No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
‘Organising Talent and Disciplined Steadiness’: the German SPD as a Model for the British Labour Party in the 1920s?1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2008
Extract
In comparative Labour history there is a long tradition of adhering to a typology of labour movements which distinguishes south-western European, ‘Latin’ labour movements (France, Spain, Italy) from north-eastern European labour movements (Germany, Austria, Scandinavia, east and south-east Europe) and invokes a third category: Anglo-American labour movements. The British Labour Party is usually subsumed under this latter category, whereas the German SPD is regarded as the spiritual leader of the second. Insofar as these comparisons explicitly deal with the time before the First World War, their argument is indeed a strong one. After all, the SPD was the largest socialist party in the world before 1914, at a time when the Labour Party did not even allow individual membership. At least in its organisational strongholds, the SPD resembled a social movement providing for its members almost ‘from cradle to grave’. The Labour Party, by contrast, is often portrayed as a trade union interest group in parliament with no other purpose than electoral representation. Where the Labour Party avoided any ideological commitment before 1914, the SPD had at least theoretically adopted Marxism as its ideological bedrock after 1890.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996
References
2 For comparisons between the Labour Party and the SPD before 1914 stressing the differences between the two parties see particularly Geary, Dick, European Labour Politics from 1900 to the Depression (London: MacMillan, 1991), 9;CrossRefGoogle Scholaridem, ed., Labour and Socialist Movements in Europe Before 1914 (Oxford: Berg, 1989), 3;Google ScholarMitchell, Harvey and Steams, Peter, Workers and Protests. The European Labor Movement, the Working Classes and the Origins of Social Democracy 1890–1914 (Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock, 1971), 5.Google Scholar
3 Mommsen, Hans, ‘Zum Problem der vergleichenden Behandlung nationaler Arbeiterbewe-gungen am Beispiel Ost- und Südostmitteleuropas’, in: IWK, Vol. 15 (1979), 31.Google Scholar Also idem., ‘Arbeiterbewegung’, in Kemig, C. D., ed., Sowjetsystem und demokratische Gesellschaft. Eine vergleichende Enzyklopädie, Vol. 1 (Freiburg: Herder, 1966), 278.Google Scholar
4 Kendall, Walter, The Labour Movement in Europe (London: Lane, 1975), 3f.Google Scholar
5 Hodge, Carl Cavanagh, ‘The Trammels of Tradition: Social Democratic Parties in Britain, France and Germany 1863–1937’, PhD thesis (University of London, 1987), 49.Google Scholar
6 Labour Organizer, April/May 1923, 5. See also McKibbin, Ross, The Evolution of the Labour Party, 1910–1924 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
7 The difficulties of the Labour movement in London in gaining much electoral success before 1914 have been well described. See Thompson, Paul, Socialists, Liberals and Labour. The Struggle for London, 1885–1914 (London: Routledge, 1967).Google Scholar See also Tanner, Duncan, Political Change and the Labour Party, 1900–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 162–80.Google Scholar
8 Labour Party archive, files on LLP, leaflet, 18 Jan. 1918, signed by Herbert Morrison.
9 Donoughue, B. and Jones, G. W., Herbert Morrison (thereafter Donoughue and Jones, Morrison) (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1973), 75f.Google Scholar
10 Labour Party Archive, circular of the LLP, May 1933, files on LLP.
11 For London, Cheshire and the West Midlands see Labour Organiser, March 1921, 17f. For see Lancashire, Labour Organiser, Jan. 1921, 8.Google Scholar
