Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:46:12.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manufacturing a Consensus: Nazi Propaganda and the Building of a ‘National Community’ (Volksgemeinschaft)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2008

David Welch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The point has to be made at once that any attempt to quantify public reaction to Nazi propaganda is fraught with difficulties. Accurate measurement of the effectiveness of Nazi propaganda is weakened by the absence of public opinion surveys and the fact that, in a society that resorted so readily to coercions and terror, reported opinion did not necessarily reflect the true feelings and moods of the public, especially if these views were opposed to the regime. Nevertheless, to state that public opinion in the Third Reich ceased to exist is not strictly true. After the Nazi ‘seizure of power’ in 1933, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels stressed the importance of co-ordinating propaganda with other activities. In a dictatorship, propaganda must address itself to large masses of people and attempt to move them to a uniformity of opinion and action. But the Nazis also understood that propaganda is of little value in isolation. To some extent this explains why Goebbels impressed on all his staff at the Ministry of Popular Enlightenment and Propaganda the imperative necessity constantly to gauge public moods. Goebbels therefore regularly received (as did all the ruling élites) extraordinarily detailed reports from the Secret Police (SD reports) about the mood of the people and would frequently quote these in his diary. Hitler, too, was familiar with these reports, and his recorded determination to avoid increasing food prices at all costs for fear that this would undermine the regime's popularity suggests a political sensitivity to public opinion. To assure themselves of continued popular support was an unwavering concern of the Nazi leadership, and of Hitler and Goebbels in particular.

Type
Articles
Information
Contemporary European History , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Steinert, M. Cf. Hitlers Krieg und die Deutschen. Stimmung und Haltung der deutschen Bevölkerung im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Düsseldorf: Econ. Verlag, 1970), 43–4.Google Scholar

2 I have taken this phrase from Hiden, J. and Farquharson, J.Explaining Hitler's Germany (London: Batsford, 1989),52.Google Scholar However, I arrive at different conclusions than these authors.

3 See I. Kershaw's excellent summary, ‘How Effective was Nazi Propaganda?’ (thereafter Kershaw, ‘How Effective’), in Welch, D. ed., Nazi Propaganda.The Power and the Limitations (London: Routledge, 1983), 180–205.Google Scholar

4 For an analysis of völkisch thought still unsuperceded seeMosse, G. The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the third Reich (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1964)Google ScholarBaird, J. Cf. To Die for Germany. Heroes in the Nazi Pantheon (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana Universitty Press, 1990).Google Scholar

5 For a discussion of these issues see my contribution, ‘Goebbels, Götterdammerung, and the Deutsche Wochenschauen’, in Short, K. and Dolezel, S. eds, Hitler's Fall. The Newsreel Witness (London: Routledge, 1988), 80–100.Google Scholar

6Kershaw, Cf.‘How Effective’,189–91.Google Scholar

7 The agreement which was signed on 27 Nov. 1933 by Ley, Seldte (Ministry of Labour), Schmitt (Economics) and Hitler's representative for economic affairs, Keppler, can be found in Noakes, J. and Pridham, G. Nazism 1919–1945. A Documentary Reader (thereafter Noakes and Pridham, Nazism) (Exeter: University of Exeter, 1984), ii. 338–9.Google Scholar

8 Quoted in Schoenbaum, D.Hitler's Social Revolution. Class and Status in Nazi Germany (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1966), 82.Google Scholar

9 According to Nazi figures, in 1938 the Strength through Joy theatres were attended by 14 million, libraries numbered 5,260, sporting activities were attended by 22.5 million, and 10 million took advantage of State excursions. Quoted in Neumann, F.Behemoth. The Structure and Practice of National Socialism (London: Victor Gollanz, 1942), 426, n. 43.Google Scholar

10 Starcke, G.Die Deutsche Arbeitsfront (Berlin, 1940), 124,Google Scholar quoted in Noakes and Pridham, Nazism, 350.

11 See Mason, T. W.Arbeitklasse und Volksgemeinschaft (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1977);Google Scholaridem, Sozialpolitik im Dritten Reich (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1977);Google Scholaridem, ‘Labour in the Third Reich’, Past and Present, Vol. 33 (1966), 112–41;Google Scholaridem, ‘The Workers’ Opposition in Nazi Germany’, History Workshop Journal, No. 11 (Spring 1981), 120–37. Cf. with Kershaw's work on Bavaria, Popular Opinion and Political Dissent. Bavaria 1933–1945 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).

