo-liberalism’, in Kaiser, Wolfram, Leucht, Brigitte and Rasmussen, Morten, eds., The History of the European Union: Origins of a Trans- and Supranational Polity 1950–72 (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009), 56–3Google Scholar. On the creation of the ECSC see also Spierenburg, Dirk and Poidevin, Raymond, The History of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community: Supranationality in Operation (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1994)Google Scholar, co-authored by a former member of the High Authority.

9 For competition policy see, for example, the contributions to Klaus Patel, Kiran and Schweitzer, Heike, eds., The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Françoise Berger, ‘La France, l'Allemagne et l'acier (1932–1952). De la stratégie des cartels à l’élaboration de la CECA’, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, 2000; Gillingham, John, Industry and Politics in the Third Reich. Ruhr Coal, Hitler and Europe (London: Methuen, 1985)Google Scholar.

11 See Gillingham, John, Coal, Steel, and the Rebirth of Europe, 1945–1955: The Germans and French from Ruhr Conflict to Economic Community (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 For Monnet's role in the creation of the ECSC see also Lynch, Frances, The Role of Jean Monnet in Setting up the European Coal and Steel Community, in Schwabe, Klaus, ed., Die Anfänge des Schuman-Plans 1950/51 (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 117–29.Google Scholar

13 On the interwar steel networks and cartels see, for example, Dumoulin, Michel, ed., Réseaux économiques et construction européenne (Brussels: Peter Lang, 2004)Google Scholar; Wurm, Clemens, ed., International Cartels and Foreign Policy. Studies on the Interwar Period (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1989)Google Scholar.

14 See the chapters on national industry attitudes to the Schuman Plan in Schwabe, ed., Die Anfänge.

15 See, for example, Lynch, Frances B., France and the International Economy: from Vichy to the Treaty of Rome (London: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar.

16 See Leucht, Brigitte, Transatlantic Policy Networks and the Formation of Core Europe, PhD (Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth, UK, 2008)Google Scholar. On US policy towards Western European cooperation after 1945 more generally see also Hogan, Michael, The Marshall Plan. America, Britain, and the Reconstruction of Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 See also Piétri, Nicole, ‘Jean Monnet et les organismes interalliés durant la Première Guerre Mondiale’, in Bossuat, Gérard and Wilkens, Andreas, eds., Jean Monnet, l'Europe et les chemins de la paix (Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 1999), 23–30Google Scholar.

18 Allied Maritime Transport Council, Full Association of the United States Government, Lancaster House, 12 Oct. 1918, MAF 60/91, National Archives. For Salter's account see Salter, Arthur, Allied Shipping Control: An Experiment in International Administration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1921)Google Scholar. See also ‘Inter-Allied Economic Organizations in the Course of the World War of 1914–1918’, Annals of Public and Comparative Economics, 16, 1 (1940), 8–20.

19 The Monnet Programme, BBC, 1971, JMAS 4, Historical Archives of the European Union.

20 Memorandum de Monnet, 27 May 1919, Doc. 996, in Hunter Miller, David, My Diary at the Conference of Paris, with Documents, vol. 9 (New York: Appeal Printing, 1924), 447–53Google Scholar.

21 Eric Drummond to Jean Monnet, 2 July 1921, Fonds SDN, Fondation Jean Monnet pour l'Europe.

22 Kaiser, Wolfram and Schot, Johan, Writing the Rules for Europe. Experts, Cartels, and International Organization (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014)Google Scholar, ch. 2. On the reform debate in the League of Nations, which sought to make ‘technical’ cooperation a greater priority, see also Clavin, Patricia, Securing the World Economy. The Reinvention of the League of Nations 1920–1946 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

23 See in greater detail Druelle-Korn, Clotilde, ‘De la pensée à l'action économique: Etienne Clémentel (1864–1936), un ministre visionaire’, Histoire@Politique, 16 (2012), 40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Godfrey, John F., Capitalism at war. Industrial policy and bureaucracy in France (1914–1918) (New York: Berg, 1987)Google Scholar.

24 Monnet, Note pour M. Clémentel, no. 2, 2 Nov. 1918, F12/7795, Archives Nationales; Monnet to Fillioux, 25 Nov. 1918, AMB 1/1/16, Fondation Jean Monnet pour l'Europe.

25 MacMillan, Margaret, Paris 1919. Six Months that Changed the World (New York: Random House, 2002), 183Google Scholar.

26 For the French experience with British reticence see, for example, Cambon, Ambassadeur de France en Angleterre, Direction des Affaires Politiques et Commerciales, to Ribot, Président du Conseil, Ministre des Affaires Etrangères, Négociations à Londres de M. le Ministre du Commerce au sujet des transport maritimes, 5 Sept. 1917, Correspondence Politique et Commerciale 1897 à 1918, vol. 1277 (microfilm PO 1229), Archives des Affaires Etrangères.

27 Minutes of a Conference held at 2 Whitehall Gardens, on Tuesday, 30 Apr. 1918, at 3pm, MAF 60/91, National Archives.

28 Inter-Ally Council and Inter-Ally Executives, Report by Mr. Chamberlain, War Cabinet, G.T. 45559, MAF 60/91, National Archives; Chamberlain, Offices of the War Cabinet, to Clynes, 14 May 1918, MAF 60/91, National Archives.