12 Labour Organiser, June 1924, 1.
13 Morrison, Herbert, ‘London's Labour Majority’, The Labour Magazine, Vol. 8 (1929/1930), 68.Google Scholar
14 Donoughue, and Jones, , Morrison, 32–4.Google Scholar
15 Morrison, Herbert, An Autobiography (London: Odhams, 1960), 77.Google Scholar
16 Organization Points of the LLP, no. 1, 4 Nov. 1920.
17 Annual Report of the E. C. of the LLP, 1926/27, 24.
18 For a visit of MacDonald to the Kiel SPD in 1909 see, for example, Vorwärts, no. 192, 19 Aug. 1909. For his close relationship with Eduard Bernstein see also Marquand, David, Ramsay MacDonald (London: Cape, 1977), 164.Google Scholar For Henderson's pre-war visit see G. N. Barnes and Arthur Henderson, Unemployment in Germany, publ. by the Labour Party (Westminster 1908). For Keir Hardie see Morgan, Kenneth, Keir Hardie (thereafter Morgan, Hardie) (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1975), 181f.Google Scholar
19 Brailsford, H. N., ‘Introduction’, in Braunthal, Julius, In Search of the Millennium (London: Gollancz, 1945), 8.Google Scholar
20 Vorwärts, no. 266, 12 Nov. 1911, reports on a visit of Ben Tillett.
21 Citrine, Walter, Men at Work (London: Hutchinson, 1964), 340.Google Scholar
22 Gustafson, Bo, Marxismus und Revisionismus. Eduard Bernstein's Kritik des Marxismus und ihre ideengeschichtlichen Voraussetzungen (Frankfurt a.M.: Europäische Verlagsanstalk, 1972);Google Scholar Helmut Hirsch, Der ‘Fabier’ Eduard Bernstein. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des evolutionären Sozialismus (Bonn: J. W. H. Dietz Nachf., 1979); Fletcher, Roger, ‘Bernstein in Britain: Revisionism and Foreign Affairs’, International History Review, Vol. 1 (1979), 349–75;CrossRefGoogle Scholaridem, ‘British Radicalism and German Revisionism: the Case of Bernstein, Eduard, International History Review, Vol. 4 (1982), 339–70;Google ScholarFrei, Herbert, Fabianismus und Bemsteinscher Revisionismus, 1884–1900. Eine ideologie-komparatistische Studie über wissenschaftstheoretische, philosophische, ökonomische, staatstheoretische und revolutionstheoretische Aspekte der Marxschen, Fabischen und Bernsteinschen Theorie (Berlin: Peter Lang, 1979).Google Scholar
23 International Institute for Social History (thereafter, IISG), Amsterdam, Bernstein papers, D 127, letter from Davidson, John, branch secretary of the ILP Edinburgh to Bernstein, 23 Jan. 1901.Google Scholar
24 Rep. in Vorwärts, 26 Sept. 1916, 1: Keir Hardie to Bernstein, 17 May 1914.
25 See, for example, Bernstein, Eduard, ‘Probleme der britischen Arbeiterpartei’, Sozialistische Monatshefie (thereafter SM), Vol. 19 (1913), 205–16Google Scholar; idem, ‘Vom Geist des englischen Sozialismus’, SM, Vol. 19 (1913), 718–28.Google Scholar
26 Beer, Max, History of British Socialism, 2 vols (London: G. Bell & Sons, 1919);Google Scholar for his correspondence with Laski and Tawney, see: IISG, Beer papers.
27 Wertheimer, Egon, Portrait of the Labour Party (thereafter Wertheimer, Portrait) (London: G. P. Puttnam's Sons, 1929).Google Scholar Also MacDonald, Ramsay, Die auswärtige Politik der englischen Arbeiterpartei, transl. and ed. Wertheimer, Egon (Hamburg: Vorwärts, 1924).Google Scholar For the correspondence of Wertheimer with the Social Democratic Party leader Hermann Müller, see Archiv für soziale Demokratie, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Bonn, Müller papers, box 3.
28 London School of Economics (thereafter LSE), Coll. Misc. 686: letter MacDonald to John, 18 Jan. 1911.
29 LSE, Coll. Misc. 686: letter Elvin to John, 3 June 1910.
30 LSE, Coll. Misc. 686: letter Pugh to John, 18 June 1910.
31 25 Years of the Woolwich Labour Party, p. 10.