12 Deutschland – Berichte der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschland 1934–1940 (thereafter Sopade-Berichte), 7 vols (Frankfurt-am-Main, 1980), Vol. 5 (Feb. 1938), 175.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., Vol. 6 (July 1939), 757–78.

14 Ibid. (Feb. 1938), 172.

15 Ibid. (Apr. 1939), 489. For students who cannot read German, a very useful source is Noakes and Pridham, Nazism, who quote extensively from Sopade reports.

16 Guillebaud, C. W.The Economic Recovery of Nazi Germany 1933–1938 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939).Google ScholarGuillebaud, Cf.The Social Policy of Nazi Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1941).Google Scholar

17 For a penetrating empirical study of the relationship between capitalism and fascism see Turner, H. A.German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar An excellent account of the effects of the economic crisis on Nazi economic theory can be found in James, H. The German Slump. Politics and Economics 1924–1936 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar On the ‘primacy of politics’ approach to the Nazi economy see Mason, T. ‘The Primacy of Politics – Politics and Economics in National Socialist Germany’, in Turner, H. A. ed., Nazism and the Third Reich (New York: Quadrangle Books, 1972), 175–200.Google Scholar More general surveys can be found in Milward, A.The German Economy at War (London: Athlone Press, 1965);Google ScholarOvery, R.The Nazi Economic Recovery 1932–38 (London: Macmillan, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Völkischer Beobachter, 15 Sept. 1935.Google Scholar

19 For further details of the Nazis’ control of teachers and schools see Eilers, R.Die nationalsozialistische Schulpolitik. Ein Studie zur Funktion der Erziehung im totalitären Staat. Staat und Politik, Vol. 4 (Cologne, 1963),Google Scholar and Feiten, W.Der nationalsozialistische Lehrbund. Entwicklung und Organisation (Weinheim: Beltz, 1981).Google Scholar

20 Roberts, S.The House that Hitler Built (London: Methuen, 1937), 208.Google ScholarHeck, A Cf., A Child of Hitler: Germany in the Days when God Wore a Swastika (Colorado: Renaissance House, 1985).Google Scholar

21 For a detailed account of the ‘Edelweiss Pirates’ see Peukert, D.Die Edelweisspiraten Protest-bewegungen jugendlicher Arbeiter im Dritten Reich (Cologne: Bund Verlag, 1980);Google Scholar for a brief general discussion see idem, ‘Youth in the Third Reich’, in Bessel, R. ed., Life in the Third Reich (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), 25–40.Google Scholar See also Klönne, A.Jugend im Dritten Reich. Die Hitler–Jugend und ihre Gegner (Dusseldorf: Diederichs, 1982).Google Scholar

22 Cf. Sopade–Berichte, Vol. 1 (1934), 117–18; Vol. 2 (1935), 1374–6; vol. 5 (1938), 27.Google Scholar

23 After 1945, British educationalists undertook a critical assessment of the Weimar education system and came to the conclusion that, due to the lack of reconstruction on democratic principles, a strong class structure remained along nineteenth-century lines. It recognised that the Volksgemeinschaft had tried to pull down class barriers and that efforts had been made to curb extreme academic bias in favour of ‘character building’. Had it not been for the indoctrination of a perverse and unacceptable ideology (and for the establishment of a new arrogant élite) the principles of the Nazi social revolution would have found favour with British educational reformers. See my contribution, ‘Priming the Pump of German Democracy: “Re-education” Policy in Germany after the Second World War’Google Scholar, in Turner, I. ed., Reconstruction in Post-War Germany (Oxford: Berg and St Martin's Press, 1989), 215–39.Google Scholar

24 Sopade–Berichte, Vol. 1 (June 1934), 117.Google Scholar

25 One of the striking features to emerge from the oral history project directed by Lutz Niethammer on the experiences of the Ruhr workers was the stress on ‘normality’ and the manner in which even opponents of Nazism looked back favourably on ‘Strength through Joy’ and the planned leisure activities as positive, compensatory, features of the Nazi regime. Niethammer, L. ed., ‘Die Jahre weiss man nicht, wo man die heute hinsetzen soll.’ Faschismuserfahrungen im Ruhrgebeit (Berlin: Dietz, 1986).Google Scholar

26 Sopade–Berichte, Vol. 3 (1936), 683–4. Cf. ibid., Vol. 5 (1938), 697–8.