29 For French perceptions of this British domestic policy priority see Fillioux, Note confidentielle, 21 Sept. 1918, AMB 1/1/16, Fondation Jean Monnet pour l'Europe. See also Winter, Jay, The Great War and the British People, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)Google Scholar.

30 See Soutou, Georges-Henri, L'or et le sang. Les buts de guerre économique de la première guerre mondiale (Paris: Fayard, 1989)Google Scholar.

31 Pour M. le Président du Conseil, de la part de M. Clémentel, Prière de remettre d'urgence à M. Painleve, London, 18 Oct. 1917, Correspondance Politique et Commerciale 1897 à 1918, vol. 1277, Archives des Affaires Étrangères.

32 Hanson, Inter-Allied Munitions Council, British Secretariat, Paris, to Layton, 21 Sept. 1918, MUN 4/869, National Archives.

33 Rhondda, The Food Situation in France. Memorandum by the Food Controller, Ministry of Food, 15 Mar. 1918, MAF 60/91, National Archives.

34 Maclay, Ministry of Shipping, to Clémentel, 7 Aug. 1918, F12/7795, Archives Nationales.

35 Fransen, The Supranational Politics, 92; Gillingham, Coal, Steel, and the Rebirth of Europe, 232.

36 Reuter, Paul, ‘Aux Origines du Plan Schuman’, in Teitgen, Pierre-Henri, ed., Mélanges Fernand Dehousse, vol. 2 (Paris: Nathan, 1979), 67Google Scholar.

37 For more detail see Kaiser and Schot, Writing the Rules for Europe, in particular ch. 1 and 4.

38 Carlisle, Robert B., ‘The Birth of Technocracy: Science, Society, and Saint-Simonians’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 35, 3 (1974), 445–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Harms, Bernhard, Volkswirtschaft und Weltwirtschaft. Versuch der Begründung einer Weltwirtschaftslehre (Jena: Fischer, 1912), 250–1Google Scholar.

40 Salter, Arthur, Recovery. The Second Effort (New York: Century Co., 1932), 207.Google Scholar

41 On this debate see in greater detail Wolfram Kaiser, ‘Gesellschaftliche Akteure und Experten in internationalen Organisationen: Die Kartell-Debatte im Völkerbund 1925–1931’, in Bachem-Rehm, Michaela, Hiepel, Claudia and Türk, Henning, eds., Teilungen überwinden. Europäische und internationale Geschichte im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Munich: Oldenbourg 2014), 317–28Google Scholar. For the broader context see Clavin, Securing the World Economy.

42 Economic Committee, Seventh Meeting held in Geneva on Thursday, 3 Dec. 1925, at 11 a.m., E/17th Session/P.V.7.(1), League of Nations Archives.

43 Lammers, Clemens, Review of Legislation on Cartels and Trusts, League of Nations, Economic and Financial Section, International Economic Conference (Geneva: League of Nations, 1927)Google Scholar.

44 Resolution, International Economic Conference, Industrial Agreements, 19 May 1927, S.C.E./II/C.R./2, Section 10, 53332, Box R 465, League of Nations Archives.

45 Préparation d'un mémorandum par trois experts juristes, draft, 9 July 1927, Section 10, 9989, 4274, Box R 2830, League of Nations Archives.

46 Economic Relations Section, Outline for a general report by the experts on economic problems arising in connection with international industrial agreements, Geneva, 7 May 1931, Hors Série no. 34, Section 10, 24459, 4275, Box R 2830, League of Nations Archives.

47 Société des Nations, Rapport et projet de résolutions présentés par la deuxième Commission à l'Assemblée, Geneva, 23 Sept. 1931, 4–5.

48 See Ulrich Nocken, ‘International Cartels and Foreign Policy: The Formation of the International Steel Cartel 1924–1926’, in Clemens A. Wurm, ed., International Cartels, 33–82.

49 On the Mayrisch Committee see in greater detail Müller, Guido, Europäische Gesellschaftsbeziehungen nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Das Deutsch-Französische Studienkomitee und der Europäische Kulturbund (Munich: Oldenbourg, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Barthel, Charles, ‘Emile Mayrisch et le pacte international de l'acier des années vingt’, Journal of European Integration History, 12, 1 (2006), 43–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Gillingham, Industry and Politics, 148. On the relations among the German steel companies see also Mollin, Gerhard Th., Montankonzerne und „Drittes Reich”: Der Gegensatz zwischen Monopolindustrie und Befehlswirtschaft in der deutschen Rüstung und Expansion 1936–1944 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Volkmann, Hans-Erich, Luxemburg im Zeichen des Hakenkreuzes: Eine politische Wirtschaftsgeschichte 1933 bis 1944 (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2010), 105Google Scholar.

