Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T16:20:29.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Support and Following: Re-Visiting Movement Choirs and Public Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2016

Yvonne Hardt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, the theorization of dance as a critical and political practice has focused on its “resisting” qualities. “Withholding” or “arresting” are terms used to qualify dance as a means for questioning economic and artistic practices. This paper seeks to problematize such a view both by pondering the question of how to conceptualize acting bodies in forming political spaces and by grounding this discussion in a historical comparison. I will re-visit and question my previous research on movement choirs, and propose that the notion of supporting, transmitting, and sharing are strategies commensurately significant with choreographies of protest.

Type
Research Article
Information
Congress on Research in Dance Conference Proceedings , Volume 2016 , Fall 2016 , pp. 198 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Yvonne Hardt 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Brandstetter, Gabriele. 2007. “Dance as Culture of Knowledge. Body Memory and the Challenge of Theoretical Knowledge.” In Knowledge in Motion. Perspectives of Artistic and Scientific Research in Dance, edited by Gehm, Sabine, Husemann, Pirrko, and von Wilcke, Katharina, 37–48. Translated by von Arps-Aubert, Bettina. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Rendall, Steven. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dörr, Evelyn. 2008. Rudolf Laban. The Dancer of the Crystal. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Foellmer, Susanne. 2009. Am Rand der Körper. Inventuren des Unabgeschlossenen im zeitgenössischen Tanz. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1993. Dance as Text: Ideologies of the Baroque Body. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2002. The Work of Dance. Labor, Movement and Identity in the 1930s. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Gleisner, Martin. 1928. Tanz für alle. Von der Gymnastik zum Gemeinschaftstanz. Leipzig, Germany: Hesse & Becker.Google Scholar
Hardt, Yvonne. 2003. “Relational Movement Patterns: The Diversity of Movement Choirs and Their Social Potential in the Weimar Republic.” Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference at the University of Limerick, June 26–29.Google Scholar
Hardt, Yvonne. 2004. Politische Körper. Ausdruckstanz, Choreographien des Protests und die Arbeiterkulturbewegung in der Weimarer Republik. Münster, Germany: Lit.Google Scholar
Jackson, Shannon. 2011. Social Works. Performing Art, Supporting Publics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, Gabriele, and Noeth, Sandra. 2011. “Introduction.” In Emerging Bodies: The Performance of Worldmaking in Dance and Choreography, edited by Klein, Gabriele and Noeth, Sandra, 7–14. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Knust, Albrecht. 1932. “Die Quellen des neuen Laientanzes.” Der Tanz 5(3): 12–13.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André. 2006. Exhausting Dance. Performance and the Politics of Movement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André. 2013. “From Partaking to Initiating: Leadingfollowing as Dance's (a-Personal) Political Singularity.” In Dance, Politics and Co-Immunity, edited by Siegmund, Gerald and Hölscher, Stefan, 21–38. Zürich: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André, and Banes, Sally. 2007. “Introduction: The Performance of the Senses.” In The Senses in Performance, edited by Lepecki, André and Banes, Sally, 1–7. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loesch, Ilse. 1932. “Kinder im neuen Geist.” Der Tanz 5(9): 4–5.Google Scholar
Manning, Erin. 2009. “The Elasticity of the Almost.” In Planes of Composition: Dance, Theory and the Global, edited by Lepecki, André and Joy, Jenn, 107–122. London: Seagull Books.Google Scholar
Manning, Erin. 2014. “Do We Know What a Body Can Do? #1.” In Wissen wir, was ein Körper vermag?: Rhizomatische Körper in Religion, Kunst,Philisophie, edited by Böhler, Arno, Kruschkova, Krassimira, and Granzer, Susanne V., 11–21. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves. Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2010. “Kritik als hegemoniale Intervention.” In Kunst der Kritik, edited by Mennel, Birgit, Nowotny, Stefan, and Raunig, Gerald, 33–45. Wien, Germany: Turia + Kant.Google Scholar
Siegmund, Gerald. 2006. Abwesenheit: Eine performative Ästhetik des Tanzes. William Forsythe, Jérôme Bel, Xavier Le Roy, Meg Stuart. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Siegmund, Gerald, and Hölscher, Stefan. 2013. “Introduction.” In Dance, Politics & Co-Immunity, edited by Siegmund, Gerald and Hölscher, Stefan, 7–18. Zürich: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
Stern, Martin. 2010. Stil-Kulturen. Performative Konstellationen von Technik, Spiel und Risiko in neuen Sportpraktiken. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar