Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:28:29.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mock Jacobi forms in basic hypergeometric series

Part of: Combinatorics Basic hypergeometric functions Discontinuous groups and automorphic forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Soon-Yi Kang
Soon-Yi Kang*
Affiliation:
Korea Advanced Institute for Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-701, Korea (email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that some q-series such as universal mock theta functions are linear sums of theta quotients and mock Jacobi forms of weight 1/2, which become holomorphic parts of real analytic modular forms when they are restricted to torsion points and multiplied by suitable powers of q. We also prove that certain linear sums of q-series are weakly holomorphic modular forms of weight 1/2 due to annihilation of mock Jacobi forms or completion by mock Jacobi forms. As an application, we obtain a relation between the rank and crank of a partition.

Keywords

basic hypergeometric seriesmock Jacobi formsmock modular formsweakly holomorphic modular formsranks and cranks of partitions

MSC classification

Secondary: 11F37: Forms of half-integer weight; nonholomorphic modular forms 11F50: Jacobi forms 05A17: Partitions of integers 33D15: Basic hypergeometric functions in one variable, $_rphi_s$
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 145 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 553 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation Compositio Mathematica 2009

References

[1]Andrews, G. E., Askey, R. and Roy, R., Special functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Andrews, G. E. and Garvan, F. G., Dyson’s crank of a partition, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N. S.) 18 (1988), 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Atkin, A. O. L. and Garvan, F. G., Relations between the ranks and cranks of partitions (Rankin memorial issues), Ramanujan J. 7 (2003), 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Atkin, A. O. L. and Swinnerton-Dyer, P., Some properties of partitions, Proc. London Math. Soc. 4 (1954), 84–106.Google Scholar
[5]Bringmann, K. and Ono, K., The f(q) mock theta function conjecture and partition ranks, Invent. Math. 165 (2006), 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Bringmann, K. and Ono, K., Dyson’s ranks and Maass forms, Ann. of Math. (2), to appear.Google Scholar
[7]Bringmann, K., Ono, K. and Rhoades, R. C., Eulerian series as modular forms, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (2008), 1085–1104.Google Scholar
[8]Bruinier, J. H. and Funke, J., On two geometric theta lifts, Duke Math. J. 125 (2004), 45–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Choi, D., Kang, S.-Y. and Lovejoy, J., Partitions weighted by the parity of the crank, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, to appear.Google Scholar
[10]Eichler, M. and Zagier, D., The theory of Jacobi forms, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 55 (Birkhauser, Basel, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Gasper, G. and Rahman, M., Basic hypergeometric series, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, vol. 96 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).Google Scholar
[12]Gordon, B. and McIntosh, R., A survey of mock-theta functions, I, Preprint,http://www.math.ufl.edu/fgarvan/pqsmfconf/workshop-program/slides/20SurveryMock.pdf.Google Scholar
[13]Hickerson, D., A proof of the mock theta conjectures, Invent. Math. 94 (1988), 639–660.Google Scholar
[14]Hickerson, D., On the seventh order mock theta functions, Invent. Math. 94 (1988), 661–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Kang, S.-Y., Generalizations of Ramanujan’s reciprocity theorem and their applications, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 75 (2007), 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Treneer, S., Congruences for the coefficients of weakly holomorphic modular forms, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 93 (2006), 304–324.Google Scholar
[17]Zagier, D., Ramanujan’s mock theta functions and their applications, Séminaire Bourbaki 60ème année (986) (2006–2007), http://www.bourbaki.ens.fr/TEXTES/986.pdf.Google Scholar
[18]Zwegers, S. P., Mock ϑ-functions and real analytic modular forms, in q-series with applications to combinatorics, number theory, and physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, October 26–28, 2000, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 291 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001), 269–277.Google Scholar
[19]Zwegers, S. P., Mock theta functions, PhD thesis, Utrecht (2002),http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2003-0127-094324/inhoud.htm.Google Scholar
[20]Zwegers, S. P., Appell-Lerch sums as mock modular forms, Presentation,http://mathsci.ucd.ie/∼zwegers/presentations/002.pdf.Google Scholar