52 Gillingham, Industry and Politics, 159.

53 Ibid., 112.

54 See, for example, Kaiser, Wolfram, ‘From Post-War Reconstruction to Multi-level Neo-Corporatism: The OEEC/OECD and Steel during the Cold War’, in Leimgruber, Matthieu and Schmelzer, Matthias, eds., The OECD and the International Political Economy since 1948 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 See Kipping, Matthias, Zwischen Kartellen und Konkurrenz. Der Schuman-Plan und die Ursprünge der europäischen Einigung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996)Google Scholar.

56 On the transformation of the steel sector see D'Costa, Anthony P., The Global Restructuring of the Steel Industry. Innovations, Institutions, and Industrial Change (London: Routledge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eckart, Karl and Kortus, Bronislaw, Die Eisen- und Stahlindustrie in Europa im strukturellen und regionalen Wandel (Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Warren, Kenneth, World Steel: An Economic Geography (Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1975)Google Scholar.

57 Declaration of Mr. Jean Monnet, President of the Schuman Plan Conference, JMDS 70 (English version), Historical Archives of the European Union.

58 Kurzbericht über die Sitzung des Beratenden Ausschusses vom 21 Apr. 1953 im Rathaus von Luxembourg, um 11.45 Uhr, CM 1/1953 107, Historical Archives of the European Union.

59 ‘Monnet – Europe's No. 1 Man of Ideas – and Hope’, Newsweek, 16 Feb. 1953.

60 Ibid. His own entirely practical ideas were quite close to Karl Deutsch's conceptualisation in his theory of ‘transactionalism’ that increased transnational (institutional) contacts among states, institutions and individuals can foster new forms of ‘community’ and integration. See Deutsch, Karl et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957)Google Scholar. There is no evidence, however, that Monnet had any knowledge of Deutsch or, for that matter, David Mitrany's functionalist theory, whereas Mitrany certainly knew of Monnet. See Lindseth, Peter L., ‘Transatlantic Functionalism: New Deal Models and European Integration’, Critical Analysis of Law, 2, 1 (2015), 83–105Google Scholar.

61 Memorandum de Monnet, 27 May 1919, Doc. 996; Hunter Miller, David, My Diary at the Conference of Paris, with Documents, vol. 9 (New York: Appeal Printing, 1924), 447–53Google Scholar, here 452.

62 Bösch, Frank, Die Adenauer-CDU. Gründung, Aufstieg und Krise einer Erfolgspartei 1945–1969 (Stuttgart: DVA, 2001), 195–235Google Scholar.

63 For a detailed prosopographical study of the High Authority (with detailed information of the background of High Authority officials) and the European Commission see Seidel, Katja, The Process of Politics in Europe: The Rise of European Elites and Supranational Institutions (London: Tauris Academic Studies, 2010)Google Scholar.

64 Allocution de M. Jean Monnet, Président de la Haute Autorité, à la première réunion du Comité Consultatif, CM1/1953 104, Historical Archives of the European Union; Kurzbericht über die Sitzung des Beratenden Ausschusses vom 21. Apr. 1953 im Rathaus von Luxembourg, um 11.45 Uhr, CM1/1953 107, Historical Archives of the European Union.

65 See Steffen, Rolf, ‘Förderung der Stahlforschung durch die Montanunion. Strukturen, Ereignisse, Zukunft’, in Rasch, Manfred and Düwell, Kurt, eds., Anfänge und Auswirkungen der Montanunion auf Europa: Die Stahlindustrie in Politik und Wirtschaft (Essen: Klartext, 2007), 113–32Google Scholar.

66 Witschke, Tobias, Gefahr für den Wettbewerb? Die Fusionskontrolle der Europäischen Gemeinschaft für Kohle und Stahl und die „Rekonzentration“ der Ruhrstahlindustrie 1950–1963 (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2009)Google Scholar.

67 European Coal and Steel Community, Sixth General Report on the Activities of the Community, vol. 2, 13 Apr. 1958, 98–9.

68 Lister, Louis, Europe's Coal and Steel Community. An Experiment in Economic Union (New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1960), 171.Google Scholar

69 Déclaration de M. Jean Monnet, Président de la Haute Autorité, devant le Comité Consultatif, 22 Apr. 1953, CM1/1953 107, Historical Archives of the European Union.

70 Barthel, Charles, ‘The 1966 European Steel Cartel and the Collapse of the ECSC High Authority’, in Guirao, Fernando, Lynch, Frances M.B. and Ramírez Pérez, Sigfrido M., eds., Alan S. Milward and a Century of European Change (Abingdon: Routledge, 2012), 333–50Google Scholar. For the broader political context see Bajon, Philip, Europapolitik „am Abgrund“. Die Krise des „leeren Stuhls“ 1965–66 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2012)Google Scholar.

71 Tsoulakis, Loukas and Strauss, Robert, ‘Community Policies on Steel 1974–1982: A Case of Collective Management’, in Mény, Yves and Wright, Vincent, eds., The Politics of Steel. Western Europe and the Steel Industry in the Crisis Years 1974–1984 (Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 1986), 186–21Google Scholar.

72 See Kaiser, Wolfram and Varsori, Antonio, eds., European Union History. Themes and Debates (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.