Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:20:26.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hyperbolicity related problems for complete intersection varieties

Part of: (Co)homology theory Special varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2013

Damian Brotbek
Damian Brotbek*
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée, Université de Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France email [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we examine different problems regarding complete intersection varieties of high multidegree in a smooth complex projective variety. First we prove an existence theorem for jet differential equations that generalizes a theorem of Diverio. Then we show how one can deduce hyperbolicity for generic complete intersections of high multidegree and high codimension from the known results on hypersurfaces. Finally, motivated by a conjecture of Debarre, we focus on the positivity of the cotangent bundle of complete intersections, and prove some results towards this conjecture; among other things, we prove that a generic complete intersection surface of high multidegree in a projective space of dimension at least four has an ample cotangent bundle.

Keywords

complete intersectionsample cotangent bundlejet differential equations

MSC classification

Secondary: 14M10: Complete intersections 14F10: Differentials and other special sheaves; D-modules; Bernstein-Sato ideals and polynomials
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 150 , Issue 3 , March 2014 , pp. 369 - 395
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogomolov, F. A., Holomorphic symmetric tensors on projective surfaces, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 33 (1978), 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debarre, O., Varieties with ample cotangent bundle, Compositio Math. 141 (2005), 1445–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demailly, J.-P., Algebraic criteria for Kobayashi hyperbolic projective varieties and jet differentials, in Algebraic geometry, Santa Cruz, CA, 1995, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, vol. 62 (American Mathematcial Society, Providence, RI, 1997), 285–360.Google Scholar
Diverio, S., Differential equations on complex projective hypersurfaces of low dimension, Compositio Math. 144 (2008), 920–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diverio, S., Existence of global invariant jet differentials on projective hypersurfaces of high degree, Math. Ann. 344 (2009), 293–315.Google Scholar
Diverio, S., Merker, J. and Rousseau, E., Effective algebraic degeneracy, Invent. Math. 180 (2010), 161–223.Google Scholar
Diverio, S. and Trapani, S., A remark on the codimension of the Green–Griffiths locus of generic projective hypersurfaces of high degree, J. Reine Angew. Math. 649 (2010), 55–61.Google Scholar
Fulton, W., Ample vector bundles, Chern classes, and numerical criteria, Invent. Math. 32 (1976), 171–178.Google Scholar
Fulton, W., Intersection theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, series 3, A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, vol. 2, second edition (Springer, Berlin, 1998).Google Scholar
Fulton, W. and Lazarsfeld, R., Positive polynomials for ample vector bundles, Ann. of Math. (2) 118 (1983), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, R., Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52 (Springer, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, R., Positivity in algebraic geometry. I, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, series 3, A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, vol. 48 (Springer, Berlin, 2004).Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, R., Positivity in algebraic geometry. II, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, series 3, A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, vol. 49 (Springer, Berlin, 2004).Google Scholar
Merker, J., Low pole order frames on vertical jets of the universal hypersurface, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 59 (2009), 1077–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyaoka, Y., On the Chern numbers of surfaces of general type, Invent. Math. 42 (1977), 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyaoka, Y., Algebraic surfaces with positive indices, in Classification of algebraic and analytic manifolds, Katata, 1982, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 39 (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1983), 281–301.Google Scholar
Mourougane, C., Families of hypersurfaces of large degree, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14 (2012), 911–936.Google Scholar
Păun, M., Vector fields on the total space of hypersurfaces in the projective space and hyperbolicity, Math. Ann. 340 (2008), 875–892.Google Scholar
Rousseau, E., Weak analytic hyperbolicity of generic hypersurfaces of high degree in ${ \mathbb{P} }^{4} $, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 16 (2007), 369–383.Google Scholar
Rousseau, E., Logarithmic vector fields and hyperbolicity, Nagoya Math. J. 195 (2009), 21–40.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., Complex surfaces with negative tangent bundle, in Complex analysis and algebraic geometry, Göttingen, 1985, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1194 (Springer, Berlin, 1986), 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M., Symmetric differential forms as embedding obstructions and vanishing theorems, J. Algebraic Geom. 1 (1992), 175–181.Google Scholar
Siu, Y.-T., Hyperbolicity in complex geometry, in The legacy of Niels Henrik Abel (Springer, Berlin, 2004), 543–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommese, A. J., On the density of ratios of Chern numbers of algebraic surfaces, Math. Ann. 268 (1984), 207–221.Google Scholar
Voisin, C., On a conjecture of Clemens on rational curves on hypersurfaces, J. Differential Geom. 44 (1996), 200–213.Google Scholar