Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T17:45:47.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Panelist Question and Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2013

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Eeva Anttila (to Sue Stinson): One thing that comes to my mind is the conception/theory of learning that you currently feel most connected to. Could you clarify that? Is your conception in conflict with the learning objectives discourse that you have to deal with, and if yes, how so? Could you use some theoretical references to overcome this kind of demand that you are subjected to? For instance, constructivist learning theory is based on the idea that everyone learns different things, based on their previous experiences etc.

Type
Panel: Critical Issues in Pedagogy and Research: Perspectives on Dance Education Theory and Practice
Information
Congress on Research in Dance Conference Proceedings , Volume 41 , supplement S1: Global Perspectives On Dance Pedagogy: Research And Practice , 2009 , pp. 210 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Guba, Egon, and Lincoln, Yvonna. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kotilainen, Sirkku. 2001. Mediakultturin Haasteita Opettajankoulutukselle [Media Culture as a Challenge for Teacher Education]. Ph.D. University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Kotilainen, Sirkku. 2009. “What's Up? A Brief Overview of Contemporary Youth Cultures.” Presentation at the Kedja Seminar, Kuopio, Finland, June 15.Google Scholar
Niemi, Hannele. 1996. “Effectiveness of Teacher Education: A Theoretical Framework of Communicative Evaluation and the Design of a Finnish Research Project.” In Effectiveness of Teacher Education: New Challenges and Approaches to Evaluation, edited by Niemi, H. and Tirri, K., 11–32. Tampere: University of Tampere, Department of Teacher Education.Google Scholar
Parviainen, Jaana, ed. 2006. Kollektiivinen Asiantuntijuus [Collective Expertise]. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Schön, Donald. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. Svi, Latham, Kathie, and Ross, Sabrina, eds. 2006. The Institution of Education. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Stinson, Susan W. 1985. “Piaget for Dance Educators: A Theoretical Study.” Dance Research Journal 17 (1): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinson, Susan W. 2007. “Issues in Early Childhood Dance Education Research.” In Focus on Dance Education: Building Community, edited by Risner, Doug and Anderson, Jon, 183–89. Silver Springs, MD: National Dance Education Organization.Google Scholar