Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:33:19.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residues of intertwining operators for SO*6 as character identities

Part of: Lie groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2010

Freydoon Shahidi  and
Steven Spallone
Freydoon Shahidi
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA (email: [email protected])
Steven Spallone
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072, USA (email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that the residue at s=0 of the standard intertwining operator attached to a supercuspidal representation π⊗χ of the Levi subgroup GL2(F)×E1 of the quasisplit group SO*6(F) defined by a quadratic extension E/F of p-adic fields is proportional to the pairing of the characters of these representations considered on the graph of the norm map of Kottwitz–Shelstad. Here π is self-dual, and the norm is simply that of Hilbert’s theorem 90. The pairing can be carried over to a pairing between the character on E1 and the character on E× defining the representation of GL2(F) when the central character of the representation is quadratic, but non-trivial, through the character identities of Labesse–Langlands. If the quadratic extension defining the representation on GL2(F) is different from E the residue is then zero. On the other hand when the central character is trivial the residue is never zero. The results agree completely with the theory of twisted endoscopy and L-functions and determines fully the reducibility of corresponding induced representations for all s.

Keywords

p-adic representation theoryintertwining operatorscharacter identitiesL-functions

MSC classification

Secondary: 22E50: Representations of Lie and linear algebraic groups over local fields
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 146 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 772 - 794
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation Compositio Mathematica 2010

References

[1]Adler, J., Self-contragredient supercuspidal representations of GL n, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125 (1997), 2471–2479.Google Scholar
[2]Arthur, J., The endoscopic classification of representations: orthogonal and symplectic groups, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, to appear.Google Scholar
[3]Arthur, J., The local behaviour of weighted orbital integrals, Duke Math. J. 56 (1988), 223–293.Google Scholar
[4]Bump, D., Automorphic forms and representations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
[5]Clozel, L., Characters of non-connected, reductive p-adic groups, Canad. J. Math. 39 (1987), 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cogdell, J. W., Kim, H. H., Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. and Shahidi, F., Functoriality for the classical groups, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 99 (2004), 163–233.Google Scholar
[7]Goldberg, D. and Shahidi, F., On the tempered spectrum of quasi-split classical groups, Duke Math. J. 92 (1998), 255–294.Google Scholar
[8]Goldberg, D. and Shahidi, F., On the tempered spectrum of quasi-split classical groups II, Canad. J. Math. 53 (2001), 244–277.Google Scholar
[9]Goldberg, D. and Shahidi, F., On the tempered spectrum of quasi-split classical groups III, Forum Math., in press.Google Scholar
[10]Harish-Chandra, , Harmonic analysis on reductive p-adic groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 162 (Springer, Berlin, 1970), Notes by G. Van Dijk.Google Scholar
[11]Harish-Chandra, , Collected papers, Vol. IV (Springer, Berlin, 1984).Google Scholar
[12]Harris, M. and Taylor, R., The geometry and cohomology of some simple Shimura varieties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 151 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001).Google Scholar
[13]Henniart, G., Caractérisation de la correspondence de Langlands locale par les facteurs ϵ de paires, Invent. Math. 113 (1993), 339–350.Google Scholar
[14]Ireland, K. and Rosen, M., A classical introduction to modern number theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 84 (Springer, Berlin, 1990).Google Scholar
[15]Kottwitz, R. E. and Shelstad, D., Foundations of twisted endoscopy, Astérisque 255 (1999).Google Scholar
[16]Labesse, J.-P. and Langlands, R. P., L-indistinguishability for SL(2), Canad. J. Math. 31 (1979), 726–785.Google Scholar
[17]Langlands, R. P., On Artin’s L-functions, Rice Univ. Studies 56 (1970), 23–28.Google Scholar
[18]Langlands, R. P., Base change for GL(2), Ann. Math. Stud. 96 (1980) ch. 7.Google Scholar
[19]Serre, J. P., A course in arithmetic, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 7 (Springer, Berlin, 1973).Google Scholar
[20]Shahidi, F., A proof of Langlands’ conjecture on Plancherel measures; complementary series for p-adic groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 132 (1990), 273–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Shahidi, F., Twisted endoscopy and reducibility of induced representations for p-adic groups, Duke Math. J. 66 (1992), 1–41.Google Scholar
[22]Shahidi, F., L-functions and poles of intertwining operators, Appendix to ‘Residues of intertwining operators for classical groups’ by S. Spallone, IMRN, 2008 (2008), article ID rnn 095, 13 pages.Google Scholar
[23]Shimizu, H., Some examples of new forms, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IAMath. 24 (1977), 97–113.Google Scholar
[24]Silberger, A., PGL 2 over the p-adics: its representations, spherical functions, and Fourier analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 166 (Springer, Berlin, 1970).Google Scholar
[25]Silberger, A., Introduction to harmonic analysis on reductive p-adic groups, Mathematical Notes, vol. 23 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1979).Google Scholar
[26]Soudry, D., On Langlands functoriality from classical groups to GL(n), automorphic forms I, Astérisque 298 (2005), 335–390.Google Scholar
[27]Spallone, S., Residues of intertwining operators for classical groups, IMRN, 2008 (2008) article ID rnn 056, 37 pages.Google Scholar