32 The Labour Organiser, Jan. 1923, 8f.
33 Macintyre, Stuart, ‘Socialism, the Unions and the Labour Party after 1918’, in SSLH, Bulletin 31, (1975), III.Google Scholar
34 Holford, John, Reshaping Labour: Organization, Work and Politics – Edinburgh in the Great War and After (London: Croom Helm, 1988).Google Scholar
35 The Labour Organiser (Dec. 1931), 231. See also Shinwell, Emmanuel, ‘Ain't It Grand to be Temporarily Dead?’, The Labour Magazine, Vol. 11 (1932/1933), 172f.Google Scholar
36 Labour Party Archive, Darlington Labour Party Minutes, 30 March 1928.
37 For the thriving sub-organisations based on street captains and pay-evenings in local pubs, see for instance the local study on Düsseldorf by Nolan, Mary, Social Democracy and Society: Working Class Radicalism in Düsseldorf, 1890–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 128f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 Fricke, Dieter, Die deutsche Arbeiterbewegung, 1869–1914. Ein Handbuch über ihre Organisation und Tätigkeit im Klassenkampf (thereafter Fricke, Handbuch) (Berlin: Dietz, 1976), 234f.Google Scholar See also the classic studies of Robert, Michels, ‘Die deutsche Sozialdemokratie: Parteimitgliedschaft und soziale Zusammensetzung’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Vol. 23, n.f. 5 (1906), 471–556Google Scholar, and idem, Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie. Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens, first pub. 1911 (repr. of the second ed., Stuttgart: Kröner, 1957). For a more recent local study see Wickham, James, ‘The Working-class Movement in Frankfurt am Main during the Weimar Republic’, PhD thesis (University of Sussex, 1979), 27f.Google Scholar
39 Comfort, R., Revolutionary Hamburg. Labor Politics in the Early Weimar Republic (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1966), 135.Google Scholar
40 Wertheimer, , Portrait, 23 off.Google Scholar
41 Paetau, R., Konfrontation oder Kooperation. Arbeiterbewegung und bürgerliche Gesellschafi im ländlichen Schleswig-Holstein und in der Industriestadt Kiel, 1900–1925 (Berlin: Wachholtz, 1985), 67.Google Scholar For a low turnout at membership assemblies see also Zeitz, Alfred, Zur Geschichte der Stadt Brandenburg vor dem 1. Weltkrieg (Potsdam: Berzirksheimatsmuseum, 1965), 15f.Google Scholar For increasing apathy in local Social Democratic parties like Dortmund see also evidence cited in Fricke, , Handbuch, i. 287.Google Scholar
42 Sonnenmann, Paul, ‘Von der Kleinarbeit in der Partei’, Der Weg, Vol. 2 (1928), 70.Google ScholarDer Weg was largely a journal for Berlin party functionaries.
43 Protokoll des sozialdemokratischen Parteitages 1924 (Berlin: Vorwärts, 1924), 143.
44 Scheidemann, Philipp, Memoirs of a Social Democrat (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1929), i. 48f.Google Scholar
45 Berg, Werner, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft in Deutschland und Großbritannien im Übergang zum ‘Organisierten Kapitalismus’. Untemehmer, Angestellte, Arbeiter und Staat im Steinkohlebergbau des Ruhrgebietes und von Südwales, 1850–1914 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1984), 810.Google Scholar Also Ritter, G. A., ‘Die Sozialdemokratie im deutschen Kaiserreich in sozialgeschichtlicher Perspektive’, Historische Zeitschrift, Vol. 243 (1986), 321 and 344f.Google Scholar For the failure of the SPD to bind new voters to the part in the countryside even after 1918 see Winkler, Jürgen, ’Die soziale Basis der sozialistischen Parteien in Deutschland 1912–1924’, Archiv für Sozialgeschichte, Vol. 29 (1989), 137–71.Google Scholar
46 Rohe, Karl, ‘Political Alignments and Re-alignments in the Ruhr, 1867–1987: Continuity and Change of Political Traditions in an Industrial Region’, in Rohe, Karl (ed.), Elections, Parties and Political Traditions. Social Foundations of German Parties and Party Systems, 1867–1987 (New York: Berg, 1990), 107–44.Google Scholar
47 For a good example see Abraham, Hartwig, (ed.), Geschichte der Biberacher Arbeiterbewegung und Sozialdemokratie (Biberach: Local Social Democratic Party, 1983).Google Scholar
