Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T20:48:06.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tachikawa's second conjecture, derived recollements, and gendo-symmetric algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2024

Hongxing Chen
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences & Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies, Capital Normal University, 100048 Beijing, P. R. China [email protected]
Ming Fang
Affiliation:
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, P. R. China [email protected] School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, P. R. China
Changchang Xi
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, 100048 Beijing P. R. China [email protected] School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shaanxi Normal University, 710119 Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China

Abstract

Tachikawa's second conjecture for symmetric algebras is shown to be equivalent to indecomposable symmetric algebras not having any nontrivial stratifying ideals. The conjecture is also shown to be equivalent to the supremum of stratified ratios being less than $1$, when taken over all indecomposable symmetric algebras. An explicit construction provides a series of counterexamples to Tachikawa's second conjecture from each (potentially existing) gendo-symmetric algebra that is a counterexample to Nakayama's conjecture. The results are based on establishing recollements of derived categories and on constructing new series of algebras.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. The publishing rights in this article are licensed to Foundation Compositio Mathematica under an exclusive licence

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

In memory of Professor Hiroyuki Tachikawa (1930–2022)

References

Auslander, M., Representation dimension of Artin algebras, Queen Mary College Mathematics Notes (Queen Mary College, 1971).Google Scholar
Auslander, M., Platzeck, I. M. and Todorov, G., Homological theory of idempotent ideals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 332 (1992), 667692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beilinson, A. A., Bernstein, J. and Deligne, P., Faisceaux pervers, Asterisque 100 (1982), 5171.Google Scholar
Chen, H. X. and Koenig, S., Ortho-symmetric modules, Gorenstein algebras, and derived equivalences, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2016 (2016), 69797037.Google Scholar
Chen, H. X. and Xi, C. C., Recollements of derived categories, II: Additive formulas of algebraic $K$-groups, Preprint (2012), arXiv:1212.1879v2.Google Scholar
Chen, H. X. and Xi, C. C., Dominant dimensions, derived equivalences and tilting modules, Israel J. Math. 215 (2016), 349395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. X. and Xi, C. C., Higher algebraic $K$-theory of ring epimorphisms, Algebr. Represent. Theory 19 (2016), 13471367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. X. and Xi, C. C., Recollements of derived categories, III: Finitistic dimensions, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 95 (2017), 633658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. X. and Xi, C. C., Homological theory of orthogonal modules, Preprint (2022), 1–40, arXiv:2208.14712.Google Scholar
Cline, E., Parshall, B. and Scott, L., Finite dimensional algebras and highest weight categories, J. Reine Angew. Math. 391 (1988), 277291.Google Scholar
Cline, E., Parshall, B. and Scott, L., Stratifying endomorphism algebras, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 124, no. 591 (American Mathematical Society, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Peña, J. A. and Xi, C. C., Hochschild cohomology of algebras with homological ideals, Tsukuba J. Math. 30 (2006), 6180.Google Scholar
Dugger, D. and Shipley, B., $K$-theory and derived equivalences, Duke Math. J. 124 (2004), 587617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, M. and Koenig, S., Endomorphism algebras of generators over symmetric algebras, J. Algebra 332 (2011), 428433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, M. and Koenig, S., Gendo-symmetric algebras, canonical comultiplication, bar cocomplexes and dominant dimension, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 368 (2016), 50375055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W. and Xi, C. C., Derived equivalences and stable equivalences of Morita type, I, Nagoya Math. J. 200 (2010), 107152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W. and Xi, C. C., Derived equivalences for $\Phi$-Auslander-Yoneda algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 365 (2013), 56815711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyama, O., Auslander correspondence, Adv. Math. 210 (2007), 5182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyama, O. and Solberg, Ø., Auslander-Gorenstein algebras and precluster tilting, Adv. Math. 326 (2018), 200240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerner, O. and Yamagata, K., Morita algebras, J. Algebra 382 (2013), 185202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q. H. and Yang, D., Blocks of group algebras are derived simple, Math. Z. 272 (2012), 913920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, B., The classification of algebras by dominant dimension, Canad. J. Math. 20 (1968), 398409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, T., On algebras with complete homology, Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg 22 (1958), 300307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeman, A. and Ranicki, A., Noncommutative localization in algebraic $K$-theory I, Geom. Topol. 8 (2004), 13851425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachikawa, H., Quasi-Frobenius rings and generalizations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 351 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xi, C. C., Derived equivalences of algebras, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 50 (2018), 945985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar