Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:57:51.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

${l}^{2}$-invisibility and a class of local similarity groups

Part of: Connections with homological algebra and category theory Locally compact groups and their algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2014

Roman Sauer  and
Werner Thumann
Roman Sauer
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany email [email protected]
Werner Thumann
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany email [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this note we show that the members of a certain class of local similarity groups are ${l}^{2}$-invisible, i.e. the (non-reduced) group homology of the regular unitary representation vanishes in all degrees. This class contains groups of type ${F}_{\infty }$, e.g. Thompson’s group $V$ and Nekrashevych–Röver groups. They yield counterexamples to a generalized zero-in-the-spectrum conjecture for groups of type ${F}_{\infty }$.

Keywords

l2-cohomologyThompson’s groupzero-in-the-spectrum conjecture

MSC classification

Secondary: 20J05: Homological methods in group theory 22D10: Unitary representations of locally compact groups
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 150 , Issue 10 , October 2014 , pp. 1742 - 1754
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bader, U., Furman, A. and Sauer, R., Weak notions of normality and vanishing up to rank in L 2-cohomology, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2014 (2014), 3177–3189, doi:10.1093/imrn/rnt029.Google Scholar
Brown, K. S., Cohomology of groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 87 (Springer, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Brown, K. S., Finiteness properties of groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra. 44 (1987), 45–75.Google Scholar
Dold, A., Lectures on algebraic topology, Classics in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1995); reprint of the 1972 edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, M. and Weinberger, S., On the zero-in-the-spectrum conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2) 154 (2001), 139–154.Google Scholar
Farley, D. S. and Hughes, B., Finiteness properties of some groups of local similarities, Preprint (2012), arXiv:1206.2692 [math.GR].Google Scholar
Gromov, M., Large Riemannian manifolds, Curvature and topology of Riemannian manifolds (Katata, 1985), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1201 (Springer, Berlin, 1986), 108–121.Google Scholar
Hughes, B., Local similarities and the Haagerup property, Groups Geom. Dyn. 3 (2009), 299–315; with an appendix by Daniel S. Farley.Google Scholar
Hughes, B., Trees and ultrametric spaces: a categorical equivalence, Adv. Math. 189 (2004), 148–191.Google Scholar
Lott, J., The zero-in-the-spectrum question, Enseign. Math. (2) 42 (1996), 341–376.Google Scholar
Lück, W., L 2-invariants from the algebraic point of view, Geometric and cohomological methods in group theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 358 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009), 63–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lück, W., L 2-invariants: theory and applications to geometry and K-theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge, vol. 44 (A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics) (Springer, Berlin, 2002).Google Scholar
Monod, N., On the bounded cohomology of semi-simple groups, S-arithmetic groups and products, J. Reine Angew. Math. 640 (2010), 167–202.Google Scholar
Nekrashevych, V. V., Cuntz–Pimsner algebras of group actions, J. Operator Theory 52 (2004), 223–249.Google Scholar
Oguni, S.-i., The group homology and an algebraic version of the zero-in-the-spectrum conjecture, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 47 (2007), 359–369.Google Scholar
Röver, C. E., Constructing finitely presented simple groups that contain Grigorchuk groups, J. Algebra. 220 (1999), 284–313.Google Scholar