48 Labour Organiser, June 1922, 18.
49 Labour Organiser, March 1924, 5.
50 Lansbury, George, Miracle of Fleet Street (London: Labour Publishing Co., 1925), 8.Google Scholar
51 Labour Organiser, September 1923, 2.
52 Morrison, Herbert, ‘London's Big Push’, London News, June 1925, 1. For a similar campaign in Coventry in 1924 see George Hodgkinson, Sent to Coventry (London: Maxwell, 1971), 83.Google Scholar
53 Labour Organiser, Oct. 1920, 1f.
54 Annual Report of the E. C. of the LLP, 1930/31, 15.
55 Labour Party Archives, Minutes of the Organizational Sub-Committee, 27 Jan. 1932.
56 Loreck, Jochen, Wit man früher Sozialdemokrat wurde: das Kommunkationsverhalten und die Konzeption der sozialistischen Parteipublizistik durch August Bebel (Bonn: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft, 1977), 13–15.Google Scholar Also Saerbeck, Werner, Die Presse der deutschen Sozialdemokratie under dem Sozialistengesetz (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus 1985).Google Scholar
57 Fricke, , Handbuch, i. 495–646;Google Scholar see generally Koszyk, Kurt, Die Presse der deutschen Sozialdemokratie. Eine Bibliographie (Hanover: Verlag für Literatur und Zeitgeschehen, 1966).Google Scholar
58 Report of the 1922 TUC conference (London, 1922), 95.
59 IISG, SAI files 950/1, 5.
60 LSE, Coll. Misc. 686: letter Hardie to John, 5 Nov. 1910.
61 Morgan, , Hardie, 5182.Google Scholar
62 For the local Labour Party press see Hopkin, Deian, ‘The Labour Party Press’, in Brown, K. D., ed., The First Labour Party, 1906–1914 (London: Croom Helm, 1985), 105–28.Google Scholar For an indication of its importance in the 1920s, see also Henderson, W. W., ‘The Press and Labour’, Labour Organiser, April 1922, 7.Google Scholar For earlier efforts see Jones, Aled, ‘Local Labour Newspapers’, Bulletin of the Society for the Study of Labour History, no. 44 (1982), 7f.Google Scholar
63 For the Woolwich Pioneer, see Thomson, P., ‘London Working-class Politics and the Formation of the London Labour Party 1885–1914’, PhD thesis (University of Oxford, 1963), 441f. and 456f.Google Scholar For the Birmingham Town Crier see Chamberlain, W. J., ‘The Provincial Labour Press Problem. How it May Be Solved’, Labour Organiser, June 1921, 24.Google Scholar
64 Vorwärts, no. 44, 22 Feb. 1906.
65 The SPD's sub-culture has been rather well analysed by now. See, for example, the overviews of Lidtke, Vernon L., The Alternative Culture. Socialist Labor in Imperial Germany (thereafter Lidtke, Alternative Culture) (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google ScholarGroschopp, Horst, Zwischen Bierabend und Bildungsverein. Zur Kulturarbeit in der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung vor 1914, 2nd ed. (Berlin [O]: Dietz, 1987).Google ScholarGuttsmann, Willi L., Workers' Culture in Weimar Germany between Tradition and Commitment (New York: Berg, 1990);Google Scholarvan der Will, Wilfried and Burns, Rob, Arbeiterkulturbewegung in der Weimarer Republik (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1982).Google Scholar
66 Russell, B., Diary of a Winter spent in Berlin (unpubl., 15 Nov. 1895, LSE, Coll. Misc. 296.Google Scholar
67 Paton, John, Left Turn (London: Secker & Warburg, 1936), 342.Google Scholar
68 Ibid., 350. For similar sentiments of admiration see Brockway, Fenner, Inside the Left (London, Allen & Unwin, 1942), p. 134 and p. 160.Google Scholar
69 Ibid., 353.
70 Labour Organiser, Oct. 1930, 189.
71 IGA/ZPL, (IML), Thüringisches Ministerium des Inneren, St. 17/302, 50f.
72 Annual Report of the EC of the LLP, 1928/29, 10.
73 The Labour Organiser and the Labour Leader reported regularly about these events.
74 Arbeiterführer für Leipzig und Umgebung. Nachschlagewerk, Vol. 11, ed. Richard Lipinski(Leipzig: Leipzig SPD, 1909), 70.
