Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:22:28.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Texts, Bodies, Multimodality: Dance Literacy in Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2015

Abstract

Crossing between texts, bodies, and the senses, dance literacies bring fresh perspectives on how new literacies can function, especially non-alphabetic or non-text-based literacies. Reading and writing in an expanded understanding of literacy are interpretive means of interacting with texts, of embedding and discerning meaning, of making sense of movement or choreographic information, of composing and performing, and of creating documentation and archive. Makers and viewers of dances act as readers, and writers, and authors. These roles are permeable in dance literacy, shifting with the context of the dance phenomenon or artistic practice. This paper engages with the dance practices of two dance companies to explore issues of shared-authorship, documentation, multimodality, body-text relationships, and reader-writer permeability: the Bebe Miller Company during their creation of A History and RikudNetto, who composes through Eshkol-Wachman Movement Notation. What literacy events and practices are present in the studio? What range of written literacies are used and how? Where and how were these literacies learned? In what ways might they cross the so-called literacy-orality divide? Drawing from questions and frameworks of the New Literacy Studies, this paper invites a critical look at dance literacy in context.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Rachael Riggs Leyva 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Akinnaso, F. Niyi. 2001. “Literacy and Individual Consciousness.” In Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook, edited by Cushman, Ellen, Kintgen, Eugene R., Kroll, Barry M., and Rose, Mike, 138–55. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.Google Scholar
Clanchy, Michael T. (1979) 1993. From Memory to Written Record: England, 1066–1307, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. 1973. “Literacy Versus Non-Literacy: The Great Divide.” In Modes of Thought: Essays on Thinking in Western and Non-Western Societies, edited by Finnegan, Ruth and Horton, Robin, 112–44. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. 1988. Literacy and Orality: Studies in the Technology of Communication. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. 2006. “Not by Words Alone: Reclothing the ‘Oral.’” In Technology, Literacy, and the Evolution of Society: Implications of the Work of Jack Goody, edited by Olson, David R. and Cole, Michael, 265–87. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. (1979) 1987. The Literacy Myth: Cultural Integration and Social Structure in the Nineteenth-Century City. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, and Watt, Ian. 1968. “The Consequences of Literacy.” In Literacy Traditional Societies, edited by Goody, Jack, 2768. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, William V. 1989. Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Angie. 2012. Interview with the author, July 18.Google Scholar
Heath, Shirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Riggs Leyva, Rachel. 2015. “Dance Literacy in the Studio: Partnering Movement Texts and Residual Texts.” Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Tirza, and Al-Dor, Nira. 2011. The Voices of Moving Landscape. Tel Aviv, Israel: Mofet Institute: Research Center for Movement Notation and Dance.Google Scholar
Street, Brian. 1993. Cross-Cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar