Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-sl7kg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-09T02:47:47.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tanac Dances and Migrations on the Island of Krk, Croatia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2013

Tvrtko Zebec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis and the interpretation of the dance style of today's islanders have revealed the differences that likely emerged as a consequence of past migrations, particularly those by large groups moving to the western part of the island at the mid-fifteenth century. The conception of themselves, of neighbors as Others, the need for mutual differentiation, and the creation of linguistic and other symbolical borders developed on the island over a prolonged period of time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Congress on Research in Dance Conference Proceedings , Volume 39 , supplement S1: Choreographies Of Migration: Patterns Of Global Mobility , 2007 , pp. 225 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Cohen, Anthony P. 1985. The Symbolic Construction of Community. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čapo Žmegač, Jasna. 1997. “Objektivni i subjektivni čimbenici identifikacije sa zajeanicom.” Etnološka tribina 20: 69—82.Google Scholar
Čapo Žmegač, Jasna. 2002. Srijemski Hrvati: etnološka studija migracije, identifikacije i interakcije. Zagreb: Durieux.Google Scholar
Čapo Žmegač, Jasna. 2003. “Dva lokaliteta, dvije države, dva doma: transmigracija hrvatskih ekonomskih migranata u Münchenu.” Národná umjetnost: Croatian Journal of Ethnology and Folklore Research 40, (2): 117–31.Google Scholar
Kaeppler, Adrienne. 1999. “The Mystique of Fieldwork.” In Dance in the Field: Theory, Methods and Issues in Dance Ethnography, edited by Buckland, Theresa J., 13–25. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaić, Nada. 1970. “Knezovi Frankapani kao krčka vlastela.” Krčki zbornik 1: 125–80.Google Scholar
Milčetié, Ivan. 1884. “Otok Krk.” Viestnik hrvatskog arheološkog društva 6.Google Scholar
Skok, Petar. 1950. Slavenstvo i romanstvo najadranskim otocima. Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija zna-nosti i umjetnosti.Google Scholar
Snyder, Allegra Fuller. 1989. “Levels of Event Patterns: A Theoretical Model Applied to the Yaqui Easter Ceremonies.” In The Dance Event: A Complex Phenomenon, edited by Torp, Lisbet, 1–20. Copenhagen: ICTM Study Group on Ethnochoreology.Google Scholar
Žie Rokov, Ivan. 1976. “Naseljavanje Dubašnice i Poljica u 15. st.” Krčki zborník 7: 183–91.Google Scholar