75 Annual Report of the EC of the LLP, 1931/32, 12. Also William Howard, ‘How to Run a Speakers' Class’, The Labour Organiser, April 1925, 10f.
76 von Saldern, Adelheid, ‘Arbeiterkulturbewegung in Deutschland in der Zwischenkriegszeit’ (thereafter von Saldem, ‘Arbeiterkulturbewegung’) in Boll, Friedhelm, (ed.), Arbeiterkulturen zwischen Alltag und Politik (Wien: Europa-Verlag, 1986), 44;Google ScholarNitschke, Wilhelm, ‘Zur Schulung der Funktionäre’, SM, Vol. 19, no. 2 (1913), 728–32.Google Scholar
77 Marwick, W. H., ‘International Adult Education’, Labour Magazine, Vol. 5 (1926/1927), 402f.Google Scholar
78 Amott, John, ‘Factories and Footlights. Leeds Industrial Theatre’, The Labour Magazine, Vol. 1 (1922/1923), 489–91.Google Scholar
79 For socialist theatre groups in Britain, see Thomas, Tom, ‘The Workers' Theatre Movement: Memoirs and Documents’, with an editorial introduction by Raphael Samuel, HWJ, no. 4 (1977), 102–42.Google Scholar Also Lehberger, Reiner, ‘Internationale Verbindungen und Beeinflussungen des sozialistischen Theaters im England der dreißiger Jahre’, Das Argument Special Vol. 29 (1978), 67–79.Google Scholar
80 Jones, Stephen G. ‘The British Labour Movement and Working Class Leisure, 1918–1939’, PhD thesis (University of Manchester, 1983), 276f.Google Scholar See also the published version of his thesis, Workers at Play. A Social and Economic History of Leisure, 1918–1939 (thereafter Jones, Workers) (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986).
81 See the Annual Reports of the EC of the LLP which throughout the 1920s and 1930s carried regular reports about the development of London Labour Party choirs.
82 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 20e: letter Jagger to Ollenhauer, 8 May 1921.
83 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 24a: letter from A. F. Knights to the secretariat of the Youth International, 21 March 1921.
84 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 24g: letter from Ollenhauer to Henderson, 9 Feb. 1922, and reply from Gillies to Ollenhauer, 25 March 1922.
85 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 24g: letter from Gillies to Ollenhauer, 23 Oct. 1922.
86 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 24g: letter from Gillies to Ollenhauer, 25 Oct. 1922.
87 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 25b: letter from Saward to Ollenhauer, 31 July 1922, and reply Ollenhauer to Saward, 2 Aug. 1922.
88 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 37a: letter from Ollenhauer to Pendry, 19 April 1923.
89 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 357/5: letter from Felix Kyora to the Bureau of the Socialist Youth International, 22 Aug. 1931.
90 IISG, papers of the Socialist Youth International, no. 240: report of the Bureau of the Socialist Youth International, May 1926.
91 Labour Organiser, Aug. 1923, 11.
92 Williams, Paul, ‘Give Young Britain its Chance’, Labour Magazine, Vol. 10 (1931–2), 508.Google Scholar
93 Lidtke, , Alternative Culture, 168.Google Scholar
94 Jones, , Workers, 87–108.Google Scholar
95 Saldern, von, ‘Arbeiterkulturbewegung’, 46.Google Scholar
96 For a more detailed account of the reasons for the Labour Party's difficulties in building up as massive an organisational machine as that of the SPD, see Berger, Stefan, The British Labour Party and the German Social Democrats 1900–1931. A Comparative Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), ch. 3, 70–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar