No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Decoding the Modern Practice of Bharatanatyam
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2013
Abstract
As the classical Indian dance form Bharatanatyam globalizes, it suffers under the gravitas of “unbroken tradition.” To numerically characterize tradition in contemporary India, surveys were administered to 212 practitioners on execution, values, knowledge, and pedagogy. Statistical analysis revealed extensive diversity, lack of a consistent core, and fundamental drivers of variation.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Congress on Research in Dance Conference Proceedings , Volume 40 , supplement S1: Dance Studies and Global Feminisms , 2008 , pp. 140 - 150
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2008
References
Works Cited
Erdman, Joan L. 1997. “Who Remembers Uday Shankar?” Revision of paper presented at the annual conference of the Society of Dance History Scholars, Barnard College, New York, June 21. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from <http://www.danceadvance.org/03archives/shankar/index.html>..>Google Scholar
Gewertz, Ken. 2006. “The Transformations of an Itinerant Mind.” Harvard Gazette, February 16. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from <http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2006/02.16/03-erspamer.html>..>Google Scholar
Guhan, S., trans. 1991. Bala on Bharatanatyam. Sruti 203. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from <http://www.sruti.com/downloads/What%20is%20Bharatanatyam.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Keshaviah, A. 2007. “‘This’ or ‘That’: The Unbearable Burden of Binaries.” Pulse Dance (Spring): 26–27.Google Scholar
Koppell, Jonathan, and Steen, Jennifer. 2004. “The Effects of Ballot Position on Election Outcomes.” Journal of Politics 66 (1): 267–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhachari. 1998. “Rhythm in Dance.” In Natya Kala Conference '97: The Joy of Dance. Chennai: Chidambaram Academy of Performing Arts.Google Scholar
O'Shea, Janet. 1998. “‘Traditional’ Indian Dance and the Making of Interpretive Communities.” Asian Theatre Journal 15 (1): 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, Janet. 2007. At Home in the World: Bharata Natyam on the Global Stage. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Samson, L. 1998. “Then and Now.” In Natya Kala Conference '97: The Joy of Dance. Chennai: Chidambaram Academy of Performing Arts.Google Scholar
Sivanandam, K. P. 2003. “Tradition of the Thanjavur Brothers.” In Maraynduvaraum Marabugal, 20–23. Chennai: Tapasya Kala Sampradaya.Google Scholar
Soneji, Davesh. 2006. “No More Nautches in Poodoocottah: Colonial Modernity, Memory and the Devadasi Dance Tradition of the Viralimalai Murukan Temple.” Paper presented at the Tamil Studies Conference, University of Toronto, May 11–14, <http://tamil.berkeley.edu/Tamil%20Conference%202005/absio.htm>..Additional+Works+Consulted>Google Scholar
Kalton, Graham. 1983. Introduction to Survey Sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, David, and Cheng, Kuan-Hsing. 1996. Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nandikeswara, . 1997. Abhinaya Darpanam. Translated by P. S. R. Apparao. Hyderabad: Natyamala.Google Scholar
Nandikeswara, 2007. Dance Gestures: Mirror of Expression from Abhinaya Darpanam. Translated by Ramachandrasekhar, P.. Mumbai: Giri Trading Agency.Google Scholar
Rangacharya, Adya, trans. 2003. The Natyasastra. 4th ed.New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Sarabhai, , Mrinalini, . 1981. Understanding Bharatanatyam. 3rd ed.Ahmedabad: Darpana Academy of Performing Arts.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, Leela, and Pasricha, Avinash. 2002. Indian Classical Dance: Tradition in Transition. New Delhi: Roli Books.Google Scholar